| Literature DB >> 26541230 |
Simo S A Miettinen1, Tatu J Mäkinen2, Inari Kostensalo3, Keijo Mäkelä3, Heini Huhtala4, Jukka S Kettunen1, Ville Remes2,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26541230 PMCID: PMC4812071 DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1112712
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Orthop ISSN: 1745-3674 Impact factor: 3.717
Patient demographics and surgical data
| Calcar fracture group n (%) | Control group n (%) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Male | 50 (42) | 64 (54) | |
| Female | 68 (58) | 54 (46) | 0.07 |
| Mean age at surgery (range) | 60 (29–81) | 61 (32–79) | 0.3 |
| Diagnosis | |||
| Primary osteoarthritis | 70 (59) | 93 (79) | |
| Developmental dysplasia of the hip | 23 (20) | 11 (9) | |
| Fracture | 7 (6) | 6 (5) | |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | 8 (7) | 3 (2) | |
| Avascular necrosis | 5 (4) | 4 (3) | |
| Other | 5 (4) | 1 (1) | 0.03 |
| Surgical approach | |||
| Posterior | 35 (30) | 55 (47) | |
| Hardinge–lateral | 83 (70) | 63 (53) | 0.01 |
| Femoral implant type | |||
| Tapered | 13 (11) | 10 (8.5) | |
| Fit and fill | 96 (81) | 108 (92) | |
| Other | 9 (8) | 0 | 0.01 |
Acute or sequelae of the hip
Risk factors for calcar fracture
| Risk factor | Calcar fracture group n (%) | Control group n (%) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| None | 63 (53) | 95 (81) | |
| At least one risk factor | 55 (47) | 23 (20) | < 0.001 |
| Developmental dysplasia of the hip | 20 (17) | 2 (1) | |
| Long-term cortisone medication | 8 (7) | 8 (7) | |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | 7 (6) | 7 (6) | |
| Osteoporosis | 5 (4) | 1 (1) | |
| Hip fracture | 5 (4) | 1 (1) | |
| Alcohol abuse | 1 (1) | 4 (3) | |
| Other | 9 (8) | 0 |
Acute or sequelae of the hip
Figure 1.A. Radiological measurements of the proximal femur according to Noble: A, femoral head offset; B, femoral head diameter; C, femoral head position; D, canal width 20 mm above the mid-lesser trochanter line; E, canal width at the mid-lesser trochanter line; F, canal width 20 mm below the mid-lesser trochanter line; G, isthmus diameter; H, isthmus position below the mid-lesser trochanter line; I, neck-shaft angle. B. Radiological canal flare index (CFI) measurements of the proximal femur according to Noble: A, canal width +20 mm above the mid-lesser trochanter line; B, isthmus diameter. CFI = A / B. C. Radiological measurements of the proximal femur: canal-calcar ratio (X / Y) and cortical index ((Z − X) / Z).
Multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and sex. In the Noble classification, stovepipe-type and champagne flute-type proximal femurs were compared to normal-type proximal femurs. In the Dorr classification, Dorr type-B and Dorr type-C were compared to Dorr type-A
| Calcar fracture group n (%) | Control group n (%) | OR | 95% CI | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 50 (42) | 64 (54) | 1 | ||
| Female | 68 (58) | 54 (46) | 1.3 | (0.69–2.3) | 0.5 |
| Mean age at surgery (range) | 60(32–79) | 61 (29–81) | 0.97 | (0.94–1.0) | 0.03 |
| Surgical approach | |||||
| Posterior | 35 (30) | 55 (47) | 1 | ||
| Hardinge–lateral | 83 (70) | 63 (53) | 2.4 | (1.3–4.4) | 0.01 |
| CFI shape | |||||
| Normal | 78 (66) | 105 (82) | 1 | ||
| Stovepipe | 17 (14) | 10 (8) | 1.9 | (0.76–4.9) | 0.2 |
| Champagne flute | 21 (18) | 13 (9) | 2.8 | (1.1–6.9) | 0.03 |
| Impossible to measure | 2 (2) | 0 (0) | |||
| Dorr classification | |||||
| Type A | 55 (47) | 72 (61) | 1 | ||
| Type B | 42 (36) | 39 (33) | 1.5 | (0.76–2.6) | 0.2 |
| Type C | 13 (11) | 2 (2) | 6.5 | (1.3–33) | 0.02 |
| Impossible to measure | 8 (7) | 5 (4) | |||
OR: odds ratio.
Radiological measurements of femoral canal shape according to Noble (Noble et al. 1988)
| Radiological measurements | Calcar fracture group | Control group mean (range) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Femoral head offset, mm | 40 (0–59) | 43 (28–59) | 0.01 |
| Femoral head diameter, mm | 48 (0–67) | 50 (39–68) | 0.02 |
| Femoral head position, mm | 56 (0–83) | 61 (42–86) | 0.01 |
| Canal width +20 mm, mm | 42 (0–60) | 44 (30–57) | 0.01 |
| Canal width +0 mm, mm | 26 (0–36) | 28 (17–35) | 0.04 |
| Canal width –20 mm, mm | 20 (0–31) | 21 (14–28) | 0.2 |
| Isthmus position, mm | 118 (0–194) | 119 (79–160) | 0.8 |
| Isthmus width, mm | 11 (0–19) | 12 (6–19) | 0.05 |
| Neck-shaft angle, degrees | 129 (0–153) | 132 (120–151) | 0.08 |
The proximal femurs of 2 patients were so deformed that some measurements could not be performed in a reliable way.
Radiological classification according to Dorr et al. (1993). 118 hips in each group
| Dorr classification | Calcar fracture group n (%) | Control group n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Type A | 55 (47) | 72 (61) |
| Type B | 42 (36) | 39 (33) |
| Type C | 13 (11) | 2 (2) |
| Impossible to measure | 8 (7) | 5 (4) |
P-value 0.01
Classification of femoral canal shape according to Noble et al. (1988). 118 hips in each group
| CFI shape | Calcar fracture group n (%) | Control group n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Stovepipe | 17 (14) | 10 (9) |
| Normal | 78 (66) | 105 (82) |
| Champagne flute | 21 (18) | 13 (9) |
| Impossible to measure | 2 (2) | 0 |
p-value 0.02
Radiological measurements according to Dorr et al. (1993)
| Radiological measurements | Calcar fracture group | Control group mean (range) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intramedullary femoral canal diameter, mm | |||
| AP | 12 (0.0–20) | 12 (6–19) | 0.2 |
| AP proximal | 28 (0.0–39) | 30 (21–40) | 0.01 |
| ML | 16 (0.0–38) | 17 (0.0–25) | 0.7 |
| ML proximal | 32 (0.0–49) | 35 (0.0–46) | 0.06 |
| Cortical index | |||
| AP | 0.57 (0.0–0.73) | 0.59 (0.46–0.75) | 0.08 |
| ML | 0.45 (0.0–0.66) | 0.50 (0.0–0.69) | 0.06 |
| Canal-to-calcar ratio | 0.60 (0.0–1.29) | 0.59 (0.36–0.83) | 1.0 |
The proximal femurs of 2 patients were so deformed that some measurements could not be performed in a reliable way.
AP: anteroposterior; ML: mediolateral.