Literature DB >> 26561306

Multiple-trait- and selection indices-genomic predictions for grain yield and protein content in rye for feeding purposes.

Albert Wilhelm Schulthess1, Yu Wang2,3, Thomas Miedaner4, Peer Wilde5, Jochen C Reif6, Yusheng Zhao7.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Exploiting the benefits from multiple-trait genomic selection for protein content prediction relying on additional grain yield information within training sets is a realistic genomic selection approach in rye breeding. ABSTRACT: Multiple-trait genomic selection (MTGS) was specially designed to benefit from the information of genetically correlated indicator traits in order to improve genomic prediction accuracies. Two segregating F3:4 rye testcross populations genotyped using diversity array technology markers and evaluated for grain yield (GY) and protein content (PC) were considered. The aims of our study were to explore the benefits of MTGS over single-trait genomic selection (STGS) for GY and PC prediction and to apply GS to predict different selection indices (SIs) for GY and PC improvement. Our results using a two-trait model (2TGS) empirically confirm that the ideal scenario to exploit the benefits of MTGS would be when the predictions of a relatively low heritable target trait with scarce phenotypic records are supported by an intensively phenotyped genetically correlated indicator trait which has higher heritability. This ideal scenario is expected for PC in practice. According to our GS implementation, MTGS can be performed in order to achieve more cycles of selection by unit of time. If the aim is to exclusively improve the prediction accuracy of a scarcely phenotyped trait, 2TGS will be a more accurate approach than a three-trait model which incorporates an additional correlated indicator trait. In general for balanced phenotypic information, we recommend to perform GS considering SIs as single traits, this method being a simple, direct and efficient way of prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26561306     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-015-2626-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  31 in total

1.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.

Authors:  C R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The Genetic Basis for Constructing Selection Indexes.

Authors:  L N Hazel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1943-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins.

Authors:  S Tsuruta; I Misztal; I Aguilar; T J Lawlor
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Hybrid rye performance under natural drought stress in Europe.

Authors:  Marlen Hübner; Peer Wilde; Brigitta Schmiedchen; Pawel Dopierala; Manje Gowda; Jochen C Reif; Thomas Miedaner
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Association mapping and genomic prediction for resistance to sudden death syndrome in early maturing soybean germplasm.

Authors:  Yong Bao; James E Kurle; Grace Anderson; Nevin D Young
Journal:  Mol Breed       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 2.589

8.  Effectiveness of genomic prediction of maize hybrid performance in different breeding populations and environments.

Authors:  Vanessa S Windhausen; Gary N Atlin; John M Hickey; Jose Crossa; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E Sorrells; Babu Raman; Jill E Cairns; Amsal Tarekegne; Kassa Semagn; Yoseph Beyene; Pichet Grudloyma; Frank Technow; Christian Riedelsheimer; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  A Bayesian method and its variational approximation for prediction of genomic breeding values in multiple traits.

Authors:  Takeshi Hayashi; Hiroyoshi Iwata
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Genotyping by sequencing for genomic prediction in a soybean breeding population.

Authors:  Diego Jarquín; Kyle Kocak; Luis Posadas; Katie Hyma; Joseph Jedlicka; George Graef; Aaron Lorenz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  29 in total

1.  Genomic Prediction Using Individual-Level Data and Summary Statistics from Multiple Populations.

Authors:  Jeremie Vandenplas; Mario P L Calus; Gregor Gorjanc
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Predicting rice hybrid performance using univariate and multivariate GBLUP models based on North Carolina mating design II.

Authors:  X Wang; L Li; Z Yang; X Zheng; S Yu; C Xu; Z Hu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Comparison of single-trait and multi-trait genomic predictions on agronomic and disease resistance traits in spring wheat.

Authors:  Kassa Semagn; José Crossa; Jaime Cuevas; Muhammad Iqbal; Izabela Ciechanowska; Maria Antonia Henriquez; Harpinder Randhawa; Brian L Beres; Reem Aboukhaddour; Brent D McCallum; Anita L Brûlé-Babel; Amidou N'Diaye; Curtis Pozniak; Dean Spaner
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.574

4.  Genomic Prediction Strategies for Dry-Down-Related Traits in Maize.

Authors:  Pengzun Ni; Mahlet Teka Anche; Yanye Ruan; Dongdong Dang; Nicolas Morales; Lingyue Li; Meiling Liu; Shu Wang; Kelly R Robbins
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Improving Genomic Prediction Using High-Dimensional Secondary Phenotypes.

Authors:  Bader Arouisse; Tom P J M Theeuwen; Fred A van Eeuwijk; Willem Kruijer
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  DArT Markers Effectively Target Gene Space in the Rye Genome.

Authors:  Piotr Gawroński; Magdalena Pawełkowicz; Katarzyna Tofil; Grzegorz Uszyński; Saida Sharifova; Shivaksh Ahluwalia; Mirosław Tyrka; Maria Wędzony; Andrzej Kilian; Hanna Bolibok-Brągoszewska
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Genomic assisted selection for enhancing line breeding: merging genomic and phenotypic selection in winter wheat breeding programs with preliminary yield trials.

Authors:  Sebastian Michel; Christian Ametz; Huseyin Gungor; Batuhan Akgöl; Doru Epure; Heinrich Grausgruber; Franziska Löschenberger; Hermann Buerstmayr
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  A roadmap for breeding orphan leafy vegetable species: a case study of Gynandropsis gynandra (Cleomaceae).

Authors:  E O Deedi Sogbohossou; Enoch G Achigan-Dako; Patrick Maundu; Svein Solberg; Edgar M S Deguenon; Rita H Mumm; Iago Hale; Allen Van Deynze; M Eric Schranz
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 6.793

9.  A predictive assessment of genetic correlations between traits in chickens using markers.

Authors:  Mehdi Momen; Ahmad Ayatollahi Mehrgardi; Ayoub Sheikhy; Ali Esmailizadeh; Masood Asadi Fozi; Andreas Kranis; Bruno D Valente; Guilherme J M Rosa; Daniel Gianola
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Advantages and limitations of multiple-trait genomic prediction for Fusarium head blight severity in hybrid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Albert W Schulthess; Yusheng Zhao; C Friedrich H Longin; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.