Literature DB >> 26515964

Coronary calcium scans and radiation exposure in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Bradley Messenger1, Dong Li1, Khurram Nasir1, J Jeffrey Carr1, Ron Blankstein1, Matthew J Budoff2.   

Abstract

With the increasing use of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring to risk stratify asymptomatic patients for future cardiovascular events, there have been concerns raised regarding the theoretical risk of radiation exposure to this potentially large patient population. Newer CT protocols have sought to reduce radiation exposure without compromising image quality, but the reported radiation exposures in the literature remains widely variable (0.7-10.5 mSv). In this study, we report the radiation exposure of calcium scoring from our MESA cohort across several modern CT scanners with the aim of clarifying the radiation exposure of this imaging modality. To evaluate the mean effective doses of radiation, using dose length product, utilized for coronary artery calcium scoring in the MESA cohort, in an effort to understand estimated population quantity effective dose using individual measurements of scanner radiation output using current CT scanners. We reviewed effective dose in milliSieverts (mSv) for 3442 participants from the MESA cohort undergoing coronary artery calcium scoring, divided over six sites with four different modern CT scanners (Siemens64, Siemens Somatom Definition, GE64, and Toshiba 320). For effective dose calculation (milliSieverts, mSv), we multiplied the dose length product by conversion factor k (0.014). The mean effective dose amongst all participants was 1.05 mSv, a median dose of 0.95 mSV. The mean effective dose ranged from 0.74 to 1.26 across the six centers involved with the MESA cohort. The Siemens Somatom Definition scanner had effective dose of 0.53 (n = 123), Siemens 64 with 0.97 (n = 1684), GE 64 with 1.16 (n = 1219), and Toshiba 320 with 1.26 mSv (n = 416). Subgroup analysis by BMI, age, and gender showed no variability between scanners, gender, ages 45-74 years old, or BMI less than 30 kg/m(2). Subjects over age 75 yo had a mean effective dose of 1.29 ± 0.31 mSv, while the <75 yo subgroup was 0.78 ± 0.09 mSv (p < 0.05). Effective doses in subjects with BMI > 40 kg/m(2) was significantly greater than other subgroups, with mean dose of 1.47 ± 0.51 mSv (p < 0.01). Using contemporary CT scanners and protocols, the effective dose for coronary artery calcium is approximately 1 mSv, an estimate which is consistently lower than previously reported for CAC scanning, regardless of age, gender, and body mass index.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calcium scanning; Coronary artery calcium; Coronary artery disease; Radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26515964      PMCID: PMC4752888          DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0799-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  17 in total

1.  Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Florian M Vogt; Axel Schmermund; Jörg F Debatin; Gert Kerkhoff; Thomas Budde; Raimund Erbel; Klaus Ewen; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk?

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Jodie A Christner; James M Kofler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography) developed in collaboration with the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Philip Greenland; Robert O Bonow; Bruce H Brundage; Matthew J Budoff; Mark J Eisenberg; Scott M Grundy; Michael S Lauer; Wendy S Post; Paolo Raggi; Rita F Redberg; George P Rodgers; Leslee J Shaw; Allen J Taylor; William S Weintraub
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention.

Authors:  Thomas C Gerber; J Jeffrey Carr; Andrew E Arai; Robert L Dixon; Victor A Ferrari; Antoinette S Gomes; Gary V Heller; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Fred A Mettler; Jennifer H Mieres; Richard L Morin; Michael V Yester
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Coronary artery calcium scoring using a reduced tube voltage and radiation dose protocol with dual-source computed tomography.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Damini Dey; Ariel Gutstein; Ludovic Le Meunier; Victor Y Cheng; Raymond Pimentel; William Paz; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2009-10-13

6.  A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography.

Authors:  T B Shope; R M Gagne; G C Johnson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Ethnic differences in coronary calcification: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Diane E Bild; Robert Detrano; Do Peterson; Alan Guerci; Kiang Liu; Eyal Shahar; Pamela Ouyang; Sharon Jackson; Mohammed F Saad
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient--Part III: Executive summary of the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force report.

Authors:  Morteza Naghavi; Erling Falk; Harvey S Hecht; Michael J Jamieson; Sanjay Kaul; Daniel Berman; Zahi Fayad; Matthew J Budoff; John Rumberger; Tasneem Z Naqvi; Leslee J Shaw; Ole Faergeman; Jay Cohn; Raymond Bahr; Wolfgang Koenig; Jasenka Demirovic; Dan Arking; Victoria L M Herrera; Juan Badimon; James A Goldstein; Yoram Rudy; Juhani Airaksinen; Robert S Schwartz; Ward A Riley; Robert A Mendes; Pamela Douglas; Prediman K Shah
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 9.  Coronary artery calcification screening: estimated radiation dose and cancer risk.

Authors:  Kwang Pyo Kim; Andrew J Einstein; Amy Berrington de González
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-13

Review 10.  Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Andrew N Primak; Natalie Braun; James Kofler; Lifeng Yu; Jodie Christner
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Addressing Knowledge Gaps in the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: a Review of Recent Coronary Artery Calcium Literature.

Authors:  Vasanth Sathiyakumar; Roger S Blumenthal; Khurram Nasir; Seth S Martin
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  The associated factors for radiation dose variation in cardiac CT angiography.

Authors:  Ali B Alhailiy; Ernest U Ekpo; Peter L Kench; Elaine A Ryan; Patrick C Brennan; Mark McEntee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomographic Coronary Artery Calcium Evaluation With a 64-Slice Scanner Versus a 256-Slice Scanner.

Authors:  Paul Madaj; Dong Li; Rine Nakanishi; Daniele Andreini; Gianluca Pontone; Edoardo Conte; Rachael O'Rourke; Christian Hamilton-Craig; Manojna Nimmagadda; Nicholas Kim; Badiha Fatima; Christopher Dailing; Kashif Shaikh; Chandana Shekar; Ju Hwan Lee; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 4.  Role of Coronary Calcium Score to Identify Candidates for ASCVD Prevention.

Authors:  Hong Loan Nguyen; Jing Liu; Maygen Del Castillo; Tina Shah
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 5.  Coronary Artery Calcium for Risk Assessment in Young Adults.

Authors:  Ayman Haq; Michael D Miedema
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Coronary artery calcium is associated with increased risk for lung and colorectal cancer in men and women: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Omar Dzaye; Philipp Berning; Zeina A Dardari; Martin Bødtker Mortensen; Catherine Handy Marshall; Khurram Nasir; Matthew J Budoff; Roger S Blumenthal; Seamus P Whelton; Michael J Blaha
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 9.130

7.  Ten-year association of coronary artery calcium with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Rebekah Young; Gregory Burke; J Jeffrey Carr; Robert C Detrano; Aaron R Folsom; Richard Kronmal; Joao A C Lima; Kiang J Liu; Robyn L McClelland; Erin Michos; Wendy S Post; Steven Shea; Karol E Watson; Nathan D Wong
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 35.855

Review 8.  Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with HIV Infection: An Update.

Authors:  Amish A Patel; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Association of Coronary Artery Calcium in Adults Aged 32 to 46 Years With Incident Coronary Heart Disease and Death.

Authors:  John Jeffrey Carr; David R Jacobs; James G Terry; Christina M Shay; Stephen Sidney; Kiang Liu; Pamela J Schreiner; Cora E Lewis; James M Shikany; Jared P Reis; David C Goff
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

10.  Visually estimated coronary artery calcium score improves SPECT-MPI risk stratification.

Authors:  Cvetan Trpkov; Alexei Savtchenko; Zhiying Liang; Patrick Feng; Danielle A Southern; Stephen B Wilton; Matthew T James; Erin Feil; Ilias Mylonas; Robert J H Miller
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-06-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.