| Literature DB >> 26582309 |
Jin-Tao Zhang1,2, Shan-Shan Ma3, Sarah W Yip4, Ling-Jiao Wang5, Chao Chen6, Chao-Gan Yan7,8,9, Lu Liu10, Ben Liu11, Lin-Yuan Deng12, Qin-Xue Liu13, Xiao-Yi Fang14,15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Internet gaming disorder (IGD) has become an increasing mental health problem worldwide. Decreased resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) between the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) has been found in substance use and is thought to play an important role in the development of substance addiction. However, rsFC between the VTA and NAcc in a non-substance addiction, such as IGD, has not been assessed previously. The current study aimed to investigate: (1) if individuals with IGD exhibit alterations in VTA-NAcc functional connectivity; and (2) whether VTA-NAcc functional connectivity is associated with subjective Internet craving.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26582309 PMCID: PMC4652358 DOI: 10.1186/s12993-015-0082-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Brain Funct ISSN: 1744-9081 Impact factor: 3.759
Demographic characteristics and behavioral information for IGD and HC groups
| IGD (n = 35) | HC (n = 24) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 22.46 ± 2.21 | 23.13 ± 2.09 | −1.16 |
| CIAS | 76.23 ± 7.67 | 45.79 ± 9.61 | 13.51*** |
| Time spent on Internet gaming | 23.77 ± 12.01 | 1.07 ± 0.45n | −6.58 a,*** |
| Craving | 30.83 ± 7.48 | 13.42 ± 6.82 | 9.10*** |
| Anxiety | 5.40 ± 4.88 | 3.04 ± 3.16 | 4.15* |
| Depression | 7.67 ± 5.65 | 2.96 ± 2.99 | 2.25*** |
| Alcohol use | 28 | 18 | 0.21b |
| Smoking | 5 | 0 | 3.75b |
| Mean FD | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.05 | 1.32 |
Mean ± SD are shown
Mean FD: the frame-wise displacement (FD) of head position
CIAS the score of Chinese Internet Addiction Scale
*** p < 0.001, * p < 0.05
nThere were only 7 of 24 HCs playing internet games
aMann–Whitney U test
bChi-square test
Fig. 1Regions of interest (ROIs) of NAcc (± 12, 8, −8, 6 mm radius) and VTA (0, −16, −7, 3 mm radius) in Talairach Daemon coordinate
Resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC, Fisher Z value) difference between IGD and HC
| The rsFC strength | IGD (n = 35) | HC (n = 24) |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left NAcc and VTA | 0.07 ± 0.06 | 0.12 ± 0.07 | −.54 | .591 | 0.15 |
| Right NAcc and VTA | 0.02 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.05 | −2.37* | .021 | 0.64 |
Mean ± SD are shown
Left NAcc and VTA means the rsFC strength between these two regions of interest
*p < 0.05
Fig. 2Resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) between the VTA and left/right NAcc. The label’ Left NAcc and VTA’ refers to the rsFC strength between these two regions of interest. Bars with oblique lines show the mean values of rsFC between the VTA and left/right NAcc in IGD, bars with dots show the mean value of rsFC between the VTA and left/right NAcc in HC, error bars the standard errors of the mean
Correlation between resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) strengths and CIAS/craving
| The rsFC strength | All participants (n = 59) | |
|---|---|---|
| CIAS | Craving | |
| Left NAcc and VTA | 0.00 ( | −0.03 ( |
| Right NAcc and VTA | −0.30* ( | −0.32* ( |
Left NAcc and VTA means the rsFC strength between these two regions of interest
*p < 0.05
Fig. 3Scatterplot showing association between right NAcc–VTA functional connectivity and subject craving across groups. Black squares indicate the values for IGD participants, black circles indicate the values for HC participants. Dotted line represents the best-fit regressions for all subjects