Literature DB >> 35737008

Comparison of single-trait and multi-trait genomic predictions on agronomic and disease resistance traits in spring wheat.

Kassa Semagn1, José Crossa2, Jaime Cuevas3, Muhammad Iqbal4, Izabela Ciechanowska4, Maria Antonia Henriquez5, Harpinder Randhawa6, Brian L Beres6, Reem Aboukhaddour6, Brent D McCallum5, Anita L Brûlé-Babel7, Amidou N'Diaye8, Curtis Pozniak8, Dean Spaner9.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: This study performed comprehensive analyses on the predictive abilities of single-trait and two multi-trait models in three populations. Our results demonstrated the superiority of multi-traits over single-trait models across seven agronomic and four to seven disease resistance traits of different genetic architecture. The predictive ability of multi-trait and single-trait prediction models has not been investigated on diverse traits evaluated under organic and conventional management systems. Here, we compared the predictive abilities of 25% of a testing set that has not been evaluated for a single trait (ST), not evaluated for multi-traits (MT1), and evaluated for some traits but not others (MT2) in three spring wheat populations genotyped either with the wheat 90K single nucleotide polymorphisms array or DArTseq. Analyses were performed on seven agronomic traits evaluated under conventional and organic management systems, four to seven disease resistance traits, and all agronomic and disease resistance traits simultaneously. The average prediction accuracies of the ST, MT1, and MT2 models varied from 0.03 to 0.78 (mean 0.41), from 0.05 to 0.82 (mean 0.47), and from 0.05 to 0.92 (mean 0.67), respectively. The predictive ability of the MT2 model was significantly greater than the ST model in all traits and populations except common bunt with the MT1 model being intermediate between them. The MT2 model increased prediction accuracies over the ST and MT1 models in all traits by 9.0-82.4% (mean 37.3%) and 2.9-82.5% (mean 25.7%), respectively, except common bunt that showed up to 7.7% smaller accuracies in two populations. A joint analysis of all agronomic and disease resistance traits further improved accuracies within the MT1 and MT2 models on average by 21.4% and 17.4%, respectively, as compared to either the agronomic or disease resistance traits, demonstrating the high potential of the multi-traits models in improving prediction accuracies.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35737008     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-022-04147-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.574


  64 in total

1.  A pseudo-response regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  James Beales; Adrian Turner; Simon Griffiths; John W Snape; David A Laurie
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genome-Wide Association Analysis and Genomic Prediction for Adult-Plant Resistance to Septoria Tritici Blotch and Powdery Mildew in Winter Wheat.

Authors:  Admas Alemu; Gintaras Brazauskas; David S Gaikpa; Tina Henriksson; Bulat Islamov; Lise Nistrup Jørgensen; Mati Koppel; Reine Koppel; Žilvinas Liatukas; Jan T Svensson; Aakash Chawade
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Accuracy of multi-trait genomic selection using different methods.

Authors:  Mario P L Calus; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Association mapping and genomic prediction for resistance to sudden death syndrome in early maturing soybean germplasm.

Authors:  Yong Bao; James E Kurle; Grace Anderson; Nevin D Young
Journal:  Mol Breed       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 2.589

Review 5.  The Power of CRISPR-Cas9-Induced Genome Editing to Speed Up Plant Breeding.

Authors:  Hieu X Cao; Wenqin Wang; Hien T T Le; Giang T H Vu
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  Multi-trait random regression models increase genomic prediction accuracy for a temporal physiological trait derived from high-throughput phenotyping.

Authors:  Toshimi Baba; Mehdi Momen; Malachy T Campbell; Harkamal Walia; Gota Morota
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat.

Authors:  Kyle Brasier; Brian Ward; Jared Smith; John Seago; Joseph Oakes; Maria Balota; Paul Davis; Myron Fountain; Gina Brown-Guedira; Clay Sneller; Wade Thomason; Carl Griffey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with leaf rust resistance in five spring wheat populations using single nucleotide polymorphism markers.

Authors:  Firdissa E Bokore; Ron E Knox; Richard D Cuthbert; Curtis J Pozniak; Brent D McCallum; Amidou N'Diaye; Ron M DePauw; Heather L Campbell; Catherine Munro; Arti Singh; Colin W Hiebert; Curt A McCartney; Andrew G Sharpe; Asheesh K Singh; Dean Spaner; D B Fowler; Yuefeng Ruan; Samia Berraies; Brad Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparing the Potential of Marker-Assisted Selection and Genomic Prediction for Improving Rust Resistance in Hybrid Wheat.

Authors:  Ulrike Beukert; Patrick Thorwarth; Yusheng Zhao; C Friedrich H Longin; Albrecht Serfling; Frank Ordon; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  1 in total

1.  Identification of Spring Wheat with Superior Agronomic Performance under Contrasting Nitrogen Managements Using Linear Phenotypic Selection Indices.

Authors:  Muhammad Iqbal; Kassa Semagn; J Jesus Céron-Rojas; José Crossa; Diego Jarquin; Reka Howard; Brian L Beres; Klaus Strenzke; Izabela Ciechanowska; Dean Spaner
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.