Literature DB >> 1608256

Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses.

S P Bacon1, R M Gleitman.   

Abstract

Modulation detection thresholds were measured as a function of modulation frequency in 5 normal-hearing subjects and in 8 subjects with relatively flat, slight-to-moderate hearing losses. The carrier was a broadband noise that was sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) in one of two observation intervals. The spectrum level of the carrier ranged from -10 to 50 dB SPL, and, for a given carrier level, modulation frequency varied from 2 to 1024 Hz. The temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) were fitted very well with a simple equation describing a low-pass filter function. The TMTFs from the normal-hearing subjects were relatively independent of carrier level, although the derived time constant tended to increase slightly with decreases in carrier level, from an average value of 2.5 msec at 30 dB SPL to 6.0 msec at -10 dB SPL. In addition, sensitivity to amplitude modulation (AM) decreased by about 4 dB as the pressure spectrum level of the carrier was decreased from 0 to -10 dB SPL. The TMTFs from 7 of the 8 hearing-impaired subjects were similar to those from the normal-hearing subjects when the carriers were presented at equal SPLs, except that the derived time constants were slightly larger in the subjects with hearing impairment. When comparisons were made at comparable sensation levels (SLs), however, the TMTFs from the two groups of subjects were quantitatively similar, with the exception that at the lowest SL (20 dB), hearing-impaired subjects typically were more sensitive to AM than normal-hearing subjects, and the derived time constants from their TMTFs were somewhat smaller. These results, taken together with previously published results, suggest that a broad listening bandwidth is important for normal performance on a temporal resolution task. That the time constant from one of the hearing-impaired subjects was significantly longer than normal, regardless of whether the comparisons were made at equal SPL or equal SL, indicates that other factors can also be important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1608256     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3503.642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  32 in total

1.  Relative contributions of temporal envelope and fine structure cues to lexical tone recognition in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Shuo Wang; Li Xu; Robert Mannell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-11

2.  Determination of the potential benefit of time-frequency gain manipulation.

Authors:  Michael C Anzalone; Lauren Calandruccio; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Acoustical correlates of performance on a dynamic range compression discrimination task.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; Frederick J Gallun; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Yuxuan Wang; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shuman He; Paul J Abbas; Danielle V Doyle; Tyler C McFayden; Stephen Mulherin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Junwen Mao; Kelly-Jo Koch; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-15

7.  Methods and applications of the audibility index in hearing aid selection and fitting.

Authors:  Amyn M Amlani; Jerry L Punch; Teresa Y C Ching
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-09

8.  The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Temporal modulation transfer functions measured from auditory-nerve responses following sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Sushrut Kale; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.

Authors:  Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Patrick M Zurek
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.