Literature DB >> 33886064

Robotic colorectal surgery and ergonomics.

Shing Wai Wong1,2, Zhen Hao Ang3, Phillip F Yang3, Philip Crowe3,4.   

Abstract

Improved ergonomics for the operating surgeon may be an advantage of robotic colorectal surgery. Perceived robotic ergonomic advantages in visualisation include better exposure, three-dimensional vision, surgeon camera control, and line of sight screen location. Postural advantages include seated position and freedom from the constraints of the sterile operating field. Manipulation benefits include articulated instruments with seven degrees of freedom movement, elimination of fulcrum effect, tremor filtration, and scaling of movement. Potential ergonomic detriments of robotic surgery include lack of haptic feedback, visual, and mental strain from increased operating time and interruptions to workflow from crowding.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal surgery; Ergonomics; Manipulation; Posture; Robotic; Visualization

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33886064     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01240-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  51 in total

1.  Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance.

Authors:  V Falk; D Mintz; J Grünenfelder; J I Fann; T A Burdon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robotics and ergonomics.

Authors:  Nicholas Stylopoulos; David Rattner
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  A Comparative Study of Distinct Ocular Symptoms After Performing Laparoscopic Surgical Tasks Using a Three-Dimensional Surgical Imaging System and a Conventional Two-Dimensional Surgical Imaging System.

Authors:  Jun Zhou; Han-jiang Xu; Chao-zhao Liang; Li Zhang; Zong-yao Hao; Li-xia Feng
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G B Hanna; S M Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display.

Authors:  G B Hanna; S M Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  3D presentation in surgery: a review of technology and adverse effects.

Authors:  Tianqi Wang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-12-15

7.  Visual-perceptual mismatch in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Ahmad Abiri; Anna Tao; Meg LaRocca; Xingmin Guan; Syed J Askari; James W Bisley; Erik P Dutson; Warren S Grundfest
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Surgeons' physical discomfort and symptoms during robotic surgery: a comprehensive ergonomic survey study.

Authors:  G I Lee; M R Lee; I Green; M Allaf; M R Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons and Interventionalists: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sherise Epstein; Emily H Sparer; Bao N Tran; Qing Z Ruan; Jack T Dennerlein; Dhruv Singhal; Bernard T Lee
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control .

Authors:  L R Kavoussi; R G Moore; J B Adams; A W Partin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.