Literature DB >> 26559538

An experimental study about haptic feedback in robotic surgery: may visual feedback substitute tactile feedback?

Giuseppe Meccariello1, Federico Faedi2,3, Saleh AlGhamdi2,4, Filippo Montevecchi2, Elisabetta Firinu2,5, Claudia Zanotti2, Davide Cavaliere6, Roberta Gunelli7, Marco Taurchini8, Andrea Amadori9, Claudio Vicini2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the hypothesis that the experience of the surgeon is sufficient to partially compensate for the lack of haptic feedback of the robotic system da Vinci Si HD (Intuitive (®) ). Twenty-five international surgeons belonging to different areas of surgical specialization were divided into two groups of investigation: experts and non-experts in the use of da Vinci Platform. This allocation was made on the basis of the following criteria: the number of performed procedures, the number of robotic working days and the number of true console hours. All participants underwent a specific test to assess their ability to recognize the thickness of custom-made membranes, without the availability of haptic feedback. After the performance of the surgeons, score was given according to an appropriate evaluation system (time, preciseness, force of tension and finding a metallic object). The analysis of the performances of participants provided the following results: an average score of 8.87 for the experts compared to 3.57 of non-experts with significant difference (P < 0.05). Other parameters of interest as the average time to conduct the test showed a result of 28.8 s for experts and 71.3 s of non-experts. After our results, a significant difference between the two groups in terms of performance was found. Our hypothesis that the expertise ability of the experts might partially overcome the lack of haptic feedback was confirmed. Probably visual feedback may play a role.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Da Vinci; Force feedback; Haptic feedback; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26559538     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-015-0541-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  12 in total

1.  Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery: results and analysis.

Authors:  Gregory Tholey; Jaydev P Desai; Andres E Castellanos
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance.

Authors:  Carol E Reiley; Takintope Akinbiyi; Darius Burschka; David C Chang; Allison M Okamura; David D Yuh
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Computer-assisted telemanipulation: an enabling technology for endoscopic coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  H Shennib; A Bastawisy; M J Mack; F H Moll
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Future perspectives in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Alexei Wedmid; Elton Llukani; David I Lee
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics.

Authors:  Jenna Lüttgen; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Experience related factors compensate for haptic loss in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Nicholas E Gattas; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi; Azad S Najmaldin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Robotic mitral valve surgery: a United States multicenter trial.

Authors:  L Wiley Nifong; W R Chitwood; P S Pappas; C R Smith; M Argenziano; V A Starnes; P M Shah
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Current status of endoscopic and robotic mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  W Randolph Chitwood
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 9.  Learning curve using robotic surgery.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kaul; Nikhil L Shah; Mani Menon
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 10.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.

Authors:  O A J van der Meijden; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Novel Technologies in Urologic Surgery: a Rapidly Changing Scenario.

Authors:  Giorgio Gandaglia; Peter Schatteman; Geert De Naeyer; Frederiek D'Hondt; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Positive Margins by Oropharyngeal Subsite in Transoral Robotic Surgery for T1/T2 Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael J Persky; William G Albergotti; Tanya J Rath; Mark W Kubik; Shira Abberbock; Mathew Geltzeiler; Seungwon Kim; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L Ferris
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  Transoral robotic surgery for the management of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Meccariello; Giovanni Cammaroto; Filippo Montevecchi; Paut T Hoff; Matthew E Spector; Hesham Negm; Medhat Shams; Chiara Bellini; Ermelinda Zeccardo; Claudio Vicini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Current status and evolution of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery in Germany-results from a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Thorben Möller; Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Martin Eichhorn; Hans-Stefan Hofmann; Ingo Krüger; Jens-C Rückert; Tim Sandhaus; Matthias Steinert
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Robotic colorectal surgery and ergonomics.

Authors:  Shing Wai Wong; Zhen Hao Ang; Phillip F Yang; Philip Crowe
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-04-22

6.  Impact of haptic feedback on applied intracorporeal forces using a novel surgical robotic system-a randomized cross-over study with novices in an experimental setup.

Authors:  Johanna Miller; Manuel Braun; Johannes Bilz; Sebastian Matich; Carsten Neupert; Wolfgang Kunert; Andreas Kirschniak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Electrically-Evoked Proximity Sensation Can Enhance Fine Finger Control in Telerobotic Pinch.

Authors:  Ziqi Zhao; Minku Yeo; Stefan Manoharan; Seok Chang Ryu; Hangue Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Advances in laparoscopic urologic surgery techniques.

Authors:  Haidar M Abdul-Muhsin; Mitchell R Humphreys
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-04-21

9.  Instrumental tactile diagnostics in robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Rozalia F Solodova; Vladimir V Galatenko; Eldar R Nakashidze; Igor L Andreytsev; Alexey V Galatenko; Dmitriy K Senchik; Vladimir M Staroverov; Vladimir E Podolskii; Mikhail E Sokolov; Victor A Sadovnichy
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-10-31

Review 10.  Mixed reality applications in urology: Requirements and future potential.

Authors:  Gerd Reis; Mehmet Yilmaz; Jason Rambach; Alain Pagani; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Arkadiusz Miernik; Paul Lesur; Nareg Minaskan
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.