BACKGROUND: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) catalyzes the degradation of thymine, uracil, and the chemotherapeutic drug 5-fluorouracil. To identify patients suffering from complete or partial DPD deficiency and to identify pitfalls that can preclude the proper diagnosis of patients with partial DPD deficiency, a sensitive and accurate assay is necessary. METHODS: The activity of DPD was measured using [4-(14)C]thymine followed by separation of substrate and products with reversed-phase HPLC with on-line detection of the radioactivity. RESULTS: Complete baseline separation of radiolabeled thymine and all degradation products was achieved within 15 min. The detection limit for dihydrothymine was 0. 4 pmol. In lymphocytes, the DPD activity deviated from linearity at low protein concentrations (<0.2 g/L). Profoundly decreased activity of DPD was detected in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBM cells) of two tumor patients when measured at low protein concentrations. Low DPD activity comparable to that observed in obligate heterozygotes was initially detected in PBM cells, containing substantial amounts of myeloid cells, from a patient suffering from 5-fluorouracil toxicity. However, after the patient experienced full clinical recovery, normal DPD activity was observed in the PBM cells. No significant differences in DPD activity were observed between exponentially growing fibroblasts and those at confluence. The range of DPD activities of obligate heterozygotes overlaps the range of DPD activities of controls. CONCLUSIONS: The low activity of DPD measured in PBM cells containing myeloid cells or that measured at a low protein concentration in the assay mixture is not indicative of heterozygosity for a mutant DPD allele. Although fibroblasts are suitable to establish a complete deficiency of DPD, unambiguous detection of heterozygotes is not possible.
BACKGROUND:Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) catalyzes the degradation of thymine, uracil, and the chemotherapeutic drug 5-fluorouracil. To identify patients suffering from complete or partial DPD deficiency and to identify pitfalls that can preclude the proper diagnosis of patients with partial DPD deficiency, a sensitive and accurate assay is necessary. METHODS: The activity of DPD was measured using [4-(14)C]thymine followed by separation of substrate and products with reversed-phase HPLC with on-line detection of the radioactivity. RESULTS: Complete baseline separation of radiolabeled thymine and all degradation products was achieved within 15 min. The detection limit for dihydrothymine was 0. 4 pmol. In lymphocytes, the DPD activity deviated from linearity at low protein concentrations (<0.2 g/L). Profoundly decreased activity of DPD was detected in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBM cells) of two tumorpatients when measured at low protein concentrations. Low DPD activity comparable to that observed in obligate heterozygotes was initially detected in PBM cells, containing substantial amounts of myeloid cells, from a patient suffering from 5-fluorouraciltoxicity. However, after the patient experienced full clinical recovery, normal DPD activity was observed in the PBM cells. No significant differences in DPD activity were observed between exponentially growing fibroblasts and those at confluence. The range of DPD activities of obligate heterozygotes overlaps the range of DPD activities of controls. CONCLUSIONS: The low activity of DPD measured in PBM cells containing myeloid cells or that measured at a low protein concentration in the assay mixture is not indicative of heterozygosity for a mutant DPD allele. Although fibroblasts are suitable to establish a complete deficiency of DPD, unambiguous detection of heterozygotes is not possible.
Authors: A B Van Kuilenburg; H Van Lenthe; B Assmann; G Göhlich-Ratmann; G F Hoffmann; C Bräutigam; R A Wevers; A H Van Gennip Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 4.982
Authors: Bart A W Jacobs; Nikol Snoeren; Morsal Samim; Hilde Rosing; Niels de Vries; Maarten J Deenen; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens; Miriam Koopman; Richard van Hillegersberg Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-02-11 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: André B P van Kuilenburg; Doreen Dobritzsch; Rutger Meinsma; Janet Haasjes; Hans R Waterham; Malgorzata J M Nowaczyk; George D Maropoulos; Guido Hein; Hermann Kalhoff; Jean M Kirk; Holger Baaske; Anne Aukett; John A Duley; Kate P Ward; Ylva Lindqvist; Albert H van Gennip Journal: Biochem J Date: 2002-05-15 Impact factor: 3.857
Authors: André B P van Kuilenburg; Judith Meijer; Adri N P M Mul; Raoul C M Hennekam; Jan M N Hoovers; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Peter Weber; Andrea Capone Mori; Jörgen Bierau; Brian Fowler; Klaus Macke; Jörn Oliver Sass; Rutger Meinsma; Julia B Hennermann; Peter Miny; Lida Zoetekouw; Raymon Vijzelaar; Joost Nicolai; Bauke Ylstra; M Estela Rubio-Gozalbo Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2009-03-19 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Maurice C van Staveren; Andre B P van Kuilenburg; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Judith Meijer; Cornelis J A Punt; Robert S de Jong; Hans Gelderblom; Jan Gerard Maring Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Maurice C van Staveren; Barbara Theeuwes-Oonk; Henk Jan Guchelaar; André B P van Kuilenburg; Jan Gerard Maring Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: J G Maring; A B P van Kuilenburg; J Haasjes; H Piersma; H J M Groen; D R A Uges; A H Van Gennip; E G E De Vries Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2002-04-08 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Lukrecija Brečević; Martina Rinčić; Željka Krsnik; Goran Sedmak; Ahmed B Hamid; Nadezda Kosyakova; Ivan Galić; Thomas Liehr; Fran Borovečki Journal: Transl Neurosci Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 1.757