Literature DB >> 15855432

Accuracy of revised Bethesda guidelines, microsatellite instability, and immunohistochemistry for the identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Virgínia Piñol1, Antoni Castells, Montserrat Andreu, Sergi Castellví-Bel, Cristina Alenda, Xavier Llor, Rosa M Xicola, Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta, Artemio Payá, Rodrigo Jover, Xavier Bessa.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The selection of individuals for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) genetic testing is challenging. Recently, the National Cancer Institute outlined a new set of recommendations, the revised Bethesda guidelines, for the identification of individuals with HNPCC who should be tested for microsatellite instability.
OBJECTIVE: To establish the most effective and efficient strategy for the detection of MSH2/MLH1 gene carriers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A prospective, multicenter, nationwide study (the EPICOLON study) in 20 hospitals in the general community in Spain of 1222 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer between November 1, 2000, and October 31, 2001.
INTERVENTIONS: Microsatellite instability testing and MSH2/MLH1 immunostaining in all patients regardless of age, personal or family history, and tumor characteristics. Patients whose tumors exhibited microsatellite instability and/or lack of protein expression underwent MSH2/MLH1 germline testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effectiveness and efficiency of both microsatellite instability testing and immunostaining, either directly or previous selection of patients according to the revised Bethesda guidelines, were evaluated with respect to the presence of MSH2/MLH1 germline mutations.
RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-seven patients (23.5%) fulfilled the revised Bethesda guidelines. Ninety-one patients (7.4%) had a mismatch repair deficiency, with tumors exhibiting either microsatellite instability (n = 83) or loss of protein expression (n = 81). Germline testing identified 11 mutations (0.9%) in either MSH2 (7 cases) or MLH1 (4 cases) genes. Strategies based on either microsatellite instability testing or immunostaining previous selection of patients according to the revised Bethesda guidelines were the most effective (sensitivity, 81.8% and 81.8%; specificity, 98.0% and 98.2%; positive predictive value, 27.3% and 29.0%, respectively) to identify MSH2/MLH1 gene carriers. Logistic regression analysis confirmed the revised Bethesda guidelines as the most discriminating set of clinical parameters (odds ratio, 33.3; 95% confidence interval, 4.3-250; P = .001).
CONCLUSION: The revised Bethesda guidelines constitute a useful approach to identify patients at risk for HNPCC. In patients fulfilling these criteria, both microsatellite instability testing and immunostaining are equivalent and highly effective strategies to further select those patients who should be tested for MSH2/MLH1 germline mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15855432     DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.16.1986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  164 in total

1.  MSH6 and MUTYH deficiency is a frequent event in early-onset colorectal cancer.

Authors:  María Dolores Giráldez; Francesc Balaguer; Luis Bujanda; Miriam Cuatrecasas; Jenifer Muñoz; Virginia Alonso-Espinaco; Mikel Larzabal; Anna Petit; Victoria Gonzalo; Teresa Ocaña; Leticia Moreira; José María Enríquez-Navascués; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel; Antoni Castells; Sergi Castellví-Bel
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  The revised Bethesda guidelines: extent of utilization in a university hospital medical center with a cancer genetics program.

Authors:  Aparna Mukherjee; Thomas J McGarrity; Francesca Ruggiero; Walter Koltun; Kevin McKenna; Lisa Poritz; Maria J Baker
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.857

3.  Identification of mismatch repair gene mutations in young patients with colorectal cancer and in patients with multiple tumours associated with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R C Niessen; M J W Berends; Y Wu; R H Sijmons; H Hollema; M J L Ligtenberg; H E K de Walle; E G E de Vries; A Karrenbeld; C H C M Buys; A G J van der Zee; R M W Hofstra; J H Kleibeuker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Lynch syndrome diagnostics: decision-making process for germ-line testing.

Authors:  E Lastra; M García-González; B Llorente; C Bernuy; M J Barrio; L Pérez-Cabornero; M Durán; C García-Girón
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Germline mutation analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 in Malaysian Lynch syndrome patients.

Authors:  Mohd Nizam Zahary; Gurjeet Kaur; Muhammad Radzi Abu Hassan; Harjinder Singh; Venkatesh R Naik; Ravindran Ankathil
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  EPCAM germ line deletions as causes of Lynch syndrome in Spanish patients.

Authors:  Carla Guarinos; Adela Castillejo; Víctor-Manuel Barberá; Lucía Pérez-Carbonell; Ana-Beatriz Sánchez-Heras; Angel Segura; Carmen Guillén-Ponce; Ana Martínez-Cantó; María-Isabel Castillejo; Cecilia-Magdalena Egoavil; Rodrigo Jover; Artemio Payá; Cristina Alenda; José-Luís Soto
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 7.  Lower gastrointestinal tract cancer predisposition syndromes.

Authors:  Neel B Shah; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.722

Review 8.  New genes emerging for colorectal cancer predisposition.

Authors:  Clara Esteban-Jurado; Pilar Garre; Maria Vila; Juan José Lozano; Anna Pristoupilova; Sergi Beltrán; Anna Abulí; Jenifer Muñoz; Francesc Balaguer; Teresa Ocaña; Antoni Castells; Josep M Piqué; Angel Carracedo; Clara Ruiz-Ponte; Xavier Bessa; Montserrat Andreu; Luis Bujanda; Trinidad Caldés; Sergi Castellví-Bel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Lynch Syndrome in patients with clear cell and endometrioid cancers of the ovary.

Authors:  Koah R Vierkoetter; Asia R Ayabe; Maya VanDrunen; Hyeong Jun Ahn; David M Shimizu; Keith Y Terada
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  A genome-wide association study on copy-number variation identifies a 11q11 loss as a candidate susceptibility variant for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C Fernandez-Rozadilla; J B Cazier; I Tomlinson; A Brea-Fernández; M J Lamas; M Baiget; L A López-Fernández; J Clofent; L Bujanda; D Gonzalez; L de Castro; K Hemminki; X Bessa; M Andreu; R Jover; R Xicola; X Llor; V Moreno; A Castells; S Castellví-Bel; A Carracedo; C Ruiz-Ponte
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.