Literature DB >> 14964567

Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

R J Ferrari1, R M Rangayyan, J E L Desautels, R A Borges, A F Frère.   

Abstract

The pectoral muscle represents a predominant density region in most medio-lateral oblique (MLO) views of mammograms; its inclusion can affect the results of intensity-based image processing methods or bias procedures in the detection of breast cancer. Local analysis of the pectoral muscle may be used to identify the presence of abnormal axillary lymph nodes, which may be the only manifestation of occult breast carcinoma. We propose a new method for the identification of the pectoral muscle in MLO mammograms based upon a multiresolution technique using Gabor wavelets. This new method overcomes the limitation of the straight-line representation considered in our initial investigation using the Hough transform. The method starts by convolving a group of Gabor filters, specially designed for enhancing the pectoral muscle edge, with the region of interest containing the pectoral muscle. After computing the magnitude and phase images using a vector-summation procedure, the magnitude value of each pixel is propagated in the direction of the phase. The resulting image is then used to detect the relevant edges. Finally, a post-processing stage is used to find the true pectoral muscle edge. The method was applied to 84 MLO mammograms from the Mini-MIAS (Mammographic Image Analysis Society, London, U.K.) database. Evaluation of the pectoral muscle edge detected in the mammograms was performed based upon the percentage of false-positive (FP) and false-negative (FN) pixels determined by comparison between the numbers of pixels enclosed in the regions delimited by the edges identified by a radiologist and by the proposed method. The average FP and FN rates were, respectively, 0.58% and 5.77%. Furthermore, the results of the Gabor-filter-based method indicated low Hausdorff distances with respect to the hand-drawn pectoral muscle edges, with the mean and standard deviation being 3.84 +/- 1.73 mm over 84 images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14964567     DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2003.823062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  26 in total

1.  Segmentation of the fibro-glandular disc in mammograms using Gaussian mixture modelling.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; R A Borges; A F Frère
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Automatic detection of pectoral muscle using average gradient and shape based feature.

Authors:  Jayasree Chakraborty; Sudipta Mukhopadhyay; Veenu Singla; Niranjan Khandelwal; Pinakpani Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Breast masses detection using phase portrait analysis and fuzzy inference systems.

Authors:  Arianna Mencattini; Marcello Salmeri
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Computerized image analysis: texture-field orientation method for pectoral muscle identification on MLO-view mammograms.

Authors:  Chuan Zhou; Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Chintana Paramagul; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Julie A Douglas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Review of recent advances in segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

Authors:  Mario Mustra; Mislav Grgic; Rangaraj M Rangayyan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Robust Automatic Pectoral Muscle Segmentation from Mammograms Using Texture Gradient and Euclidean Distance Regression.

Authors:  Vibha Bafna Bora; Ashwin G Kothari; Avinash G Keskar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Mass Detection in Mammographic Images Using Wavelet Processing and Adaptive Threshold Technique.

Authors:  P S Vikhe; V R Thool
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Radon-domain detection of the nipple and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

Authors:  S K Kinoshita; P M Azevedo-Marques; R R Pereira; J A H Rodrigues; R M Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Computer-aided identification of the pectoral muscle in digitized mammograms.

Authors:  K Santle Camilus; V K Govindan; P S Sathidevi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Segmenting pectoralis muscle on digital mammograms by a Markov random field-maximum a posteriori model.

Authors:  Mei Ge; James G Mainprize; Gordon E Mawdsley; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.