Literature DB >> 26582061

Comparison of Prediction Models for Lynch Syndrome Among Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

Fay Kastrinos1, Rohit P Ojha2, Celine Leenen2, Carmelita Alvero2, Rowena C Mercado2, Judith Balmaña2, Irene Valenzuela2, Francesc Balaguer2, Roger Green2, Noralane M Lindor2, Stephen N Thibodeau2, Polly Newcomb2, Aung Ko Win2, Mark Jenkins2, Daniel D Buchanan2, Lucio Bertario2, Paola Sala2, Heather Hampel2, Sapna Syngal2, Ewout W Steyerberg2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines recommend the Lynch Syndrome prediction models MMRPredict, MMRPro, and PREMM1,2,6 for the identification of MMR gene mutation carriers. We compared the predictive performance and clinical usefulness of these prediction models to identify mutation carriers.
METHODS: Pedigree data from CRC patients in 11 North American, European, and Australian cohorts (6 clinic- and 5 population-based sites) were used to calculate predicted probabilities of pathogenic MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 gene mutations by each model and gene-specific predictions by MMRPro and PREMM1,2,6. We examined discrimination with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration with observed to expected (O/E) ratio, and clinical usefulness using decision curve analysis to select patients for further evaluation. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Mutations were detected in 539 of 2304 (23%) individuals from the clinic-based cohorts (237 MLH1, 251 MSH2, 51 MSH6) and 150 of 3451 (4.4%) individuals from the population-based cohorts (47 MLH1, 71 MSH2, 32 MSH6). Discrimination was similar for clinic- and population-based cohorts: AUCs of 0.76 vs 0.77 for MMRPredict, 0.82 vs 0.85 for MMRPro, and 0.85 vs 0.88 for PREMM1,2,6. For clinic- and population-based cohorts, O/E deviated from 1 for MMRPredict (0.38 and 0.31, respectively) and MMRPro (0.62 and 0.36) but were more satisfactory for PREMM1,2,6 (1.0 and 0.70). MMRPro or PREMM1,2,6 predictions were clinically useful at thresholds of 5% or greater and in particular at greater than 15%.
CONCLUSIONS: MMRPro and PREMM1,2,6 can well be used to select CRC patients from genetics clinics or population-based settings for tumor and/or germline testing at a 5% or higher risk. If no MMR deficiency is detected and risk exceeds 15%, we suggest considering additional genetic etiologies for the cause of cancer in the family.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26582061      PMCID: PMC4862416          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  38 in total

Review 1.  Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Penny Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Afina S Glas; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  The International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (ICG-HNPCC).

Authors:  H F Vasen; J P Mecklin; P M Khan; H T Lynch
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Syndrome: meeting highlights and Bethesda guidelines.

Authors:  M A Rodriguez-Bigas; C R Boland; S R Hamilton; D E Henson; J R Jass; P M Khan; H Lynch; M Perucho; T Smyrk; L Sobin; S Srivastava
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-12-03       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset.

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Julie A Stephens; Eero Pukkala; Risto Sankila; Lauri A Aaltonen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Sining Chen; Wenyi Wang; Shing Lee; Khedoudja Nafa; Johanna Lee; Kathy Romans; Patrice Watson; Stephen B Gruber; David Euhus; Kenneth W Kinzler; Jeremy Jass; Steven Gallinger; Noralane M Lindor; Graham Casey; Nathan Ellis; Francis M Giardiello; Kenneth Offit; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Prediction of MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Judith Balmaña; David H Stockwell; Ewout W Steyerberg; Elena M Stoffel; Amie M Deffenbaugh; Julia E Reid; Brian Ward; Thomas Scholl; Brant Hendrickson; John Tazelaar; Lynn Anne Burbidge; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Accuracy of revised Bethesda guidelines, microsatellite instability, and immunohistochemistry for the identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Virgínia Piñol; Antoni Castells; Montserrat Andreu; Sergi Castellví-Bel; Cristina Alenda; Xavier Llor; Rosa M Xicola; Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta; Artemio Payá; Rodrigo Jover; Xavier Bessa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Wendy L Frankel; Edward Martin; Mark Arnold; Karamjit Khanduja; Philip Kuebler; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Kaisa Sotamaa; Thomas W Prior; Judith Westman; Jenny Panescu; Dan Fix; Janet Lockman; Ilene Comeras; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability.

Authors:  Asad Umar; C Richard Boland; Jonathan P Terdiman; Sapna Syngal; Albert de la Chapelle; Josef Rüschoff; Richard Fishel; Noralane M Lindor; Lawrence J Burgart; Richard Hamelin; Stanley R Hamilton; Robert A Hiatt; Jeremy Jass; Annika Lindblom; Henry T Lynch; Païvi Peltomaki; Scott D Ramsey; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Hans F A Vasen; Ernest T Hawk; J Carl Barrett; Andrew N Freedman; Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Identification and survival of carriers of mutations in DNA mismatch-repair genes in colon cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Barnetson; Albert Tenesa; Susan M Farrington; Iain D Nicholl; Roseanne Cetnarskyj; Mary E Porteous; Harry Campbell; Malcolm G Dunlop
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Hereditary Colorectal Polyposis and Cancer Syndromes: A Primer on Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Priyanka Kanth; Jade Grimmett; Marjan Champine; Randall Burt; N Jewel Samadder
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Development and Validation of the PREMM5 Model for Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Lynch Syndrome.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Hajime Uno; Chinedu Ukaegbu; Carmelita Alvero; Ashley McFarland; Matthew B Yurgelun; Matthew H Kulke; Deborah Schrag; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Charles S Fuchs; Robert J Mayer; Kimmie Ng; Ewout W Steyerberg; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations in Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew B Yurgelun; Matthew H Kulke; Charles S Fuchs; Brian A Allen; Hajime Uno; Jason L Hornick; Chinedu I Ukaegbu; Lauren K Brais; Philip G McNamara; Robert J Mayer; Deborah Schrag; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Kimmie Ng; John Kidd; Nanda Singh; Anne-Renee Hartman; Richard J Wenstrup; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Vishal Jindal
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-04

Review 5.  Recent progress in Lynch syndrome and other familial colorectal cancer syndromes.

Authors:  Patrick M Boland; Matthew B Yurgelun; C Richard Boland
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Advances in Hereditary Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancers.

Authors:  Meghan L Underhill; Katharine A Germansky; Matthew B Yurgelun
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 7.  Immune Checkpoints as a Target for Colorectal Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Alessandro Passardi; Matteo Canale; Martina Valgiusti; Paola Ulivi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Evaluation of current prediction models for Lynch syndrome: updating the PREMM5 model to identify PMS2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  A Goverde; M C W Spaander; D Nieboer; A M W van den Ouweland; W N M Dinjens; H J Dubbink; C J Tops; S W Ten Broeke; M J Bruno; R M W Hofstra; E W Steyerberg; A Wagner
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Molecular characterization of breast cancer: a potential novel immune-related lncRNAs signature.

Authors:  Jianguo Lai; Bo Chen; Guochun Zhang; Xuerui Li; Hsiaopei Mok; Ning Liao
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients up to 70 years of age.

Authors:  Celine H M Leenen; Anne Goverde; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Anja Wagner; Margot G F van Lier; Manon C W Spaander; Marco J Bruno; Carli M Tops; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Hendrikus J Dubbink; Ernst J Kuipers; Winand N M Dinjens; Monique E van Leerdam; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.