Literature DB >> 12511683

Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT.

Peter Hunold1, Florian M Vogt, Axel Schmermund, Jörg F Debatin, Gert Kerkhoff, Thomas Budde, Raimund Erbel, Klaus Ewen, Jörg Barkhausen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the effective radiation doses delivered at electron-beam computed tomography (CT) and multi-detector row spiral CT of coronary arteries and to compare these doses with those delivered at catheter coronary angiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic phantom equipped with 66 thermoluminescent dosimeters was imaged at cardiac CT. Four protocols for unenhanced coronary artery calcium scoring were simulated: one with electron-beam CT and three with multi-detector row CT. Four similar protocols for coronary CT angiography were simulated. All multi-detector row spiral CT protocols were performed with retrospective electrocardiographic triggering. Biplane catheter coronary angiography also was simulated. Radiation doses to organs were measured, and effective doses were calculated according to guidelines published in International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60.
RESULTS: Coronary artery calcium scoring with electron-beam CT yielded effective radiation doses of 1.0 and 1.3 mSv for male and female patients, respectively. The radiation doses at calcium scoring with multi-detector row CT were 1.5-5.2 mSv for male patients and 1.8-6.2 mSv for female patients. Electron-beam CT coronary angiography yielded effective doses of 1.5 and 2.0 mSv for male and female patients, respectively. The highest effective doses were delivered at multi-detector row CT angiography: 6.7-10.9 mSv for male patients and 8.1-13.0 mSv for female patients. Catheter coronary angiography yielded effective doses of 2.1 and 2.5 mSv for male and female patients, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Higher radiation doses are delivered at multi-detector row cardiac CT compared with the doses delivered at electron-beam CT and catheter coronary angiography. Copyright RSNA, 2002

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12511683     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2261011365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  74 in total

1.  Interscan reproducibility of computer-aided epicardial and thoracic fat measurement from noncontrast cardiac CT.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Haim Shmilovich; Balaji K Tamarappoo; Victor Y Cheng; Piotr J Slomka; Daniel S Berman; Damini Dey
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2011-03-21

2.  Radiation-induced temporary hair loss as a radiation damage only occurring in patients who had the combination of MDCT and DSA.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Imanishi; Atsushi Fukui; Hiroshi Niimi; Daisuke Itoh; Kyouko Nozaki; Shunsuke Nakaji; Kumiko Ishizuka; Hitoshi Tabata; Yu Furuya; Masahiko Uzura; Hideto Takahama; Suzuo Hashizume; Shiro Arima; Yasuo Nakajima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Multi-slice spiral computed tomography: useful for non-invasive coronary angiography?

Authors:  Stephen Schroeder; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Individually adapted coronary 64-slice CT angiography based on precontrast attenuation values, using different kVp and tube current settings: evaluation of image quality.

Authors:  Jean-François Paul
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Dose and image quality comparison between prospectively gated axial and retrospectively gated helical coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  C Hlaihel; L Boussel; H Cochet; J A Roch; P Coulon; M J Walker; P C Douek
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  The potential role for the use of cardiac computed tomography angiography for the acute chest pain patient in the emergency department.

Authors:  Sean R Wilson; James K Min
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Non-invasive imaging in coronary artery disease including anatomical and functional evaluation of ischaemia and viability assessment.

Authors:  M Pakkal; V Raj; G P McCann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Cancer risk related to gastrointestinal diagnostic radiation exposure.

Authors:  Mimi L Chang; Jason K Hou
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-10

Review 9.  Relationship between Calcium Score and Myocardial Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Coronary Disease.

Authors:  Fabio Paiva Rossini Siqueira; Claudio Tinoco Mesquita; Alair Augusto Sarmet M Damas Dos Santos; Marcelo Souto Nacif
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Declining radiation dose of coronary computed tomography angiography: German cardiac CT registry experience 2009-2014.

Authors:  Axel Schmermund; Mohamed Marwan; Jörg Hausleiter; Sebastian Barth; Oliver Bruder; Sebastian Kerber; Grigorius Korosoglou; Alexander Leber; Werner Moshage; Stephen Schröder; Steffen Schneider; Jochen Senges; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.