Literature DB >> 17003396

Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome.

Sining Chen1, Wenyi Wang, Shing Lee, Khedoudja Nafa, Johanna Lee, Kathy Romans, Patrice Watson, Stephen B Gruber, David Euhus, Kenneth W Kinzler, Jeremy Jass, Steven Gallinger, Noralane M Lindor, Graham Casey, Nathan Ellis, Francis M Giardiello, Kenneth Offit, Giovanni Parmigiani.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Identifying families at high risk for the Lynch syndrome (ie, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) is critical for both genetic counseling and cancer prevention. Current clinical guidelines are effective but limited by applicability and cost.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a genetic counseling and risk prediction tool that estimates the probability of carrying a deleterious mutation in mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 and the probability of developing colorectal or endometrial cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: External validation of the MMRpro model was conducted on 279 individuals from 226 clinic-based families in the United States, Canada, and Australia (referred between 1993-2005) by comparing model predictions with results of highly sensitive germline mutation detection techniques. MMRpro models the autosomal dominant inheritance of mismatch repair mutations, with parameters based on meta-analyses of the penetrance and prevalence of mutations and of the predictive values of tumor characteristics. The model's prediction is tailored to each individual's detailed family history information on colorectal and endometrial cancer and to tumor characteristics including microsatellite instability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Ability of MMRpro to correctly predict mutation carrier status, as measured by operating characteristics, calibration, and overall accuracy.
RESULTS: In the independent validation, MMRpro provided a concordance index of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.88) and a ratio of observed to predicted cases of 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.05). This results in higher accuracy than existing alternatives and current clinical guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: MMRpro is a broadly applicable, accurate prediction model that can contribute to current screening and genetic counseling practices in a high-risk population. It is more sensitive and more specific than existing clinical guidelines for identifying individuals who may benefit from MMR germline testing. It is applicable to individuals for whom tumor samples are not available and to individuals in whom germline testing finds no mutation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17003396      PMCID: PMC2538673          DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.12.1479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  65 in total

1.  Microsatellite instability in adenomas as a marker for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Loukola; R Salovaara; P Kristo; A L Moisio; H Kääriäinen; H Ahtola; M Eskelinen; N Härkönen; R Julkunen; E Kangas; S Ojala; J Tulikoura; E Valkamo; H Järvinen; J P Mecklin; A de la Chapelle; L A Aaltonen
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Value of immunohistochemical detection of DNA mismatch repair proteins in predicting germline mutation in hereditary colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Jinru Shia; David S Klimstra; Khedoudja Nafa; Kenneth Offit; Jose G Guillem; Arnold J Markowitz; William L Gerald; Nathan A Ellis
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset.

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Julie A Stephens; Eero Pukkala; Risto Sankila; Lauri A Aaltonen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Frequency of loss of hMLH1 expression in colorectal carcinoma increases with advancing age.

Authors:  Sanjay Kakar; Lawrence J Burgart; Stephen N Thibodeau; Kari G Rabe; Gloria M Petersen; Richard M Goldberg; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data.

Authors:  R C Elston; J Stewart
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 0.444

6.  Microsatellite instability in colorectal-cancer patients with suspected genetic predisposition.

Authors:  D Calistri; S Presciuttini; G Buonsanti; P Radice; I Gazzoli; V Pensotti; P Sala; M Eboli; S Andreola; A Russo; M Pierotti; L Bertario; G N Ranzani
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Microsatellite instability-a useful diagnostic tool to select patients at high risk for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: a study in different groups of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C Lamberti; R Kruse; C Ruelfs; R Caspari; Y Wang; M Jungck; M Mathiak; H R Malayeri; W Friedl; T Sauerbruch; P Propping
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Penetrance and expressivity of MSH6 germline mutations in seven kindreds not ascertained by family history.

Authors:  Barbara M Buttin; Matthew A Powell; David G Mutch; Sheri A Babb; Phyllis C Huettner; Tina Bocker Edmonston; Thomas J Herzog; Janet S Rader; Randall K Gibb; Alison J Whelan; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  MSH6 germline mutations are rare in colorectal cancer families.

Authors:  Paolo Peterlongo; Khedoudja Nafa; Gabriel S Lerman; Emily Glogowski; Jinru Shia; Tian Z Ye; Arnold J Markowitz; José G Guillem; Prema Kolachana; Jeffrey A Boyd; Kenneth Offit; Nathan A Ellis
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  140 in total

1.  Determining the frequency of de novo germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes.

Authors:  Aung Ko Win; Mark A Jenkins; Daniel D Buchanan; Mark Clendenning; Joanne P Young; Graham G Giles; Jack Goldblatt; Barbara A Leggett; John L Hopper; Stephen N Thibodeau; Noralane M Lindor
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Risk of endometrial cancer for women diagnosed with HNPCC-related colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Andreas Obermair; Danny R Youlden; Joanne P Young; Noralane M Lindor; John A Baron; Polly Newcomb; Susan Parry; John L Hopper; Robert Haile; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 3.  Lynch syndrome diagnostics: decision-making process for germ-line testing.

Authors:  E Lastra; M García-González; B Llorente; C Bernuy; M J Barrio; L Pérez-Cabornero; M Durán; C García-Girón
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  The PREMM(1,2,6) model predicts risk of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 germline mutations based on cancer history.

Authors:  Fay Kastrinos; Ewout W Steyerberg; Rowena Mercado; Judith Balmaña; Spring Holter; Steven Gallinger; Kimberly D Siegmund; James M Church; Mark A Jenkins; Noralane M Lindor; Stephen N Thibodeau; Lynn Anne Burbidge; Richard J Wenstrup; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Bethesda criteria for microsatellite instability testing: impact on the detection of new cases of Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Miguel Serrano; Pedro Lage; Sara Belga; Bruno Filipe; Inês Francisco; Paula Rodrigues; Ricardo Fonseca; Paula Chaves; Isabel Claro; Cristina Albuquerque; António Dias Pereira
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Successful matched sibling cord blood transplant for ALL in a child with constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome.

Authors:  J A Heath; M Campbell; K Tiedemann; P A Downie
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Risks of colorectal and other cancers after endometrial cancer for women with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Aung Ko Win; Noralane M Lindor; Ingrid Winship; Katherine M Tucker; Daniel D Buchanan; Joanne P Young; Christophe Rosty; Barbara Leggett; Graham G Giles; Jack Goldblatt; Finlay A Macrae; Susan Parry; Matthew F Kalady; John A Baron; Dennis J Ahnen; Loic Le Marchand; Steven Gallinger; Robert W Haile; Polly A Newcomb; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Evaluation of clinical criteria for the identification of Lynch syndrome among unselected patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Amanda S Bruegl; Bojana Djordjevic; Brittany Batte; Molly Daniels; Bryan Fellman; Diana Urbauer; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Charlotte Sun; Karen H Lu; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-04-25

Review 9.  Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: molecular genetics, genetic counseling, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Henry T Lynch; Jane F Lynch; Patrick M Lynch; Thomas Attard
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Self administered screening for hereditary cancers in conjunction with mammography and ultrasound.

Authors:  Charles H McDonnell; David J Seidenwurm; Diana E McDonnell; Kristie A Bobolis
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.