Literature DB >> 32863099

Objective evidence of temporal processing deficits in older adults.

Samira Anderson1, Hanin Karawani2.   

Abstract

The older listener's ability to understand speech in challenging environments may be affected by impaired temporal processing. This review summarizes objective evidence of degraded temporal processing from studies that have used the auditory brainstem response, auditory steady-state response, the envelope- or frequency-following response, cortical auditory-evoked potentials, and neural tracking of continuous speech. Studies have revealed delayed latencies and reduced amplitudes/phase locking in subcortical responses in older vs. younger listeners, in contrast to enhanced amplitudes of cortical responses in older listeners. Reconstruction accuracy of responses to continuous speech (e.g., cortical envelope tracking) shows over-representation in older listeners. Hearing loss is a factor in many of these studies, even though the listeners would be considered to have clinically normal hearing thresholds. Overall, the ability to draw definitive conclusions regarding these studies is limited by the use of multiple stimulus conditions, small sample sizes, and lack of replication. Nevertheless, these objective measures suggest a need to incorporate new clinical measures to provide a more comprehensive assessment of the listener's speech understanding ability, but more work is needed to determine the most efficacious measure for clinical use. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Auditory brainstem response; Auditory steady-state response; Cortical auditory-evoked potential; Envelope tracking; Frequency-following response; Hearing impairment; Magnetoencephalography; Temporal processing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32863099      PMCID: PMC7669636          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  186 in total

1.  Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Anthony T Herdman; Otavio Lins; Patricia Van Roon; David R Stapells; Michael Scherg; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 2.  Age-related Changes in Neural Coding of Envelope Cues: Peripheral Declines and Central Compensation.

Authors:  Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Edward L Bartlett; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.

Authors:  Parker Tichko; Erika Skoe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Attentional Selection in a Cocktail Party Environment Can Be Decoded from Single-Trial EEG.

Authors:  James A O'Sullivan; Alan J Power; Nima Mesgarani; Siddharth Rajaram; John J Foxe; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Malcolm Slaney; Shihab A Shamma; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Processing of broadband stimuli across A1 layers in young and aged rats.

Authors:  Larry F Hughes; Jeremy G Turner; Jennifer L Parrish; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Kelly L Tremblay; Ananthanarayan R Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Gap detection threshold in the rat before and after auditory cortex ablation.

Authors:  J Syka; N Rybalko; J Mazelová; R Druga
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Effect of click rate on the latency of auditory brain stem responses in humans.

Authors:  M Don; A R Allen; A Starr
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Auditory temporal processing in healthy aging: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Peter Sörös; Inga K Teismann; Elisabeth Manemann; Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Effects of Age, Cognition, and Neural Encoding on the Perception of Temporal Speech Cues.

Authors:  Lindsey Roque; Hanin Karawani; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and investigational tools for monitoring noise-induced hyperacusis.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Cutting Through the Noise: Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy and Individual Differences in Speech Understanding Among Listeners With Normal Audiograms.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Lori L Holt; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Aging Affects Subcortical Pitch Information Encoding Differently in Humans With Different Language Backgrounds.

Authors:  Dongxin Liu; Jiong Hu; Songjian Wang; Xinxing Fu; Yuan Wang; Esther Pugh; Jennifer Henderson Sabes; Shuo Wang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.702

Review 4.  Linear Modeling of Neurophysiological Responses to Speech and Other Continuous Stimuli: Methodological Considerations for Applied Research.

Authors:  Michael J Crosse; Nathaniel J Zuk; Giovanni M Di Liberto; Aaron R Nidiffer; Sophie Molholm; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Difficulties Experienced by Older Listeners in Utilizing Voice Cues for Speaker Discrimination.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Liat Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-03

6.  Age-related hearing loss is associated with alterations in temporal envelope processing in different neural generators along the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Ehsan Darestani Farahani; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.086

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.