Literature DB >> 15872200

Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).

Heather Hampel1, Wendy L Frankel, Edward Martin, Mark Arnold, Karamjit Khanduja, Philip Kuebler, Hidewaki Nakagawa, Kaisa Sotamaa, Thomas W Prior, Judith Westman, Jenny Panescu, Dan Fix, Janet Lockman, Ilene Comeras, Albert de la Chapelle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Germ-line mutations in the mismatch-repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 lead to the development of the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer), conferring a strong susceptibility to cancer. We assessed the frequency of such mutations in patients with colorectal cancer and examined strategies for molecular screening to identify patients with the syndrome.
METHODS: Patients with a new diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma at the major hospitals in metropolitan Columbus, Ohio, were eligible for the study. Genotyping of the tumor for microsatellite instability was the primary screening method. Among patients whose screening results were positive for microsatellite instability, we searched for germ-line mutations in the MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 genes with the use of immunohistochemical staining for mismatch-repair proteins, genomic sequencing, and deletion studies. Family members of carriers of the mutations were counseled, and those found to be at risk were offered mutation testing.
RESULTS: Of 1066 patients enrolled in the study, 208 (19.5 percent) had microsatellite instability, and 23 of these patients had a mutation causing the Lynch syndrome (2.2 percent). Among the 23 probands with the Lynch syndrome, 10 were more than 50 years of age and 5 did not meet the Amsterdam criteria or the Bethesda guidelines for the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (including the use of age and family history to identify patients at high risk for the Lynch syndrome). Genotyping for microsatellite instability alone and immunohistochemical analysis alone each failed to identify two probands. In the families of 21 of the probands, 117 persons at risk were tested, and of these, 52 had Lynch syndrome mutations and 65 did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine molecular screening of patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma for the Lynch syndrome identified mutations in patients and their family members that otherwise would not have been detected. These data suggest that the effectiveness of screening with immunohistochemical analysis of the mismatch-repair proteins would be similar to that of the more complex strategy of genotyping for microsatellite instability. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15872200     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa043146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  451 in total

1.  Microsatellite instability testing in Korean patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jung Ryul Oh; Duck-Woo Kim; Hye Seung Lee; Hee Eun Lee; Sung Min Lee; Je-Ho Jang; Sung-Bum Kang; Ja-Lok Ku; Seung-Yong Jeong; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  The inherited genetics of ovarian and endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Simon A Gayther; Paul D P Pharoah
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  MSH6 and MUTYH deficiency is a frequent event in early-onset colorectal cancer.

Authors:  María Dolores Giráldez; Francesc Balaguer; Luis Bujanda; Miriam Cuatrecasas; Jenifer Muñoz; Virginia Alonso-Espinaco; Mikel Larzabal; Anna Petit; Victoria Gonzalo; Teresa Ocaña; Leticia Moreira; José María Enríquez-Navascués; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel; Antoni Castells; Sergi Castellví-Bel
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer molecular biology moves into clinical practice.

Authors:  Colin C Pritchard; William M Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  How Can Next-Generation Sequencing (Genomics) Help Us in Treating Colorectal Cancer?

Authors:  Kristen K Ciombor; Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Richard M Goldberg
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  Identification of mismatch repair gene mutations in young patients with colorectal cancer and in patients with multiple tumours associated with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R C Niessen; M J W Berends; Y Wu; R H Sijmons; H Hollema; M J L Ligtenberg; H E K de Walle; E G E de Vries; A Karrenbeld; C H C M Buys; A G J van der Zee; R M W Hofstra; J H Kleibeuker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing.

Authors:  Daniel D Buchanan; Yen Y Tan; Michael D Walsh; Mark Clendenning; Alexander M Metcalf; Kaltin Ferguson; Sven T Arnold; Bryony A Thompson; Felicity A Lose; Michael T Parsons; Rhiannon J Walters; Sally-Ann Pearson; Margaret Cummings; Martin K Oehler; Penelope B Blomfield; Michael A Quinn; Judy A Kirk; Colin J Stewart; Andreas Obermair; Joanne P Young; Penelope M Webb; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Evaluation of clinical criteria for the identification of Lynch syndrome among unselected patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Amanda S Bruegl; Bojana Djordjevic; Brittany Batte; Molly Daniels; Bryan Fellman; Diana Urbauer; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Charlotte Sun; Karen H Lu; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-04-25

9.  Histology of colorectal adenocarcinoma with double somatic mismatch-repair mutations is indistinguishable from those caused by Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Jessica A Hemminger; Rachel Pearlman; Sigurdis Haraldsdottir; Deborah Knight; Jon Gunnlaugur Jonasson; Colin C Pritchard; Heather Hampel; Wendy L Frankel
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.466

10.  Risk factors for developing endometrial cancer after benign endometrial sampling.

Authors:  Michelle L Torres; Amy L Weaver; Sanjeev Kumar; Stefano Uccella; Abimbola O Famuyide; William A Cliby; Sean C Dowdy; Bobbie S Gostout; Andrea Mariani
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.