Literature DB >> 11548934

Automatic segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasound.

K Horsch1, M L Giger, L A Venta, C J Vyborny.   

Abstract

In this paper we present a computationally efficient segmentation algorithm for breast masses on sonography that is based on maximizing a utility function over partition margins defined through gray-value thresholding of a preprocessed image. The performance of the segmentation algorithm is evaluated on a database of 400 cases in two ways. Of the 400 cases, 124 were complex cysts, 182 were benign solid lesions, and 94 were malignant lesions. In the first evaluation, the computer-delineated margins were compared to manually delineated margins. At an overlap threshold of 0.40, the segmentation algorithm correctly delineated 94% of the lesions. In the second evaluation, the performance of our computer-aided diagnosis method on the computer-delineated margins was compared to the performance of our method on the manually delineated margins. Round robin evaluation yielded Az values of 0.90 and 0.87 on the manually delineated margins and the computer-delineated margins, respectively, in the task of distinguishing between malignant and nonmalignant lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11548934     DOI: 10.1118/1.1386426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  Impact of lesion segmentation metrics on computer-aided diagnosis/detection in breast computed tomography.

Authors:  Hsien-Chi Kuo; Maryellen L Giger; Ingrid Reiser; Karen Drukker; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors; Kai Yang; Alexandra Edwards
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-24

2.  Level set contouring for breast tumor in sonography.

Authors:  Yu-Len Huang; Yu-Ru Jiang; Dar-Ren Chen; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A new automated method for the segmentation and characterization of breast masses on ultrasound images.

Authors:  Jing Cui; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Alexis Nees; Chintana Paramagul; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Chuan Zhou; Jiazheng Shi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Breast US computer-aided diagnosis system: robustness across urban populations in South Korea and the United States.

Authors:  Nicholas P Gruszauskas; Karen Drukker; Maryellen L Giger; Ruey-Feng Chang; Charlene A Sennett; Woo Kyung Moon; Lorenzo L Pesce
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Breast ultrasound image segmentation: a survey.

Authors:  Qinghua Huang; Yaozhong Luo; Qiangzhi Zhang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Semiparametric estimation of the relationship between ROC operating points and the test-result scale: application to the proper binormal model.

Authors:  Lorenzo L Pesce; Karla Horsch; Karen Drukker; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Prevalence scaling: applications to an intelligent workstation for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Karla Horsch; Maryellen L Giger; Charles E Metz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Quantitative ultrasound image analysis of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Karen Drukker; Maryellen Giger; Lina Arbash Meinel; Adam Starkey; Jyothi Janardanan; Hiroyuki Abe
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Malignant lesion segmentation in contrast-enhanced breast MR images based on the marker-controlled watershed.

Authors:  Yunfeng Cui; Yongqiang Tan; Binsheng Zhao; Laura Liberman; Rakesh Parbhu; Jennifer Kaplan; Maria Theodoulou; Clifford Hudis; Lawrence H Schwartz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.