Literature DB >> 21453747

To gamble or not to gamble: at risk for craving and relapse--learned motivated attention in pathological gambling.

Klaus Wölfling1, Chantal P Mörsen, Eva Duven, Ulrike Albrecht, Sabine M Grüsser, Herta Flor.   

Abstract

In recent research similarities between pathological gambling and drug addiction have been identified, suggesting excessive gambling to constitute an addiction. So far, we have insufficient knowledge concerning the psychophysiological mechanisms underlying this kind of non-substance-related addiction. The objective of the study was to investigate emotional processing of gambling-relevant and -irrelevant stimuli in pathological gamblers and non-gambling controls using an EEG cue-reactivity paradigm. Whereas gambling-irrelevant stimuli were processed similarly in non-gambling controls (HC) and pathological gamblers (PG), PG showed significantly stronger gambling-relevant stimulus-induced psychophysiological cue-reactivity (larger gambling stimulus-induced late positive potential, LPP, higher arousal and more positively toned valence ratings as well as higher stimulus-induced craving for gambling cues compared to HC--but not the expectable increase of general craving over time and after stimulus presentation). Our findings suggest enhanced cue-reactivity in pathological gamblers indicative of learned motivated attention that may induce subjective craving and relapse.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21453747     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  18 in total

1.  Craving to smoke does not signify physical addiction: a comment on DiFranza et al. (2012).

Authors:  Reuven Dar; Hanan Frenk
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Attentional bias in problem gambling: a systematic review.

Authors:  Audhild Hønsi; Rune Aune Mentzoni; Helge Molde; Ståle Pallesen
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2013-09

3.  Quantifying individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Vedran Lovic; Benjamin T Saunders; Lindsay M Yager; Shelly B Flagel; Jonathan D Morrow; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Decreased functional connectivity between ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens in Internet gaming disorder: evidence from resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jin-Tao Zhang; Shan-Shan Ma; Sarah W Yip; Ling-Jiao Wang; Chao Chen; Chao-Gan Yan; Lu Liu; Ben Liu; Lin-Yuan Deng; Qin-Xue Liu; Xiao-Yi Fang
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.759

Review 5.  Getting a grip on problem gambling: what can neuroscience tell us?

Authors:  Anna E Goudriaan; Murat Yücel; Ruth J van Holst
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Altered reward processing in pathological computer gamers--ERP-results from a semi-natural gaming-design.

Authors:  Eva C P Duven; Kai W Müller; Manfred E Beutel; Klaus Wölfling
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  The relative contribution of metacognitions and attentional control to the severity of gambling in problem gamblers.

Authors:  Marcantonio M Spada; Adam Roarty
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2015-03-19

8.  The Impact of Negative Mood on Event-Related Potentials When Viewing Pornographic Pictures.

Authors:  Charlotte Markert; Andreas M Baranowski; Simon Koch; Rudolf Stark; Jana Strahler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-05

Review 9.  Brain Imaging in Gambling Disorder.

Authors:  Saskia Quester; Nina Romanczuk-Seiferth
Journal:  Curr Addict Rep       Date:  2015

10.  Risk assessment and reward processing in problem gambling investigated by event-related potentials and fMRI-constrained source analysis.

Authors:  Stephan F Miedl; Thorsten Fehr; Manfred Herrmann; Gerhard Meyer
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.