Literature DB >> 27649618

Predicting rice hybrid performance using univariate and multivariate GBLUP models based on North Carolina mating design II.

X Wang1, L Li2, Z Yang1, X Zheng3, S Yu4, C Xu1, Z Hu3.   

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) is more efficient than traditional phenotype-based methods in hybrid breeding. The present study investigated the predictive ability of genomic best linear unbiased prediction models for rice hybrids based on the North Carolina mating design II, in which a total of 115 inbred rice lines were crossed with 5 male sterile lines. Using 8 traits of the 575 (115 × 5) hybrids from two environments, both univariate (UV) and multivariate (MV) prediction analyses, including additive and dominance effects, were performed. Using UV models, the prediction results of cross-validation indicated that including dominance effects could improve the predictive ability for some traits in rice hybrids. Additionally, we could take advantage of GS even for a low-heritability trait, such as grain yield per plant (GY), because a modest increase in the number of top selection could generate a higher, more stable mean phenotypic value for rice hybrids. Thus this strategy was used to select superior potential crosses between the 115 inbred lines and those between the 5 male sterile lines and other genotyped varieties. In our MV research, an MV model (MV-ADV) was developed utilizing a MV relationship matrix constructed with auxiliary variates. Based on joint analysis with multi-trait (MT) or with multi-environment, the prediction results confirmed the superiority of MV-ADV over an UV model, particularly in the MT scenario for a low-heritability target trait (such as GY), with highly correlated auxiliary traits. For a high-heritability trait (such as thousand-grain weight), MT prediction is unnecessary, and UV prediction is sufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27649618      PMCID: PMC5315526          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  29 in total

1.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Multi-trait and multi-environment QTL analyses of yield and a set of physiological traits in pepper.

Authors:  N A Alimi; M C A M Bink; J A Dieleman; J J Magán; A M Wubs; A Palloix; F A van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Multiple quantitative trait analysis using bayesian networks.

Authors:  Marco Scutari; Phil Howell; David J Balding; Ian Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.).

Authors:  M F R Resende; P Muñoz; M D V Resende; D J Garrick; R L Fernando; J M Davis; E J Jokela; T A Martin; G F Peter; M Kirst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The Usage of an SNP-SNP Relationship Matrix for Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) Analysis Using a Community-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Young-Sup Lee; Hyeon-Jeong Kim; Seoae Cho; Heebal Kim
Journal:  Genomics Inform       Date:  2014-12-31

6.  Accuracy of whole-genome prediction using a genetic architecture-enhanced variance-covariance matrix.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Malena Erbe; Jinlong He; Ulrike Ober; Ning Gao; Hao Zhang; Henner Simianer; Jiaqi Li
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Genomic analysis of hybrid rice varieties reveals numerous superior alleles that contribute to heterosis.

Authors:  Xuehui Huang; Shihua Yang; Junyi Gong; Yan Zhao; Qi Feng; Hao Gong; Wenjun Li; Qilin Zhan; Benyi Cheng; Junhui Xia; Neng Chen; Zhongna Hao; Kunyan Liu; Chuanrang Zhu; Tao Huang; Qiang Zhao; Lei Zhang; Danlin Fan; Congcong Zhou; Yiqi Lu; Qijun Weng; Zi-Xuan Wang; Jiayang Li; Bin Han
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  SNP-Seek database of SNPs derived from 3000 rice genomes.

Authors:  Nickolai Alexandrov; Shuaishuai Tai; Wensheng Wang; Locedie Mansueto; Kevin Palis; Roven Rommel Fuentes; Victor Jun Ulat; Dmytro Chebotarov; Gengyun Zhang; Zhikang Li; Ramil Mauleon; Ruaraidh Sackville Hamilton; Kenneth L McNally
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Accuracy of across-environment genome-wide prediction in maize nested association mapping populations.

Authors:  Zhigang Guo; Dominic M Tucker; Daolong Wang; Christopher J Basten; Elhan Ersoz; William H Briggs; Jianwei Lu; Min Li; Gilles Gay
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  A Bayesian method and its variational approximation for prediction of genomic breeding values in multiple traits.

Authors:  Takeshi Hayashi; Hiroyoshi Iwata
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  35 in total

1.  Prediction and association mapping of agronomic traits in maize using multiple omic data.

Authors:  Y Xu; C Xu; S Xu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  A new genomic prediction method with additive-dominance effects in the least-squares framework.

Authors:  Hailan Liu; Guo-Bo Chen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Accuracy of genomic selection to predict maize single-crosses obtained through different mating designs.

Authors:  Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Deniz Akdemir; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Genome-wide association mapping and genomic prediction of yield-related traits and starch pasting properties in cassava.

Authors:  Chalermpol Phumichai; Pornsak Aiemnaka; Piyaporn Nathaisong; Sirikan Hunsawattanakul; Phasakorn Fungfoo; Chareinsuk Rojanaridpiched; Vichan Vichukit; Pasajee Kongsil; Piya Kittipadakul; Wannasiri Wannarat; Julapark Chunwongse; Pumipat Tongyoo; Chookiat Kijkhunasatian; Sunee Chotineeranat; Kuakoon Piyachomkwan; Marnin D Wolfe; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 5.  Advances in integrated genomic selection for rapid genetic gain in crop improvement: a review.

Authors:  C Anilkumar; N C Sunitha; Narayana Bhat Devate; S Ramesh
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.540

Review 6.  Genomic Prediction: Progress and Perspectives for Rice Improvement.

Authors:  Jérôme Bartholomé; Parthiban Thathapalli Prakash; Joshua N Cobb
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

7.  Incorporation of parental phenotypic data into multi-omic models improves prediction of yield-related traits in hybrid rice.

Authors:  Yang Xu; Yue Zhao; Xin Wang; Ying Ma; Pengcheng Li; Zefeng Yang; Xuecai Zhang; Chenwu Xu; Shizhong Xu
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 9.803

8.  Modeling copy number variation in the genomic prediction of maize hybrids.

Authors:  Danilo Hottis Lyra; Giovanni Galli; Filipe Couto Alves; Ítalo Stefanine Correia Granato; Miriam Suzane Vidotti; Massaine Bandeira E Sousa; Júlia Silva Morosini; José Crossa; Roberto Fritsche-Neto
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 9.  Fifty years of a public cassava breeding program: evolution of breeding objectives, methods, and decision-making processes.

Authors:  Hernán Ceballos; Clair Hershey; Carlos Iglesias; Xiaofei Zhang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Advantages and limitations of multiple-trait genomic prediction for Fusarium head blight severity in hybrid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Albert W Schulthess; Yusheng Zhao; C Friedrich H Longin; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.