Literature DB >> 24397464

Experience related factors compensate for haptic loss in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Thomas P Cundy1, Nicholas E Gattas, Guang-Zhong Yang, Ara Darzi, Azad S Najmaldin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Surgeons anecdotally report awareness of nontactile sensory cues that compensate for absent haptic feedback in robot-assisted surgery. This study investigates this poorly understood adaptive process by evaluating frequency of in vivo suture damage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive cases of children undergoing robot-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty were examined. Suture damage was defined as incomplete (i.e., fraying) or complete (i.e., broken) loss of thread integrity and prospectively recorded with clinical data. Suture technique, size, and robotic instruments used for suturing were subjected to post hoc analysis. Statistical analysis was undertaken using appropriate nonparametric tests.
RESULTS: Overall frequency of suture damage was 2.6% among 1135 sutures used in 52 patients. The mean number of sutures used for cases in this series was 22 (standard deviation±6). There was a significant inverse trend between surgeon experience and suture damage frequency (P=0.014), implying that greater surgeon experience was associated with less suture damage. The impact of experience on suture damage was most apparent when comparing the earliest quartile subgroup (Q1) with the later three quartile subgroups (Q2-Q4) (P<0.001). Plateau of suture damage frequency was seen after approximately 28 cases. Continuous sutures had significantly higher damage frequency compared with interrupted sutures (P=0.022). Significantly higher frequency of suture damage was seen with cases in which forceps instruments were used for suturing compared with paired needle drivers (1.4% vs 7.1%, P<0.001). All events of inadvertent tissue injury involved damage to exposed edges of the renal pelvis (n=5).
CONCLUSIONS: Suture damage is likely to be encountered during the learning curve of robot-assisted surgery but decreases with surgeon experience. Preferential use of larger suture size, interrupted sutures, and paired needle driver instruments may help to minimize suture damage. Experience-related perceptual skills that compensate for haptic loss are likely to be acquirable in a preclinical simulation environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24397464     DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

1.  An experimental study about haptic feedback in robotic surgery: may visual feedback substitute tactile feedback?

Authors:  Giuseppe Meccariello; Federico Faedi; Saleh AlGhamdi; Filippo Montevecchi; Elisabetta Firinu; Claudia Zanotti; Davide Cavaliere; Roberta Gunelli; Marco Taurchini; Andrea Amadori; Claudio Vicini
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-11-11

2.  Tensile strength and failure load of sutures for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Ahmad Abiri; Omeed Paydar; Anna Tao; Megan LaRocca; Kang Liu; Bradley Genovese; Robert Candler; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Farshid Amirabdollahian; Salvatore Livatino; Behrad Vahedi; Radhika Gudipati; Patrick Sheen; Shan Gawrie-Mohan; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

4.  INFLUENCE OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE LAPAROSCOPIC EXPERIENCE SKILLS ON ROBOTIC SURGERY DEXTERITY.

Authors:  Marcos Belotto; Larissa Coutinho; Adhemar M Pacheco-Jr; Anuar I Mitre; Eduardo Antunes da Fonseca
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-01-05

5.  Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning.

Authors:  F J Voskens; E M van der Schans; J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.