BACKGROUND: The identification of mutations in germ-line DNA mismatch-repair genes at the time of diagnosis of colorectal cancer is important in the management of the disease. METHODS: Without preselection and regardless of family history, we recruited 870 patients under the age of 55 years soon after they received a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. We studied these patients for germ-line mutations in the DNA mismatch-repair genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 and developed a two-stage model by multivariate logistic regression for the prediction of the presence of mutations in these genes. Stage 1 of the model incorporated only clinical variables; stage 2 comprised analysis of the tumor by immunohistochemical staining and tests for microsatellite instability. The model was validated in an independent population of patients. We analyzed 2938 patient-years of follow-up to determine whether genotype influenced survival. RESULTS: There were 38 mutations among the 870 participants (4 percent): 15 mutations in MLH1, 16 in MSH2, and 7 in MSH6. Carrier frequencies in men (6 percent) and women (3 percent) differed significantly (P<0.04). The addition of immunohistochemical analysis in stage 2 of the model had a sensitivity of 62 percent and a positive predictive value of 80 percent. There were 35 mutations in the validation series of 155 patients (23 percent): 19 mutations in MLH1, 13 in MSH2, and 3 in MSH6. The performance of the model was robust among a wide range of cutoff probabilities and was superior to that of the Bethesda and Amsterdam criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Survival among carriers was not significantly different from that among noncarriers. CONCLUSIONS: We devised and validated a method of identifying patients with colorectal cancer who are carriers of mutations in DNA repair genes. Survival was similar among carriers and noncarriers. Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
BACKGROUND: The identification of mutations in germ-line DNA mismatch-repair genes at the time of diagnosis of colorectal cancer is important in the management of the disease. METHODS: Without preselection and regardless of family history, we recruited 870 patients under the age of 55 years soon after they received a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. We studied these patients for germ-line mutations in the DNA mismatch-repair genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 and developed a two-stage model by multivariate logistic regression for the prediction of the presence of mutations in these genes. Stage 1 of the model incorporated only clinical variables; stage 2 comprised analysis of the tumor by immunohistochemical staining and tests for microsatellite instability. The model was validated in an independent population of patients. We analyzed 2938 patient-years of follow-up to determine whether genotype influenced survival. RESULTS: There were 38 mutations among the 870 participants (4 percent): 15 mutations in MLH1, 16 in MSH2, and 7 in MSH6. Carrier frequencies in men (6 percent) and women (3 percent) differed significantly (P<0.04). The addition of immunohistochemical analysis in stage 2 of the model had a sensitivity of 62 percent and a positive predictive value of 80 percent. There were 35 mutations in the validation series of 155 patients (23 percent): 19 mutations in MLH1, 13 in MSH2, and 3 in MSH6. The performance of the model was robust among a wide range of cutoff probabilities and was superior to that of the Bethesda and Amsterdam criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Survival among carriers was not significantly different from that among noncarriers. CONCLUSIONS: We devised and validated a method of identifying patients with colorectal cancer who are carriers of mutations in DNA repair genes. Survival was similar among carriers and noncarriers. Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Authors: María Dolores Giráldez; Francesc Balaguer; Luis Bujanda; Miriam Cuatrecasas; Jenifer Muñoz; Virginia Alonso-Espinaco; Mikel Larzabal; Anna Petit; Victoria Gonzalo; Teresa Ocaña; Leticia Moreira; José María Enríquez-Navascués; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel; Antoni Castells; Sergi Castellví-Bel Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: E Lastra; M García-González; B Llorente; C Bernuy; M J Barrio; L Pérez-Cabornero; M Durán; C García-Girón Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Fay Kastrinos; Ewout W Steyerberg; Rowena Mercado; Judith Balmaña; Spring Holter; Steven Gallinger; Kimberly D Siegmund; James M Church; Mark A Jenkins; Noralane M Lindor; Stephen N Thibodeau; Lynn Anne Burbidge; Richard J Wenstrup; Sapna Syngal Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Miguel Serrano; Pedro Lage; Sara Belga; Bruno Filipe; Inês Francisco; Paula Rodrigues; Ricardo Fonseca; Paula Chaves; Isabel Claro; Cristina Albuquerque; António Dias Pereira Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Amanda S Bruegl; Bojana Djordjevic; Brittany Batte; Molly Daniels; Bryan Fellman; Diana Urbauer; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Charlotte Sun; Karen H Lu; Russell R Broaddus Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2014-04-25
Authors: James G Dowty; Aung K Win; Daniel D Buchanan; Noralane M Lindor; Finlay A Macrae; Mark Clendenning; Yoland C Antill; Stephen N Thibodeau; Graham Casey; Steve Gallinger; Loic Le Marchand; Polly A Newcomb; Robert W Haile; Graeme P Young; Paul A James; Graham G Giles; Shanaka R Gunawardena; Barbara A Leggett; Michael Gattas; Alex Boussioutas; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron; Susan Parry; Jack Goldblatt; Joanne P Young; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 4.878