Literature DB >> 26587549

Core samples for radiomics features that are insensitive to tumor segmentation: method and pilot study using CT images of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Sebastian Echegaray1, Olivier Gevaert2, Rajesh Shah2, Aya Kamaya2, John Louie2, Nishita Kothary2, Sandy Napel2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the utility of obtaining "core samples" of regions in CT volume scans for extraction of radiomic features. We asked four readers to outline tumors in three representative slices from each phase of multiphasic liver CT images taken from 29 patients (1128 segmentations) with hepatocellular carcinoma. Core samples were obtained by automatically tracing the maximal circle inscribed in the outlines. Image features describing the intensity, texture, shape, and margin were used to describe the segmented lesion. We calculated the intraclass correlation between the features extracted from the readers' segmentations and their core samples to characterize robustness to segmentation between readers, and between human-based segmentation and core sampling. We conclude that despite the high interreader variability in manually delineating the tumor (average overlap of 43% across all readers), certain features such as intensity and texture features are robust to segmentation. More importantly, this same subset of features can be obtained from the core samples, providing as much information as detailed segmentation while being simpler and faster to obtain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; hepatocellular carcinoma; image features; radiomics; segmentation; stability

Year:  2015        PMID: 26587549      PMCID: PMC4650964          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.4.041011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  37 in total

1.  Automatic segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasound.

Authors:  K Horsch; M L Giger; L A Venta; C J Vyborny
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images.

Authors:  Peter J Bex; Walter Makous
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Interactive liver tumor segmentation from ct scans using support vector classification with watershed.

Authors:  Xing Zhang; Jie Tian; Dehui Xiang; Xiuli Li; Kexin Deng
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

4.  Contrast in complex images.

Authors:  E Peli
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Maryellen L Giger; Ulrich Bick
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  A comparison of wavelet, ridgelet, and curvelet-based texture classification algorithms in computed tomography.

Authors:  Lucia Dettori; Lindsay Semler
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 4.589

7.  Liver segmentation in living liver transplant donors: comparison of semiautomatic and manual methods.

Authors:  Laurent Hermoye; Ismael Laamari-Azjal; Zhujiang Cao; Laurence Annet; Jan Lerut; Benoit M Dawant; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Automated tracking of quantitative assessments of tumor burden in clinical trials.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin; Debra Willrett; Martin J O'Connor; Cleber Hage; Camille Kurtz; Dilvan A Moreira
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Reproducibility and Prognosis of Quantitative Features Extracted from CT Images.

Authors:  Yoganand Balagurunathan; Yuhua Gu; Hua Wang; Virendra Kumar; Olya Grove; Sam Hawkins; Jongphil Kim; Dmitry B Goldgof; Lawrence O Hall; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Can voxel based morphometry, manual segmentation and automated segmentation equally detect hippocampal volume differences in acute depression?

Authors:  Loretxu Bergouignan; Marie Chupin; Yvonne Czechowska; Serge Kinkingnéhun; Cédric Lemogne; Guillaume Le Bastard; Martin Lepage; Line Garnero; Olivier Colliot; Philippe Fossati
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  25 in total

1.  Influence of segmentation margin on machine learning-based high-dimensional quantitative CT texture analysis: a reproducibility study on renal clear cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Burak Kocak; Ece Ates; Emine Sebnem Durmaz; Melis Baykara Ulusan; Ozgur Kilickesmez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Novel Quantitative Imaging for Predicting Response to Therapy: Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2018-05-23

3.  A fully automatic end-to-end method for content-based image retrieval of CT scans with similar liver lesion annotations.

Authors:  A B Spanier; N Caplan; J Sosna; B Acar; L Joskowicz
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Noninvasive radiomics signature based on quantitative analysis of computed tomography images as a surrogate for microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shaimaa Bakr; Sebastian Echegaray; Rajesh Shah; Aya Kamaya; John Louie; Sandy Napel; Nishita Kothary; Olivier Gevaert
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-08-21

5.  Predicting the tumor response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: Model development and external validation using MRI radiomics.

Authors:  Philippe Bulens; Alice Couwenberg; Martijn Intven; Annelies Debucquoy; Vincent Vandecaveye; Eric Van Cutsem; André D'Hoore; Albert Wolthuis; Pritam Mukherjee; Olivier Gevaert; Karin Haustermans
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Distinguishing granulomas from adenocarcinomas by integrating stable and discriminating radiomic features on non-contrast computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Mohammadhadi Khorrami; Kaustav Bera; Rajat Thawani; Prabhakar Rajiah; Amit Gupta; Pingfu Fu; Philip Linden; Nathan Pennell; Frank Jacono; Robert C Gilkeson; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Considerable effects of imaging sequences, feature extraction, feature selection, and classifiers on radiomics-based prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Houjiao Dai; Minhua Lu; Bingsheng Huang; Mimi Tang; Tiantian Pang; Bing Liao; Huasong Cai; Mengqi Huang; Yongjin Zhou; Xin Chen; Huijun Ding; Shi-Ting Feng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

Review 8.  The Role of Radiomics in Lung Cancer: From Screening to Treatment and Follow-Up.

Authors:  Radouane El Ayachy; Nicolas Giraud; Paul Giraud; Catherine Durdux; Philippe Giraud; Anita Burgun; Jean Emmanuel Bibault
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Radiomics in hepatocellular carcinoma: a quantitative review.

Authors:  Taiga Wakabayashi; Farid Ouhmich; Cristians Gonzalez-Cabrera; Emanuele Felli; Antonio Saviano; Vincent Agnus; Peter Savadjiev; Thomas F Baumert; Patrick Pessaux; Jacques Marescaux; Benoit Gallix
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 9.029

Review 10.  Machine and deep learning methods for radiomics.

Authors:  Michele Avanzo; Lise Wei; Joseph Stancanello; Martin Vallières; Arvind Rao; Olivier Morin; Sarah A Mattonen; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.