Antonius J van Rooij1, Tim M Schoenmakers2, Dike van de Mheen3. 1. iMinds-MICT-Ghent University, Department of Communication Sciences, Korte meer 7-9-11, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; IVO Addiction Research Institute Rotterdam, Heemraadssingel 194, 3021 DM Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Tony.vanRooij@UGent.be. 2. iMinds-MICT-Ghent University, Department of Communication Sciences, Korte meer 7-9-11, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; IVO Addiction Research Institute Rotterdam, Heemraadssingel 194, 3021 DM Rotterdam, The Netherlands; NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. iMinds-MICT-Ghent University, Department of Communication Sciences, Korte meer 7-9-11, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; IVO Addiction Research Institute Rotterdam, Heemraadssingel 194, 3021 DM Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Maastricht University, Department of Health Promotion, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
AIMS: Clinicians struggle with the identification of video gaming problems. To address this issue, a clinical assessment tool (C-VAT 2.0) was developed and tested in a clinical setting. The instrument allows exploration of the validity of the DSM-5 proposal for 'internet gaming disorder'. METHOD: Using C-VAT 2.0, the current study provides a sensitivity analysis of the proposed DSM-5 criteria in a clinical youth sample (13-23years old) in treatment for video gaming disorder (N=32). The study also explores the clinical characteristics of these patients. RESULTS: The patients were all male and reported spending extensive amounts of time on video games. At least half of the patients reported playing online games (n=15). Comorbid problems were common (n=22) and included (social) anxiety disorders, PDD NOS, ADHD/ADD, Parent-Child relationship problem, and various types of depressive mood problems. The sensitivity of the test was good: results further show that the C-VAT correctly identified 91% of the sample at the proposed cut-off score of at least 5 out of 9 of the criteria. As our study did not include healthy, extreme gamers, we could not assess the specificity of the tool: future research should make this a priority. CONCLUSION: Using the proposed DSM-5 cut-off score, the C-VAT 2.0 shows preliminary validity in a sample of gamers in treatment for gaming disorder, but the discriminating value of the instrument should be studied further. In the meantime, it is crucial that therapists try to avoid false positives by using expert judgment of functional impairment in each case.
AIMS: Clinicians struggle with the identification of video gaming problems. To address this issue, a clinical assessment tool (C-VAT 2.0) was developed and tested in a clinical setting. The instrument allows exploration of the validity of the DSM-5 proposal for 'internet gaming disorder'. METHOD: Using C-VAT 2.0, the current study provides a sensitivity analysis of the proposed DSM-5 criteria in a clinical youth sample (13-23years old) in treatment for video gaming disorder (N=32). The study also explores the clinical characteristics of these patients. RESULTS: The patients were all male and reported spending extensive amounts of time on video games. At least half of the patients reported playing online games (n=15). Comorbid problems were common (n=22) and included (social) anxiety disorders, PDD NOS, ADHD/ADD, Parent-Child relationship problem, and various types of depressive mood problems. The sensitivity of the test was good: results further show that the C-VAT correctly identified 91% of the sample at the proposed cut-off score of at least 5 out of 9 of the criteria. As our study did not include healthy, extreme gamers, we could not assess the specificity of the tool: future research should make this a priority. CONCLUSION: Using the proposed DSM-5 cut-off score, the C-VAT 2.0 shows preliminary validity in a sample of gamers in treatment for gaming disorder, but the discriminating value of the instrument should be studied further. In the meantime, it is crucial that therapists try to avoid false positives by using expert judgment of functional impairment in each case.
Authors: Michelle Colder Carras; Antonius J Van Rooij; Dike Van de Mheen; Rashelle Musci; Qian-Li Xue; Tamar Mendelson Journal: Comput Human Behav Date: 2016-12-01
Authors: Michelle Colder Carras; Anne Marie Porter; Antonius J Van Rooij; Daniel King; Amanda Lange; Matthew Carras; Alain Labrique Journal: Comput Human Behav Date: 2017-10-27
Authors: Joël Billieux; Daniel L King; Susumu Higuchi; Sophia Achab; Henrietta Bowden-Jones; Wei Hao; Jiang Long; Hae Kook Lee; Marc N Potenza; John B Saunders; Vladimir Poznyak Journal: J Behav Addict Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 6.756
Authors: Espen Aarseth; Anthony M Bean; Huub Boonen; Michelle Colder Carras; Mark Coulson; Dimitri Das; Jory Deleuze; Elza Dunkels; Johan Edman; Christopher J Ferguson; Maria C Haagsma; Karin Helmersson Bergmark; Zaheer Hussain; Jeroen Jansz; Daniel Kardefelt-Winther; Lawrence Kutner; Patrick Markey; Rune Kristian Lundedal Nielsen; Nicole Prause; Andrew Przybylski; Thorsten Quandt; Adriano Schimmenti; Vladan Starcevic; Gabrielle Stutman; Jan Van Looy; Antonius J Van Rooij Journal: J Behav Addict Date: 2016-12-30 Impact factor: 6.756
Authors: Yasser Khazaal; Kyrre Breivik; Joel Billieux; Daniele Zullino; Gabriel Thorens; Sophia Achab; Gerhard Gmel; Anne Chatton Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-08-27 Impact factor: 5.428