Nuala A Helsby1, John Duley2, Kathryn E Burns1, Claire Bonnet1, Soo Hee Jeong1, Elliott Brenman3, Paula Barlow3, Katrina Sharples4,5, David Porter3, Michael Findlay3,5. 1. Molecular Medicine and Pathology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand. 2. School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Australia. 3. Blood and Cancer, Auckland City Hospital, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand. 4. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Otago, New Zealand. 5. Cancer Trials New Zealand, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
AIMS: A previous study suggested that a thymine (THY) challenge dose could detect aberrant pharmacokinetics in known cases of fluoropyrimidine toxicity compared with healthy volunteers. The preliminary data suggested that urine sampling also could detect this aberrant disposition. The aim of this case-control study was to assess the ability of the urinary THY challenge test to discriminate cases of severe gastrointestinal toxicity in a cohort of patients treated with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine. METHODS: Patients (n = 37) received a 250 mg (per os) dose of THY and a cumulative urine sample was collected for 0-4 h. The urinary amounts of THY and metabolite dihydrothymine (DHT) were determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Genomic DNA was analysed for DPYD gene variants. Renal function was estimated from blood creatinine levels. Cases (n = 9) and noncases (n = 23) of severe (grade ≥ 3) gastrointestinal toxicity were defined based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: The median THY/DHT ratios were 6.2 (interquartile range 2.9-6.4) in cases, including the 2 patients who were DPYD heterozygous carriers. However, this was not significantly different (P = .07) from the THY/DHT in noncases (median 2.6, interquartile range 2.8-4.2). Although creatinine clearance was lower (P = .001) in cases, renal function could not discriminate cases from noncases. However, logistic regression analysis using both of these explanatory variables could discriminate most cases (receiver operating characteristic area 0.8792, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The THY challenge test combined with a patient's renal function may be useful as a phenotypic diagnostic test to detect risk of life-threatening fluoropyrimidine gastrointestinal toxicity.
AIMS: A previous study suggested that a thymine (THY) challenge dose could detect aberrant pharmacokinetics in known cases of fluoropyrimidinetoxicity compared with healthy volunteers. The preliminary data suggested that urine sampling also could detect this aberrant disposition. The aim of this case-control study was to assess the ability of the urinary THY challenge test to discriminate cases of severe gastrointestinal toxicity in a cohort of patients treated with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine. METHODS:Patients (n = 37) received a 250 mg (per os) dose of THY and a cumulative urine sample was collected for 0-4 h. The urinary amounts of THY and metabolite dihydrothymine (DHT) were determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Genomic DNA was analysed for DPYD gene variants. Renal function was estimated from blood creatinine levels. Cases (n = 9) and noncases (n = 23) of severe (grade ≥ 3) gastrointestinal toxicity were defined based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: The median THY/DHT ratios were 6.2 (interquartile range 2.9-6.4) in cases, including the 2 patients who were DPYD heterozygous carriers. However, this was not significantly different (P = .07) from the THY/DHT in noncases (median 2.6, interquartile range 2.8-4.2). Although creatinine clearance was lower (P = .001) in cases, renal function could not discriminate cases from noncases. However, logistic regression analysis using both of these explanatory variables could discriminate most cases (receiver operating characteristic area 0.8792, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The THY challenge test combined with a patient's renal function may be useful as a phenotypic diagnostic test to detect risk of life-threatening fluoropyrimidinegastrointestinal toxicity.
Authors: Marta Pellicer; Xandra García-González; María I García; Luis Robles; Cristina Grávalos; Pilar García-Alfonso; Vanessa Pachón; Federico Longo; Virginia Martínez; Carolina Blanco; Irene Iglesias; María Sanjurjo; Luis A López-Fernández Journal: Pharmacol Res Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 7.658
Authors: Kathryn E Burns; Daniel Allright; David Porter; Michael P Findlay; Nuala A Helsby Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: M C van Staveren; H Jan Guchelaar; A B P van Kuilenburg; H Gelderblom; J G Maring Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 3.550
Authors: Christopher Poole; Jill Gardiner; Chris Twelves; Patrick Johnston; Peter Harper; Jim Cassidy; Jayne Monkhouse; Ludger Banken; Erhard Weidekamm; Bruno Reigner Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2002-01-10 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: K E Caudle; C F Thorn; T E Klein; J J Swen; H L McLeod; R B Diasio; M Schwab Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Linda M Henricks; Carin A T C Lunenburg; Femke M de Man; Didier Meulendijks; Geert W J Frederix; Emma Kienhuis; Geert-Jan Creemers; Arnold Baars; Vincent O Dezentjé; Alexander L T Imholz; Frank J F Jeurissen; Johanna E A Portielje; Rob L H Jansen; Paul Hamberg; Albert J Ten Tije; Helga J Droogendijk; Miriam Koopman; Peter Nieboer; Marlène H W van de Poel; Caroline M P W Mandigers; Hilde Rosing; Jos H Beijnen; Erik van Werkhoven; André B P van Kuilenburg; Ron H N van Schaik; Ron H J Mathijssen; Jesse J Swen; Hans Gelderblom; Annemieke Cats; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Maurice C van Staveren; Frans Opdam; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; André B P van Kuilenburg; Jan Gerard Maring; Hans Gelderblom Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2015-05-10 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Nuala A Helsby; John Duley; Kathryn E Burns; Claire Bonnet; Soo Hee Jeong; Elliott Brenman; Paula Barlow; Katrina Sharples; David Porter; Michael Findlay Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Kathryn E Burns; Ottiniel Chavani; Soo Hee Jeong; John A Duley; David Porter; Michael Findlay; R Matthew Strother; Nuala A Helsby Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 3.333