Literature DB >> 16237141

Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience.

Heang-Ping Chan1, Jun Wei, Berkman Sahiner, Elizabeth A Rafferty, Tao Wu, Marilyn A Roubidoux, Richard H Moore, Daniel B Kopans, Lubomir M Hadjiiski, Mark A Helvie.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to design a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for breast mass detection on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) mammograms and to perform a preliminary evaluation of the performance of this system. Twenty-six patients were imaged with a prototype DBT system. Institutional review board approval and written informed patient consent were obtained. Use of the data set in this study was HIPAA compliant. The CAD system first screened the three-dimensional volume of the mass candidates by means of gradient-field analysis. Each mass candidate was segmented from the structured background, and its image features were extracted. A feature classifier was designed to differentiate true masses from normal tissues. The CAD system was trained and tested by using a leave-one-case-out method. The classifier calculated a mean area under the test receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91 +/- 0.03 (standard error of mean). The CAD system achieved a sensitivity of 85%, with 2.2 false-positive objects per case. The results demonstrate the feasibility of the authors' approach to the development of a CAD system for DBT mammography. RSNA, 2005

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16237141      PMCID: PMC2800984          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2373041657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  16 in total

1.  Classifier design for computer-aided diagnosis: effects of finite sample size on the mean performance of classical and neural network classifiers.

Authors:  H P Chan; B Sahiner; R F Wagner; N Petrick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; Devon J Godfrey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Effects of magnification and zooming on depth perception in digital stereomammography: an observer performance study.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Janet E Bailey; Katherine Klein; Katie L Darner; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis.

Authors:  H P Chan; K Doi; C J Vyborny; R A Schmidt; C E Metz; K L Lam; T Ogura; Y Z Wu; H MacMahon
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data.

Authors:  C E Metz; B A Herman; J H Shen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; M A Helvie; M M Goodsitt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Alexander Stewart; Martin Stanton; Thomas McCauley; Walter Phillips; Daniel B Kopans; Richard H Moore; Jeffrey W Eberhard; Beale Opsahl-Ong; Loren Niklason; Mark B Williams
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark A Helvie; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Erini Makariou; Heang-Ping Chan; Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner; Shih-Chung B Lo; Matthew Freedman; Dorit Adler; Janet Bailey; Caroline Blane; Donna Hoff; Karen Hunt; Lynn Joynt; Katherine Klein; Chintana Paramagul; Stephanie K Patterson; Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Bird; T W Wallace; B C Yankaskas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  31 in total

1.  Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Jun Wei; Chuan Zhou; Yao Lu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Yi-Ta Wu; Berkman Sahiner; Jun Wei; Mark A Helvie; Yiheng Zhang; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Ted Way
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Integration of microwave tomography with magnetic resonance for improved breast imaging.

Authors:  Paul M Meaney; Amir H Golnabi; Neil R Epstein; Shireen D Geimer; Margaret W Fanning; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Evaluation of the effect of geometry for measuring section thickness in tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Ryohei Fukui; Rie Ishii; Junichi Kishimoto; Shinichiro Yamato; Akira Takahata; Chiyuki Kohama
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-11-20

6.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Alicia Toledano; Cosimo di Maggio; Enrica Baldan; Elisabetta Bezzon; Manuela La Grassa; Luigi Pescarini; Ilaria Polico; Alessandro Proietti; Aida Toffoli; Pier Carlo Muzzio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Yiheng Zhang; Mark A Helvie; Richard H Moore; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach.

Authors:  Swatee Singh; Georgia D Tourassi; Jay A Baker; Ehsan Samei; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Kayla Mendel; Hui Li; Deepa Sheth; Maryellen Giger
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Dragana Roganovic; Dragana Djilas; Sasa Vujnovic; Dag Pavic; Dragan Stojanov
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.363

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.