Mohammadhadi Khorrami1, Kaustav Bera1, Rajat Thawani2, Prabhakar Rajiah3, Amit Gupta4, Pingfu Fu5, Philip Linden6, Nathan Pennell7, Frank Jacono8, Robert C Gilkeson4, Vamsidhar Velcheti9, Anant Madabhushi10. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. 2. OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Oregon, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, CWRU, Cleveland, OH, USA. 6. Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. 7. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 8. Pulmonary Section, Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. 9. Department of Hematology and Oncology, NYU Langone Health, NY, NY, USA. 10. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA; Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address: axm788@case.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify stable and discriminating radiomic features on non-contrast CT scans to develop more generalisable radiomic classifiers for distinguishing granulomas from adenocarcinomas. METHODS: In total, 412 patients with adenocarcinomas and granulomas from three institutions were retrospectively included. Segmentations of the lung nodules were performed manually by an expert radiologist in a 2D axial view. Radiomic features were extracted from intra- and perinodular regions. A total of 145 patients were used as part of the training set (Str), whereas 205 patients were used as part of test set I (Ste1) and 62 patients were used as part of independent test set II (Ste2). To mitigate the variation of CT acquisition parameters, we defined 'stable' radiomic features as those for which the feature expression remains relatively unchanged between different sites, as assessed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. These stable features were used to develop more generalisable radiomic classifiers that were more resilient to variations in lung CT scans. Features were ranked based on two criteria, firstly based on discriminability (i.e. maximising AUC) alone and subsequently based on maximising both feature stability and discriminability. Different machine-learning classifiers (Linear discriminant analysis, Quadratic discriminant analysis, Support vector machines and random forest) were trained with features selected using the two different criteria and then compared on the two independent test sets for distinguishing granulomas from adenocarcinomas, in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: In the test sets, classifiers constructed using the criteria involving maximising feature stability and discriminability simultaneously achieved higher AUC compared with the discriminating alone criteria (Ste1 [n = 205]: maximum AUCs of 0.85versus . 0.80; p-value = 0.047 and Ste2 [n = 62]: maximum AUCs of 0.87 versus. 0.79; p-value = 0.021). These differences held for features extracted from scans with <3 mm slice thickness (AUC = 0.88 versus. 0.80; p-value = 0.039, n = 100) and for the ≥3 mm cases (AUC = 0.81 versus. 0.76; p-value = 0.034, n = 105). In both experiments, shape and peritumoural texture features had a higher stability compared with intratumoural texture features. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that explicitly accounting for both stability and discriminability results in more generalisable radiomic classifiers to distinguish adenocarcinomas from granulomas on non-contrast CT scans. Our results also showed that peritumoural texture and shape features were less affected by the scanner parameters compared with intratumoural texture features; however, they were also less discriminating compared with intratumoural features.
OBJECTIVE: To identify stable and discriminating radiomic features on non-contrast CT scans to develop more generalisable radiomic classifiers for distinguishing granulomas from adenocarcinomas. METHODS: In total, 412 patients with adenocarcinomas and granulomas from three institutions were retrospectively included. Segmentations of the lung nodules were performed manually by an expert radiologist in a 2D axial view. Radiomic features were extracted from intra- and perinodular regions. A total of 145 patients were used as part of the training set (Str), whereas 205 patients were used as part of test set I (Ste1) and 62 patients were used as part of independent test set II (Ste2). To mitigate the variation of CT acquisition parameters, we defined 'stable' radiomic features as those for which the feature expression remains relatively unchanged between different sites, as assessed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. These stable features were used to develop more generalisable radiomic classifiers that were more resilient to variations in lung CT scans. Features were ranked based on two criteria, firstly based on discriminability (i.e. maximising AUC) alone and subsequently based on maximising both feature stability and discriminability. Different machine-learning classifiers (Linear discriminant analysis, Quadratic discriminant analysis, Support vector machines and random forest) were trained with features selected using the two different criteria and then compared on the two independent test sets for distinguishing granulomas from adenocarcinomas, in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: In the test sets, classifiers constructed using the criteria involving maximising feature stability and discriminability simultaneously achieved higher AUC compared with the discriminating alone criteria (Ste1 [n = 205]: maximum AUCs of 0.85versus . 0.80; p-value = 0.047 and Ste2 [n = 62]: maximum AUCs of 0.87 versus. 0.79; p-value = 0.021). These differences held for features extracted from scans with <3 mm slice thickness (AUC = 0.88 versus. 0.80; p-value = 0.039, n = 100) and for the ≥3 mm cases (AUC = 0.81 versus. 0.76; p-value = 0.034, n = 105). In both experiments, shape and peritumoural texture features had a higher stability compared with intratumoural texture features. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that explicitly accounting for both stability and discriminability results in more generalisable radiomic classifiers to distinguish adenocarcinomas from granulomas on non-contrast CT scans. Our results also showed that peritumoural texture and shape features were less affected by the scanner parameters compared with intratumoural texture features; however, they were also less discriminating compared with intratumoural features.
Authors: Berend C Stoel; M Els Bakker; Jan Stolk; Asger Dirksen; Robert A Stockley; Eeva Piitulainen; Erich W Russi; Johan H C Reiber Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Muhammad Shafiq-Ul-Hassan; Geoffrey G Zhang; Kujtim Latifi; Ghanim Ullah; Dylan C Hunt; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Mahmoud Abrahem Abdalah; Matthew B Schabath; Dmitry G Goldgof; Dennis Mackin; Laurence Edward Court; Robert James Gillies; Eduardo Gerardo Moros Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Mahdi Orooji; Mehdi Alilou; Sagar Rakshit; Niha Beig; Mohammad Hadi Khorrami; Prabhakar Rajiah; Rajat Thawani; Jennifer Ginsberg; Christopher Donatelli; Michael Yang; Frank Jacono; Robert Gilkeson; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Philip Linden; Anant Madabhushi Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2018-04-18
Authors: Deirdre A Nelson; Ting-Ting Tan; Arnold B Rabson; Diana Anderson; Kurt Degenhardt; Eileen White Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2004-08-16 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: S Gabor; H Renner; H Popper; U Anegg; O Sankin; V Matzi; J Lindenmann; F M Smolle Jüttner Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Harri Merisaari; Pekka Taimen; Rakesh Shiradkar; Otto Ettala; Marko Pesola; Jani Saunavaara; Peter J Boström; Anant Madabhushi; Hannu J Aronen; Ivan Jambor Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: George Amadeus Prenosil; Thilo Weitzel; Markus Fürstner; Michael Hentschel; Thomas Krause; Paul Cumming; Axel Rominger; Bernd Klaeser Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael A Labarbera; Thomas Atta-Fosu; Albert K Feeny; Marjan Firouznia; Meghan Mchale; Catherine Cantlay; Tyler Roach; Alexis Axtell; Paul Schoenhagen; John Barnard; Jonathan D Smith; David R Van Wagoner; Anant Madabhushi; Mina K Chung Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2021-12-09