Literature DB >> 22836521

Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics.

Jenna Lüttgen1, Herbert Heuer.   

Abstract

Robotic guidance is an engineered form of haptic-guidance training and intended to enhance motor learning in rehabilitation, surgery, and sports. However, its benefits (and pitfalls) are still debated. Here, we investigate the effects of different presentation modes on the reproduction of a spatiotemporal movement pattern. In three different groups of participants, the movement was demonstrated in three different modalities, namely visual, haptic, and visuo-haptic. After demonstration, participants had to reproduce the movement in two alternating recall conditions: haptic and visuo-haptic. Performance of the three groups during recall was compared with regard to spatial and dynamic movement characteristics. After haptic presentation, participants showed superior dynamic accuracy, whereas after visual presentation, participants performed better with regard to spatial accuracy. Added visual feedback during recall always led to enhanced performance, independent of the movement characteristic and the presentation modality. These findings substantiate the different benefits of different presentation modes for different movement characteristics. In particular, robotic guidance is beneficial for the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22836521     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3190-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  13 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive motor control: spatial and temporal aspects.

Authors:  Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Haptic guidance can enhance motor learning of a steering task.

Authors:  Laura Marchal Crespo; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Effects of an auditory model on the learning of relative and absolute timing.

Authors:  C H Shea; G Wulf; J H Park; B Gaunt
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Unwanted asymmetrical transfer effects with balanced experimental designs.

Authors:  E C Poulton; P R Freeman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The influence of haptic guidance on the production of spatio-temporal patterns.

Authors:  Jenna Lüttgen; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Comparison of error-amplification and haptic-guidance training techniques for learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy individuals.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Milot; Laura Marchal-Crespo; Christopher S Green; Steven C Cramer; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A robotic wheelchair trainer: design overview and a feasibility study.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; Jan Furumasu; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Learning to perform a new movement with robotic assistance: comparison of haptic guidance and visual demonstration.

Authors:  J Liu; S C Cramer; D J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 9.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury.

Authors:  Laura Marchal-Crespo; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Haptic guidance improves the visuo-manual tracking of trajectories.

Authors:  Jérémy Bluteau; Sabine Coquillart; Yohan Payan; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  An experimental study about haptic feedback in robotic surgery: may visual feedback substitute tactile feedback?

Authors:  Giuseppe Meccariello; Federico Faedi; Saleh AlGhamdi; Filippo Montevecchi; Elisabetta Firinu; Claudia Zanotti; Davide Cavaliere; Roberta Gunelli; Marco Taurchini; Andrea Amadori; Claudio Vicini
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-11-11

2.  Haptic guidance interferes with learning to make movements at an angle to stimulus direction.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Katrin Rapp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sonification and haptic feedback in addition to visual feedback enhances complex motor task learning.

Authors:  Roland Sigrist; Georg Rauter; Laura Marchal-Crespo; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Motor learning with fading and growing haptic guidance.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Jenna Lüttgen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Time flies when you are in a groove: using entrainment to mechanical resonance to teach a desired movement distorts the perception of the movement's timing.

Authors:  Daniel K Zondervan; Jaime E Duarte; Justin B Rowe; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.