Literature DB >> 26523210

Mesh implants: An overview of crucial mesh parameters.

Lei-Ming Zhu1, Philipp Schuster1, Uwe Klinge1.   

Abstract

Hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical interventions that use mesh implants. This article evaluates crucial mesh parameters to facilitate selection of the most appropriate mesh implant, considering raw materials, mesh composition, structure parameters and mechanical parameters. A literature review was performed using the PubMed database. The most important mesh parameters in the selection of a mesh implant are the raw material, structural parameters and mechanical parameters, which should match the physiological conditions. The structural parameters, especially the porosity, are the most important predictors of the biocompatibility performance of synthetic meshes. Meshes with large pores exhibit less inflammatory infiltrate, connective tissue and scar bridging, which allows increased soft tissue ingrowth. The raw material and combination of raw materials of the used mesh, including potential coatings and textile design, strongly impact the inflammatory reaction to the mesh. Synthetic meshes made from innovative polymers combined with surface coating have been demonstrated to exhibit advantageous behavior in specialized fields. Monofilament, large-pore synthetic meshes exhibit advantages. The value of mesh classification based on mesh weight seems to be overestimated. Mechanical properties of meshes, such as anisotropy/isotropy, elasticity and tensile strength, are crucial parameters for predicting mesh performance after implantation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hernia mesh; Hernia repair; Incontinence mesh implant; Mechanical parameters; Mesh properties; Mesh weight; Structure parameters; Synthetic mesh; Synthetic raw materials; Textile structure

Year:  2015        PMID: 26523210      PMCID: PMC4621472          DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i10.226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg


  74 in total

1.  Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of a novel macroporous polytetrafluoroethylene knit mesh compared to lightweight and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  L Melman; E D Jenkins; N A Hamilton; L C Bender; M D Brodt; C R Deeken; S C Greco; M M Frisella; B D Matthews
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Comparison of long-term biocompability of PVDF and PP meshes.

Authors:  C D Klink; K Junge; M Binnebösel; H P Alizai; J Otto; U P Neumann; U Klinge
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 3.  The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair.

Authors:  Bernd Klosterhalfen; Karsten Junge; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  J Conze; A N Kingsnorth; J B Flament; R Simmermacher; G Arlt; C Langer; E Schippers; M Hartley; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Classification of prosthetics used in hernia repair based on weight and biomaterial.

Authors:  A Coda; R Lamberti; S Martorana
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  ECM hydrogel coating mitigates the chronic inflammatory response to polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  Denver M Faulk; Ricardo Londono; Matthew T Wolf; Christian A Ranallo; Christopher A Carruthers; Justin D Wildemann; Christopher L Dearth; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Impact of Mesh Fixation on Chronic Pain in Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TEP): A Nationwide Register-based Study.

Authors:  Nihad Gutlic; Peder Rogmark; Pär Nordin; Ulf Petersson; Agneta Montgomery
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Mesh incisional herniorrhaphy increases abdominal wall elastic properties: a mechanism for decreased hernia recurrences in comparison with suture repair.

Authors:  Derek A DuBay; Xue Wang; Belinda Adamson; William M Kuzon; Robert G Dennis; Michael G Franz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 9.  Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia.

Authors:  N W Scott; K McCormack; P Graham; P M Go; S J Ross; A M Grant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

10.  Open inguinal hernia repair with the use of polyglycolic acid/trimethylene carbonate absorbable mesh: a critical update of the long-term results.

Authors:  D Symeonidis; M Efthimiou; G Koukoulis; E Athanasiou; I Mamaloudis; G Tzovaras
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.739

View more
  22 in total

1.  Substantial variation among hernia experts in the decision for treatment of patients with incisional hernia: a descriptive study on agreement.

Authors:  D Kokotovic; I Gögenur; F Helgstrand
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Polypropylene mesh and systemic side effects in inguinal hernia repair: current evidence.

Authors:  Cillian Clancy; Patrick Jordan; Paul F Ridgway
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Ultra-Fine Polyethylene Hernia Meshes Improve Biocompatibility and Reduce Intraperitoneal Adhesions in IPOM Position in Animal Models.

Authors:  Marius J Helmedag; Daniel Heise; Roman M Eickhoff; Sophia M Schmitz; Mare Mechelinck; Caroline Emonts; Tim Bolle; Thomas Gries; Ulf Peter Neumann; Christian Daniel Klink; Andreas Lambertz
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-31

4.  Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release (TAR) in large and other complex ventral hernias: a single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  G Chatzimavroudis; G Kotoreni; I Kostakis; N Voloudakis; E Christoforidis; B Papaziogas
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 5.  Biomaterial-Based Approaches to Address Vein Graft and Hemodialysis Access Failures.

Authors:  Timothy C Boire; Daniel A Balikov; Yunki Lee; Christy M Guth; Joyce Cheung-Flynn; Hak-Joon Sung
Journal:  Macromol Rapid Commun       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 5.734

6.  Critical evaluation of an innovative mesh for bilateral transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernias.

Authors:  G Köhler; I Fischer; R Kaltenböck; M Mitteregger; G Seitinger; A Szyszkowitz
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  META Score: An International Consensus Scoring System on Mesh-Tissue Adhesions.

Authors:  L C L van den Hil; E H H Mommers; J W A M Bosmans; S Morales-Conde; V Gómez-Gil; K LeBlanc; A Vanlander; E Reynvoet; F Berrevoet; S Gruber-Blum; E Altinli; C R Deeken; R H Fortelny; J W Greve; K Chiers; R Kaufmann; J F Lange; U Klinge; M Miserez; A H Petter-Puchner; M H F Schreinemacher; N D Bouvy
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Effect of pore size and spacing on neovascularization of a biodegradble shape memory polymer perivascular wrap.

Authors:  Timothy C Boire; Lauren E Himmel; Fang Yu; Christy M Guth; Bryan R Dollinger; Thomas A Werfel; Daniel A Balikov; Craig L Duvall
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 4.854

9.  BETWEEN PROLENE®, ULTRAPRO® AND BARD SOFT® MESHES WHICH PRESENTS THE BEST PERFORMANCE IN THE REPAIR OF THE ABDOMINAL WALL?

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Lima Utrabo; Nicolau Gregori Czeczko; Cesar Roberto Busato; Mário Rodrigues Montemór-Netto; Leandro Lipinski; Osvaldo Malafaia
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2021-06-11

10.  Temporal Trends of Urogynecologic Mesh Reports to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Jessica C Sassani; Amanda M Artsen; Pamela A Moalli; Megan S Bradley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.