Literature DB >> 26587515

COMPARISON OF IOP READINGS USING REBOUND I CARE TONOMETER AND PERKINS APPLANATION TONOMETER IN AN AFRICAN POPULATION.

D S Ademola-Popoola1, A F Odi, T M Akande.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate intra ocular pressure (IOP) measurement and monitoring using tonometry is a common clinical measurement in diagnosis and management of glaucoma, this is often a challenge in children. The ICare and Perkins tonometers are both handheld tonometers, Perkins uses applanation while ICare measures IOP with a rebound method.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of research were to study the IOP values from each tonometer, compare the value of IOP readings from both tonometers, determined the ease of their use in young children and document the various positions in which the tonometers were used successfully in children.
METHOD: Intra ocular pressure readings were taken by two experienced examiners in upright position without sedation or anaesthesia. ICare tonometer was first used. Data were entered and analysed with SPSS 17 statistical package. The means were compared using paired sample T-test.
RESULTS: A total of 480 eyes of 240 persons, aged between 2months and 90years with a mean of 46.2±22 years had their intra-ocular pressure range between 3 and 44mmHg( Mean16.3±6) measured using ICare and Perkins tonometry. There was a high correlation, and no statistically significant differences in the mean IOP comparing ICare and Perkins tonometers. The mean difference in average IOP readings between ICare and Perkins was -0.08±2.8 (95% CI: 0.45-0.30; r=0.87, p= 0.68) for right eye and -0.15±2.8mmHg (95% CI -0.53 to 0.23; r=0.86, p=0.44) in the left eye The difference in the average IOP reading from both tonometers was within 2mmHg 288(66.2%) eyes. Among the 147 (33.8%) eyes with a difference in IOP greater than 2mmHg, Perkins was responsible for the higher IOP reading in 76(51.7%) and ICare in 71(48.3%) p=0.56. Among 42 eyes of 21 children aged ≤6years, IOP reading was successfully taken in 41(97.6%) and 21(50%) eyes with ICare and Perkins respectively without sedation or anaesthesia.
CONCLUSION: The IOP readings using the ICare tonometer compares well with that of Perkins tonometer. The ICare was easier to use in young children (≤6year olds) without sedation or anaesthesia in this African population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; ICare; Intra-ocular pressure; Perkins; Tonometer

Year:  2014        PMID: 26587515      PMCID: PMC4501181     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg        ISSN: 2276-6944


  18 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer.

Authors:  Leon N Davies; Hannah Bartlett; Edward A H Mallen; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2006-04

2.  Minimal cross-infection risk through Icare rebound tonometer probes: a useful tool for IOP-screenings in developing countries.

Authors:  S Briesen; M Schulze Schwering; H Roberts; M Kollmann; O Stachs; D Behrend; St Schäfer; R Guthoff
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Stephen J Vincent; Roslyn A Vincent; David Shields; Graham A Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum.

Authors:  M A Kass
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Evaluation of the ICare rebound tonometer as a home intraocular pressure monitoring device.

Authors:  Sanjay Asrani; Ashmita Chatterjee; David K Wallace; Cecilia Santiago-Turla; Sandra Stinnett
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  [Clinical evaluation of the dynamic rebound tonometer Icare].

Authors:  M Detry-Morel; J Jamart; M B Detry; S Pourjavan; L Charlier; B Dethinne; L Huge; A Ledoux
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.818

7.  The effects of sevoflurane and ketamine on intraocular pressure in children during examination under anesthesia.

Authors:  Dana Blumberg; Nathan Congdon; Henry Jampel; Donna Gilbert; Richard Elliott; Richard Rivers; Beatrice Munoz; Harry Quigley
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Icare ONE rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with known or suspected glaucoma.

Authors:  Nandini G Gandhi; Sasapin G Prakalapakorn; Mays A El-Dairi; Sarah K Jones; Sharon F Freedman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Accuracy of the ICare rebound tonometer in glaucomatous eyes with topical ocular hypotensive medication.

Authors:  Alberto Diaz; Eva Yebra-Pimentel; Carlos García Resua; Jorge Gilino; Ma Jesus Giraldez
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Comparison of the Icare tonometer and the hand-held goldmann applanation tonometer in pediatric aphakia.

Authors:  Yunping Li; Luosheng Tang; Manyi Xiao; Songbai Jia; Ping Liu; Yi Zhou; Huihui Chen; Jiexi Zeng
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Tonometers-which one should I use?

Authors:  Kanza Aziz; David S Friedman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.775

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.