Literature DB >> 32490564

Effect of pore size and spacing on neovascularization of a biodegradble shape memory polymer perivascular wrap.

Timothy C Boire1,2, Lauren E Himmel3, Fang Yu1, Christy M Guth4, Bryan R Dollinger1, Thomas A Werfel1,5, Daniel A Balikov1,2, Craig L Duvall1.   

Abstract

Neointimal hyperplasia (NH) is a main source of failures in arteriovenous fistulas and vascular grafts. Several studies have demonstrated the promise of perivascular wraps to reduce NH via promotion of adventitial neovascularization and providing mechanical support. Limited clinical success thus far may be due to inappropriate material selection (e.g., nondegradable, too stiff) and geometric design (e.g., pore size and spacing, diameter). The influence of pore size and spacing on implant neovascularization is investigated here for a new biodegradable, thermoresponsive shape memory polymer (SMP) perivascular wrap. Following an initial pilot, 21 mice were each implanted with six scaffolds: four candidate SMP macroporous designs (a-d), a nonporous SMP control (e), and microporous GORETEX (f). Mice were sacrificed after 4 (N = 5), 14 (N = 8), and 28 (N = 8) days. There was a statistically significant increase in neovascularization score between all macroporous groups compared to nonporous SMP (p < .023) and microporous GORETEX (p < .007) controls at Day 28. Wider-spaced, smaller-sized pore designs (223 μm-spaced, 640 μm-diameter Design c) induced the most robust angiogenic response, with greater microvessel number (p < .0114) and area (p < .0055) than nonporous SMPs and GORETEX at Day 28. This design also produced significantly greater microvessel density than nonporous SMPs (p = 0.0028) and a smaller-spaced, larger-sized pore (155 μm-spaced, 1,180 μm-sized Design b) design (p = .0013). Strong neovascularization is expected to reduce NH, motivating further investigation of this SMP wrap with controlled pore spacing and size in more advanced arteriovenous models.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hemodialysis access; neovascularization; pore size; pore spacing; shape memory polymers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32490564      PMCID: PMC8270373          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.854


  82 in total

1.  Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Ricardo Londono; Stephen Tottey; Li Zhang; Kathryn A Kukla; Matthew T Wolf; Kerry A Daly; Janet E Reing; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 2.  Intimal hyperplasia and hemodynamic factors in arterial bypass and arteriovenous grafts: a review.

Authors:  Hiroaki Haruguchi; Satoshi Teraoka
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Effects of a vascular graft/natural artery compliance mismatch on pulsatile flow.

Authors:  S F Stewart; D J Lyman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Foreign body reaction to biomaterials.

Authors:  James M Anderson; Analiz Rodriguez; David T Chang
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 11.130

5.  Sites of stenosis in AV fistulae for haemodialysis access.

Authors:  S Sivanesan; T V How; A Bakran
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Measurement of the uniaxial mechanical properties of healthy and atherosclerotic human coronary arteries.

Authors:  Alireza Karimi; Mahdi Navidbakhsh; Ahmad Shojaei; Shahab Faghihi
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 7.  Neointimal hyperplasia associated with synthetic hemodialysis grafts.

Authors:  Li Li; Christi M Terry; Yan-Ting E Shiu; Alfred K Cheung
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  The pore size of polycaprolactone scaffolds has limited influence on bone regeneration in an in vivo model.

Authors:  Sara M Mantila Roosa; Jessica M Kemppainen; Erin N Moffitt; Paul H Krebsbach; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 9.  Molecular engineering of vein bypass grafts.

Authors:  Michael S Conte
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Arteriovenous Access Failure, Stenosis, and Thrombosis.

Authors:  Jennifer M MacRae; Christine Dipchand; Matthew Oliver; Louise Moist; Charmaine Lok; Edward Clark; Swapnil Hiremath; Joanne Kappel; Mercedeh Kiaii; Rick Luscombe; Lisa M Miller
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2016-09-27
View more
  2 in total

1.  Smart scaffolds: shape memory polymers (SMPs) in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Michaela R Pfau; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 7.571

2.  A bioactive compliant vascular graft modulates macrophage polarization and maintains patency with robust vascular remodeling.

Authors:  Alexander Stahl; Dake Hao; Janos Barrera; Dominic Henn; Sien Lin; Seyedsina Moeinzadeh; Sungwoo Kim; William Maloney; Geoffrey Gurtner; Aijun Wang; Yunzhi Peter Yang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-04-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.