Alireza Akhondi-Asl1, Onur Afacan2, Mukund Balasubramanian2, Robert V Mulkern2, Simon K Warfield2. 1. Computational Radiology Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Alireza.Akhondi-asl@childrens.harvard.edu. 2. Computational Radiology Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: T2 relaxometry based on multiexponential fitting to a single slice multiecho sequence has been the most common MRI technique for myelin water fraction mapping, where the short T2 is associated with myelin water. However, very long acquisition times and physically unrealistic models for T2 distribution are limitations of this approach. We present a novel framework for myelin imaging which substantially increases the imaging speed and myelin water fraction estimation accuracy. METHOD: We used the 2D multislice Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill sequence to increase the volume coverage. To compensate for nonideal slice profiles, we numerically solved the Bloch equations for a range of T2 and B1 inhomogeneity scales to construct the bases for the estimation of the T2 distribution. We used a finite mixture of continuous parametric distributions to describe the complete T2 spectrum and used the constrained variable projection optimization algorithm to estimate myelin water fraction. To validate our model, synthetic, phantom, and in vivo brain experiments were conducted. RESULTS: Using the Bloch equations, we can model the slice profile and construct the forward model of the T2 curve. Our method estimated myelin water fraction with smaller error than the nonnegative least squares algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed framework can be used for reliable whole brain myelin imaging with a resolution of 2×2×4 mm3 in ≈17 min. Magn Reson Med 76:1301-1313, 2016.
PURPOSE: T2 relaxometry based on multiexponential fitting to a single slice multiecho sequence has been the most common MRI technique for myelin water fraction mapping, where the short T2 is associated with myelin water. However, very long acquisition times and physically unrealistic models for T2 distribution are limitations of this approach. We present a novel framework for myelin imaging which substantially increases the imaging speed and myelin water fraction estimation accuracy. METHOD: We used the 2D multislice Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill sequence to increase the volume coverage. To compensate for nonideal slice profiles, we numerically solved the Bloch equations for a range of T2 and B1 inhomogeneity scales to construct the bases for the estimation of the T2 distribution. We used a finite mixture of continuous parametric distributions to describe the complete T2 spectrum and used the constrained variable projection optimization algorithm to estimate myelin water fraction. To validate our model, synthetic, phantom, and in vivo brain experiments were conducted. RESULTS: Using the Bloch equations, we can model the slice profile and construct the forward model of the T2 curve. Our method estimated myelin water fraction with smaller error than the nonnegative least squares algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed framework can be used for reliable whole brain myelin imaging with a resolution of 2×2×4 mm3 in ≈17 min. Magn Reson Med 76:1301-1313, 2016.
Authors: Gaby S Pell; Regula S Briellmann; Anthony B Waites; David F Abbott; David P Lewis; Graeme D Jackson Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Olaf Dietrich; José G Raya; Scott B Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Kenneth L Davis; Daniel G Stewart; Joseph I Friedman; Monte Buchsbaum; Philip D Harvey; Patrick R Hof; Joseph Buxbaum; Vahram Haroutunian Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2003-05
Authors: Sharmila Vaz; Torbjörn Falkmer; Anne Elizabeth Passmore; Richard Parsons; Pantelis Andreou Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pelin Aksit Ciris; Mukund Balasubramanian; Ravi T Seethamraju; Junichi Tokuda; Jonathan Scalera; Tobias Penzkofer; Fiona M Fennessy; Clare M Tempany-Afdhal; Kemal Tuncali; Robert V Mulkern Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Mustapha Bouhrara; David A Reiter; Michael C Maring; Jean-Marie Bonny; Richard G Spencer Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Gerhard S Drenthen; Walter H Backes; Albert P Aldenkamp; Giel J Op 't Veld; Jacobus F A Jansen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: N Ceren Askin Incebacak; Yao Sui; Laura Gui Levy; Laura Merlini; Joana Sa de Almeida; Sebastien Courvoisier; Tess E Wallace; Antoine Klauser; Onur Afacan; Simon K Warfield; Petra Hüppi; Francois Lazeyras Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2021-09-10 Impact factor: 2.324