Joseph V Rispoli1,2,3, Steven M Wright1,4, Craig R Malloy5,6, Mary P McDougall1,4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America. 2. Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America. 3. School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America. 4. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America. 5. Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America. 6. Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human voxel models incorporating detailed anatomical features are vital tools for the computational evaluation of electromagnetic (EM) fields within the body. Besides whole-body human voxel models, phantoms representing smaller heterogeneous anatomical features are often employed; for example, localized breast voxel models incorporating fatty and fibroglandular tissues have been developed for a variety of EM applications including mammography simulation and dosimetry, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultra-wideband microwave imaging. However, considering wavelength effects, electromagnetic modeling of the breast at sub-microwave frequencies necessitates detailed breast phantoms in conjunction with whole-body voxel models. METHODS: Heterogeneous breast phantoms are sized to fit within radiofrequency coil hardware, modified by voxel-wise extrusion, and fused to whole-body models using voxel-wise, tissue-dependent logical operators. To illustrate the utility of this method, finite-difference time-domain simulations are performed using a whole-body model integrated with a variety of available breast phantoms spanning the standard four tissue density classifications representing the majority of the population. RESULTS: The software library uses a combination of voxel operations to seamlessly size, modify, and fuse eleven breast phantoms to whole-body voxel models. The software is publicly available on GitHub and is linked to the file exchange at MATLAB® Central. Simulations confirm the proportions of fatty and fibroglandular tissues in breast phantoms have significant yet predictable implications on projected power deposition in tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Breast phantoms may be modified and fused to whole-body voxel models using the software presented in this work; user considerations for the open-source software and resultant phantoms are discussed. Furthermore, results indicate simulating breast models as predominantly fatty tissue can considerably underestimate the potential for tissue heating in women with substantial fibroglandular tissue.
BACKGROUND:Human voxel models incorporating detailed anatomical features are vital tools for the computational evaluation of electromagnetic (EM) fields within the body. Besides whole-body human voxel models, phantoms representing smaller heterogeneous anatomical features are often employed; for example, localized breast voxel models incorporating fatty and fibroglandular tissues have been developed for a variety of EM applications including mammography simulation and dosimetry, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultra-wideband microwave imaging. However, considering wavelength effects, electromagnetic modeling of the breast at sub-microwave frequencies necessitates detailed breast phantoms in conjunction with whole-body voxel models. METHODS: Heterogeneous breast phantoms are sized to fit within radiofrequency coil hardware, modified by voxel-wise extrusion, and fused to whole-body models using voxel-wise, tissue-dependent logical operators. To illustrate the utility of this method, finite-difference time-domain simulations are performed using a whole-body model integrated with a variety of available breast phantoms spanning the standard four tissue density classifications representing the majority of the population. RESULTS: The software library uses a combination of voxel operations to seamlessly size, modify, and fuse eleven breast phantoms to whole-body voxel models. The software is publicly available on GitHub and is linked to the file exchange at MATLAB® Central. Simulations confirm the proportions of fatty and fibroglandular tissues in breast phantoms have significant yet predictable implications on projected power deposition in tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Breast phantoms may be modified and fused to whole-body voxel models using the software presented in this work; user considerations for the open-source software and resultant phantoms are discussed. Furthermore, results indicate simulating breast models as predominantly fatty tissue can considerably underestimate the potential for tissue heating in women with substantial fibroglandular tissue.
Authors: Qing X Yang; Jinghua Wang; Xiaoliang Zhang; Christopher M Collins; Michael B Smith; Haiying Liu; Xiao-Hong Zhu; J Thomas Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Wei Chen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mariya Lazebnik; Dijana Popovic; Leah McCartney; Cynthia B Watkins; Mary J Lindstrom; Josephine Harter; Sarah Sewall; Travis Ogilvie; Anthony Magliocco; Tara M Breslin; Walley Temple; Daphne Mew; John H Booske; Michal Okoniewski; Susan C Hagness Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Mary Preston McDougall; Sergey Cheshkov; Joseph Rispoli; Craig Malloy; Ivan Dimitrov; Steven M Wright Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Tijl A van der Velden; Michel Italiaander; Wybe J M van der Kemp; Alexander J E Raaijmakers; A M Th Schmitz; Peter R Luijten; Vincent O Boer; Dennis W J Klomp Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Baiyu Chen; Jamie Shorey; Robert S Saunders; Samuel Richard; John Thompson; Loren W Nolte; Ehsan Samei Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Earl Zastrow; Shakti K Davis; Mariya Lazebnik; Frederick Kelcz; Barry D Van Veen; Susan C Hagness Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Erwin Krikken; Bart R Steensma; Ingmar J Voogt; Peter R Luijten; Dennis W J Klomp; Alexander J E Raaijmakers; Jannie P Wijnen Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 4.044