Literature DB >> 28130653

Addressing Knowledge Gaps in the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: a Review of Recent Coronary Artery Calcium Literature.

Vasanth Sathiyakumar1, Roger S Blumenthal1, Khurram Nasir1,2,3,4, Seth S Martin5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) has been proposed as an integrator of information from traditionally measured, non-traditionally measured, and unmeasured risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis. The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk identified several knowledge gaps regarding CAC, including radiation risks, cost-effectiveness, and improving discrimination and reclassification of estimated risk over the Pooled Cohort Equations in the ACC/AHA Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Estimator. In this review, we focus on recent CAC literature addressing these knowledge gaps. We further highlight the potential for CAC to enrich future randomized controlled trials. RECENT
FINDINGS: The use of CAC allows for personalization of cardiovascular risk despite the presence or absence of traditional risk factors across many demographics. Avenues to reduce radiation exposure associated with CAC scanning include increasing the interval between scans for those with CAC scores of zero and estimating CAC from non-cardiac gated CT scans. While limited studies have suggested cost-effectiveness in cardiac risk assessment with the incorporation of CAC in screening algorithms, several studies have demonstrated the ability of CAC to identify non-traditional risk factors that may be used to expand cardiovascular risk personalization in other high-risk populations. Literature from the past 2 years further supports CAC as a strong marker to personalize cardiac risk assessment. While multiple potential avenues to reduce radiation are available and cost-effectiveness analyses are encouraging, further studies are necessary to clarify patient selection for CAC scanning given the interplay between CAC and other imaging modalities in risk personalization algorithms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular disease; Coronary artery calcium; Cost-effectiveness; Primary prevention; Radiation; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28130653     DOI: 10.1007/s11883-017-0643-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep        ISSN: 1523-3804            Impact factor:   5.113


  94 in total

1.  Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Addition to Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Symptomatic Patients.

Authors:  Elsemiek M Engbers; Jorik R Timmer; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Mohamed Mouden; Siert Knollema; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  Determinants of coronary calcium conversion among patients with a normal coronary calcium scan: what is the "warranty period" for remaining normal?

Authors:  James K Min; Fay Y Lin; David S Gidseg; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Daniel S Berman; Leslee J Shaw; Alan Rozanski; Tracy Q Callister
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Digital Mammography and Screening for Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Laurie Margolies; Mary Salvatore; Harvey S Hecht; Sean Kotkin; Rowena Yip; Usman Baber; Vivian Bishay; Jagat Narula; David Yankelevitz; Claudia Henschke
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-04

4.  Visual estimation of coronary calcium on computed tomography for attenuation correction.

Authors:  E M Engbers; J R Timmer; M Mouden; P L Jager; S Knollema; A H J Oostdijk; J P Ottervanger
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2016-04-11

5.  Association between air pollution and coronary artery calcification within six metropolitan areas in the USA (the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution): a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Joel D Kaufman; Sara D Adar; R Graham Barr; Matthew Budoff; Gregory L Burke; Cynthia L Curl; Martha L Daviglus; Ana V Diez Roux; Amanda J Gassett; David R Jacobs; Richard Kronmal; Timothy V Larson; Ana Navas-Acien; Casey Olives; Paul D Sampson; Lianne Sheppard; David S Siscovick; James H Stein; Adam A Szpiro; Karol E Watson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Diagnostic Performance of Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Kidney Transplantation Candidates.

Authors:  Simon Winther; My Svensson; Hanne Skou Jørgensen; Kirsten Bouchelouche; Lars Christian Gormsen; Birgitte Bang Pedersen; Niels Ramsing Holm; Hans Erik Bøtker; Per Ivarsen; Morten Bøttcher
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-04-10

7.  Dietary choline and betaine; associations with subclinical markers of cardiovascular disease risk and incidence of CVD, coronary heart disease and stroke: the Jackson Heart Study.

Authors:  Heather R Millard; Solomon K Musani; Daniel T Dibaba; Sameera A Talegawkar; Herman A Taylor; Katherine L Tucker; Aurelian Bidulescu
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.614

8.  Association between a healthy cardiovascular risk factor profile and coronary artery calcium score: Results from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).

Authors:  Isabela M Bensenor; Alessandra C Goulart; Itamar S Santos; Márcio S Bittencourt; Alexandre C Pereira; Raul D Santos; Khurram Nasir; Ron Blankstein; Paulo A Lotufo
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Quantification of epicardial and intrathoracic fat volume does not provide an added prognostic value as an adjunct to coronary artery calcium score and myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Mathias Possner; Riccardo Liga; Thomas Gaisl; Jan Vontobel; Olivier F Clerc; Fran Mikulicic; Dominik C Benz; Christoph Gräni; Julia Stehli; Tobias A Fuchs; Damini Dey; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Bernhard A Herzog; Oliver Gaemperli; Ronny R Buechel; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 10.  Is there a role for coronary artery calcium scoring for management of asymptomatic patients at risk for coronary artery disease?: Clinical risk scores are not sufficient to define primary prevention treatment strategies among asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Michael J Blaha; Michael G Silverman; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.792

View more
  3 in total

1.  Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomographic Coronary Artery Calcium Evaluation With a 64-Slice Scanner Versus a 256-Slice Scanner.

Authors:  Paul Madaj; Dong Li; Rine Nakanishi; Daniele Andreini; Gianluca Pontone; Edoardo Conte; Rachael O'Rourke; Christian Hamilton-Craig; Manojna Nimmagadda; Nicholas Kim; Badiha Fatima; Christopher Dailing; Kashif Shaikh; Chandana Shekar; Ju Hwan Lee; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2022-03-01

2.  Clinical value of detecting autoantibodies against β1-, β2,- and α1-adrenergic receptors in carvedilol treatment of patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Dong-Yan Hou; Lin Xu; Zhi-Yong Zhang; Xiao-Rong Xu; Xin Wang; Juan Zhang; Jia-Mei Liu; Hua Wang; Jin Chen; Lin Zhang
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  Delphi Analysis of Science Gaps in the 2015 American Heart Association Cardiac Arrest Guidelines.

Authors:  Ashish R Panchal; Rebecca E Cash; Remle P Crowe; Ryan Coute; David Way; Tom Aufderheide; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 5.501

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.