Literature DB >> 34274690

Deep-LIBRA: An artificial-intelligence method for robust quantification of breast density with independent validation in breast cancer risk assessment.

Omid Haji Maghsoudi1, Aimilia Gastounioti2, Christopher Scott3, Lauren Pantalone2, Fang-Fang Wu3, Eric A Cohen2, Stacey Winham3, Emily F Conant2, Celine Vachon3, Despina Kontos4.   

Abstract

Breast density is an important risk factor for breast cancer that also affects the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. Current federal legislation mandates reporting of breast density for all women undergoing breast cancer screening. Clinically, breast density is assessed visually using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) scale. Here, we introduce an artificial intelligence (AI) method to estimate breast density from digital mammograms. Our method leverages deep learning using two convolutional neural network architectures to accurately segment the breast area. An AI algorithm combining superpixel generation and radiomic machine learning is then applied to differentiate dense from non-dense tissue regions within the breast, from which breast density is estimated. Our method was trained and validated on a multi-racial, multi-institutional dataset of 15,661 images (4,437 women), and then tested on an independent matched case-control dataset of 6368 digital mammograms (414 cases; 1178 controls) for both breast density estimation and case-control discrimination. On the independent dataset, breast percent density (PD) estimates from Deep-LIBRA and an expert reader were strongly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.90). Moreover, in a model adjusted for age and BMI, Deep-LIBRA yielded a higher case-control discrimination performance (area under the ROC curve, AUC = 0.612 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.584, 0.640]) compared to four other widely-used research and commercial breast density assessment methods (AUCs = 0.528 to 0.599). Our results suggest a strong agreement of breast density estimates between Deep-LIBRA and gold-standard assessment by an expert reader, as well as improved performance in breast cancer risk assessment over state-of-the-art open-source and commercial methods.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Breast cancer risk; Breast density; Deep learning; Digital mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34274690      PMCID: PMC8453099          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   13.828


  40 in total

1.  Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Adam Yala; Tal Schuster; Brian Dontchos; Manisha Bahl; Kyle Swanson; Regina Barzilay
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Mammographic breast density decreases after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Austin D Williams; Alycia So; Marie Synnestvedt; Colleen M Tewksbury; Despina Kontos; Meng-Kang Hsiehm; Lauren Pantalone; Emily F Conant; Mitchell Schnall; Kristoffel Dumon; Noel Williams; Julia Tchou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions.

Authors:  Thijs Kooi; Geert Litjens; Bram van Ginneken; Albert Gubern-Mérida; Clara I Sánchez; Ritse Mann; Ard den Heeten; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.

Authors:  Kathleen R Brandt; Christopher G Scott; Lin Ma; Amir P Mahmoudzadeh; Matthew R Jensen; Dana H Whaley; Fang Fang Wu; Serghei Malkov; Carrie B Hruska; Aaron D Norman; John Heine; John Shepherd; V Shane Pankratz; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.

Authors:  M T Mandelson; N Oestreicher; P L Porter; D White; C A Finder; S H Taplin; E White
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Detection of Breast Cancer with Mammography: Effect of an Artificial Intelligence Support System.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Elizabeth Krupinski; Jan-Jurre Mordang; Kathy Schilling; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Ritse M Mann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; J E L Desautels; R A Borges; A F Frère
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data.

Authors:  Curtis T Rueden; Johannes Schindelin; Mark C Hiner; Barry E DeZonia; Alison E Walter; Ellen T Arena; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Long-term Accuracy of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Combining Classic Risk Factors and Breast Density.

Authors:  Adam R Brentnall; Jack Cuzick; Diana S M Buist; Erin J Aiello Bowles
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Population-Attributable Risk Proportion of Clinical Risk Factors for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Natalie J Engmann; Marzieh K Golmakani; Diana L Miglioretti; Brian L Sprague; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more
  4 in total

1.  Dual-Intended Deep Learning Model for Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Nicolle Vigil; Madeline Barry; Arya Amini; Moulay Akhloufi; Xavier P V Maldague; Lan Ma; Lei Ren; Bardia Yousefi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Research on the Characteristics of Food Impaction with Tight Proximal Contacts Based on Deep Learning.

Authors:  Yitong Cheng; Zhijiang Wang; Yue Shi; Qiaoling Guo; Qian Li; Rui Chai; Feng Wu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence in mammographic phenotyping of breast cancer risk: a narrative review.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Shyam Desai; Vinayak S Ahluwalia; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 8.408

4.  Breast Dense Tissue Segmentation with Noisy Labels: A Hybrid Threshold-Based and Mask-Based Approach.

Authors:  Andrés Larroza; Francisco Javier Pérez-Benito; Juan-Carlos Perez-Cortes; Marta Román; Marina Pollán; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Dolores Salas-Trejo; María Casals; Rafael Llobet
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.