Maurice C van Staveren1, Andre B P van Kuilenburg2, Henk-Jan Guchelaar3, Judith Meijer2, Cornelis J A Punt4, Robert S de Jong5, Hans Gelderblom6, Jan Gerard Maring7. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Treant Healthgroup, Scheper Hospital, Emmen, The Netherlands. 2. Laboratory of Genetic Metabolic Diseases, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Oncology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, University Hospital of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Pharmacy, Isala Diaconessen Hospital, Meppel and Bethesda Hospital,Hoogeveen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
AIM: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency can lead to severe toxicity following 5-fluorouracil (5FU) or capecitabine (CAP) treatment. Uracil (U) can be used as a probe to determine systemic DPD activity. The present study was performed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a U loading dose for detecting DPD deficiency. METHODS: Cancer patients with Common Toxicity Score (CTC) grade III or IV toxicity after the first or second cycle of 5-FU or CAP treatment were asked to participate. Based on DPD activity in PBMCs, patients were divided into two groups: DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) <5 nmol mg(-1) *h(-1) (deficient group) and ≥ 5 nmol mg(-1) *h(-1) . U 500 mg m(-2) was administered orally and plasma concentrations of U and dihydrouracil (DHU) were determined. In the deficient group, polymerase chain reaction amplification of all 23 coding exons and flanking intronic regions of DPYD was performed. A U pharmacokinetic model was developed and used to determine the maximum enzymatic conversion capacity (Vmax ) of the DPD enzyme for each patient. The sensitivity and specificity of Vmax, U concentration and the U/DHU concentration ratio were determined. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were included (19 DPD deficient, 28 DPD normal). Of the pharmacokinetic parameters investigated, a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 98%, respectively, was obtained for the U/DHU ratio at t = 120 min. CONCLUSIONS: The high sensitivity of the U/DHU ratio at t = 120 min for detecting DPD deficiency, as defined by DPD activity in PBMCs, showed that the oral U loading dose can effectively identify patients with reduced DPD activity.
AIM: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency can lead to severe toxicity following 5-fluorouracil (5FU) or capecitabine (CAP) treatment. Uracil (U) can be used as a probe to determine systemic DPD activity. The present study was performed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a U loading dose for detecting DPD deficiency. METHODS:Cancerpatients with Common Toxicity Score (CTC) grade III or IV toxicity after the first or second cycle of 5-FU or CAP treatment were asked to participate. Based on DPD activity in PBMCs, patients were divided into two groups: DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) <5 nmol mg(-1) *h(-1) (deficient group) and ≥ 5 nmol mg(-1) *h(-1) . U 500 mg m(-2) was administered orally and plasma concentrations of U and dihydrouracil (DHU) were determined. In the deficient group, polymerase chain reaction amplification of all 23 coding exons and flanking intronic regions of DPYD was performed. A U pharmacokinetic model was developed and used to determine the maximum enzymatic conversion capacity (Vmax ) of the DPD enzyme for each patient. The sensitivity and specificity of Vmax, U concentration and the U/DHU concentration ratio were determined. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were included (19 DPD deficient, 28 DPD normal). Of the pharmacokinetic parameters investigated, a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 98%, respectively, was obtained for the U/DHU ratio at t = 120 min. CONCLUSIONS: The high sensitivity of the U/DHU ratio at t = 120 min for detecting DPD deficiency, as defined by DPD activity in PBMCs, showed that the oral U loading dose can effectively identify patients with reduced DPD activity.
Authors: H van Lenthe; A B van Kuilenburg; T Ito; A H Bootsma; A van Cruchten; Y Wada; A H van Gennip Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: J J Swen; M Nijenhuis; A de Boer; L Grandia; A H Maitland-van der Zee; H Mulder; G A P J M Rongen; R H N van Schaik; T Schalekamp; D J Touw; J van der Weide; B Wilffert; V H M Deneer; H-J Guchelaar Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-03-16 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: A B Van Kuilenburg; P Vreken; N G Abeling; H D Bakker; R Meinsma; H Van Lenthe; R A De Abreu; J A Smeitink; H Kayserili; M Y Apak; E Christensen; I Holopainen; K Pulkki; D Riva; G Botteon; E Holme; M Tulinius; W J Kleijer; F A Beemer; M Duran; K E Niezen-Koning; G P Smit; C Jakobs; L M Smit; A H Van Gennip Journal: Hum Genet Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: M C Etienne; J L Lagrange; O Dassonville; R Fleming; A Thyss; N Renée; M Schneider; F Demard; G Milano Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1994-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Salvatore Terrazzino; Sarah Cargnin; Marzia Del Re; Romano Danesi; Pier Luigi Canonico; Armando A Genazzani Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.533
Authors: Maurice C van Staveren; Andre B P van Kuilenburg; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Judith Meijer; Cornelis J A Punt; Robert S de Jong; Hans Gelderblom; Jan Gerard Maring Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Jan H Beumer; Edward Chu; Carmen Allegra; Yusuke Tanigawara; Gerard Milano; Robert Diasio; Tae Won Kim; Ron H Mathijssen; Li Zhang; Dirk Arnold; Katsuki Muneoka; Narikazu Boku; Markus Joerger Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Ursula Amstutz; Linda M Henricks; Steven M Offer; Julia Barbarino; Jan H M Schellens; Jesse J Swen; Teri E Klein; Howard L McLeod; Kelly E Caudle; Robert B Diasio; Matthias Schwab Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Nuala A Helsby; John Duley; Kathryn E Burns; Claire Bonnet; Soo Hee Jeong; Elliott Brenman; Paula Barlow; Katrina Sharples; David Porter; Michael Findlay Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Maurice C van Staveren; Andre B P van Kuilenburg; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Judith Meijer; Cornelis J A Punt; Robert S de Jong; Hans Gelderblom; Jan Gerard Maring Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: A Ruzzo; F Graziano; Fabio Galli; Francesca Galli; E Rulli; S Lonardi; M Ronzoni; B Massidda; V Zagonel; N Pella; C Mucciarini; R Labianca; M T Ionta; I Bagaloni; E Veltri; P Sozzi; S Barni; V Ricci; L Foltran; M Nicolini; E Biondi; A Bramati; D Turci; S Lazzarelli; C Verusio; F Bergamo; A Sobrero; L Frontini; M Menghi; M Magnani Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Jonathan E Knikman; Hans Gelderblom; Jos H Beijnen; Annemieke Cats; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Linda M Henricks Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 6.875