D Kokotovic1, I Gögenur2, F Helgstrand2. 1. Center for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital and Copenhagen University, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark. dunja.kokotovic@hotmail.com. 2. Center for Surgical Science, Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital and Copenhagen University, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Benign elective procedures give rise to heterogeneity in indication for surgery and surgical technique among specialized surgeons in a variety of surgical fields. The objective was to analyze the extent of agreement in surgical management among expert hernia surgeons when evaluating the same patient in a standardized setting. METHODS: Five Danish hernia experts answered questions concerning indication for surgery and surgical technique for 25 video recorded real-life clinical cases. The experts evaluated the patients by answering a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: All surgeons were experienced in incisional hernia repair with a median of 253 repairs (range 164-450 repairs). Perfect overall agreement among all the experts in indication, operation type, component separation, mesh fixation and mesh position was found in only five cases (20%). Agreement in indication for surgery was present in 14 cases (56%). The most common reason for not performing surgery was due to comorbidities. Agreement in operation type (open vs. laparoscopic) was present in 10 cases (40%). Agreement in mesh fixation (absorbable tacks/non-absorbable tacks/suture/other) method was also present in 10 cases (40%). Agreement in mesh position (onlay, sublay or intraperitoneal) was found in 40% of cases. The highest overall agreement among the surgeons was observed with regard to whether patients needed component separation (yes/no), 21 cases, (84%). CONCLUSIONS: In a standardized setting, agreement in choice of treatment strategy for patients with incisional hernias was very low among experienced surgeons. A standardization of surgical decision making is desirable to develop new interventions and improve clinical outcomes.
PURPOSE: Benign elective procedures give rise to heterogeneity in indication for surgery and surgical technique among specialized surgeons in a variety of surgical fields. The objective was to analyze the extent of agreement in surgical management among expert hernia surgeons when evaluating the same patient in a standardized setting. METHODS: Five Danish hernia experts answered questions concerning indication for surgery and surgical technique for 25 video recorded real-life clinical cases. The experts evaluated the patients by answering a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: All surgeons were experienced in incisional hernia repair with a median of 253 repairs (range 164-450 repairs). Perfect overall agreement among all the experts in indication, operation type, component separation, mesh fixation and mesh position was found in only five cases (20%). Agreement in indication for surgery was present in 14 cases (56%). The most common reason for not performing surgery was due to comorbidities. Agreement in operation type (open vs. laparoscopic) was present in 10 cases (40%). Agreement in mesh fixation (absorbable tacks/non-absorbable tacks/suture/other) method was also present in 10 cases (40%). Agreement in mesh position (onlay, sublay or intraperitoneal) was found in 40% of cases. The highest overall agreement among the surgeons was observed with regard to whether patients needed component separation (yes/no), 21 cases, (84%). CONCLUSIONS: In a standardized setting, agreement in choice of treatment strategy for patients with incisional hernias was very low among experienced surgeons. A standardization of surgical decision making is desirable to develop new interventions and improve clinical outcomes.
Authors: Tim E Darsaut; Laurent Estrade; Sara Jamali; Michel W Bojanowski; Miguel Chagnon; Jean Raymond Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Jonathan C Papic; S Maria E Finnell; Charles M Leys; William E Bennett; Stephen M Downs Journal: Surgery Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Brett L Ecker; Lindsay E Y Kuo; Kristina D Simmons; John P Fischer; Jon B Morris; Rachel R Kelz Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Michiel G J S Hageman; Prakash Jayakumar; John D King; Thierry G Guitton; Job N Doornberg; David Ring Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Charles J Petit; Peter J Millett; Nathan K Endres; David Diller; Mitchel B Harris; Jon J P Warner Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Quintin P Solano; Jyothi R Thumma; Cody Mullens; Ryan Howard; Anne Ehlers; Lia Delaney; Brian Fry; Mary Shen; Michael Englesbe; Justin Dimick; Dana Telem Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: U A Dietz; A Fleischhacker; S Menzel; U Klinge; C Jurowich; K Haas; P Heuschmann; C-T Germer; A Wiegering Journal: Hernia Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Ralph F Staerkle; Henry Hoffmann; Ferdinand Köckerling; Daniela Adolf; Reinhard Bittner; Philipp Kirchhoff Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Yasmeen M Byrnes; Sammy Othman; Omar Elfanagely; Elizabeth B Card; Joseph A Mellia; Monica Llado-Farrulla; John P Fischer Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2020-12-16