Christopher R Wottawa1,2, Bradley Genovese1,3, Bryan N Nowroozi1, Steven D Hart4, James W Bisley1,5, Warren S Grundfest1,2, Erik P Dutson6,7. 1. Center for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology (CASIT), UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. 2. UCLA Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Department of Pathology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 5. Department of Neurobiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 6. Center for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology (CASIT), UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. EDutson@mednet.ucla.edu. 7. Department of Surgery, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. EDutson@mednet.ucla.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to evaluate (1) grasping forces with the application of a tactile feedback system in vivo and (2) the incidence of tissue damage incurred during robotic tissue manipulation. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery has been shown to be beneficial in a variety of surgical specialties, particularly radical prostatectomy. This innovative surgical tool offers advantages over traditional laparoscopic techniques, such as improved wrist-like maneuverability, stereoscopic video displays, and scaling of surgical gestures to increase precision. A widely cited disadvantage associated with robotic systems is the absence of tactile feedback. METHODS AND PROCEDURE: Nineteen subjects were categorized into two groups: 5 experts (six or more robotic cases) and 14 novices (five cases or less). The subjects used the da Vinci with integrated tactile feedback to run porcine bowel in the following conditions: (T1: deactivated tactile feedback; T2: activated tactile feedback; and T3: deactivated tactile feedback). The grasping force, incidence of tissue damage, and the correlation of grasping force and tissue damage were analyzed. Tissue damage was evaluated both grossly and histologically by a pathologist blinded to the sample. RESULTS: Tactile feedback resulted in significantly decreased grasping forces for both experts and novices (P < 0.001 in both conditions). The overall incidence of tissue damage was significantly decreased in all subjects (P < 0.001). A statistically significant correlation was found between grasping forces and incidence of tissue damage (P = 0.008). The decreased forces and tissue damage were retained through the third trial when the system was deactivated (P > 0.05 in all subjects). CONCLUSION: The in vivo application of integrated tactile feedback in the robotic system demonstrates significantly reduced grasping forces, resulting in significantly less tissue damage. This tactile feedback system may improve surgical outcomes and broaden the use of robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery.
INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to evaluate (1) grasping forces with the application of a tactile feedback system in vivo and (2) the incidence of tissue damage incurred during robotic tissue manipulation. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery has been shown to be beneficial in a variety of surgical specialties, particularly radical prostatectomy. This innovative surgical tool offers advantages over traditional laparoscopic techniques, such as improved wrist-like maneuverability, stereoscopic video displays, and scaling of surgical gestures to increase precision. A widely cited disadvantage associated with robotic systems is the absence of tactile feedback. METHODS AND PROCEDURE: Nineteen subjects were categorized into two groups: 5 experts (six or more robotic cases) and 14 novices (five cases or less). The subjects used the da Vinci with integrated tactile feedback to run porcine bowel in the following conditions: (T1: deactivated tactile feedback; T2: activated tactile feedback; and T3: deactivated tactile feedback). The grasping force, incidence of tissue damage, and the correlation of grasping force and tissue damage were analyzed. Tissue damage was evaluated both grossly and histologically by a pathologist blinded to the sample. RESULTS: Tactile feedback resulted in significantly decreased grasping forces for both experts and novices (P < 0.001 in both conditions). The overall incidence of tissue damage was significantly decreased in all subjects (P < 0.001). A statistically significant correlation was found between grasping forces and incidence of tissue damage (P = 0.008). The decreased forces and tissue damage were retained through the third trial when the system was deactivated (P > 0.05 in all subjects). CONCLUSION: The in vivo application of integrated tactile feedback in the robotic system demonstrates significantly reduced grasping forces, resulting in significantly less tissue damage. This tactile feedback system may improve surgical outcomes and broaden the use of robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery.
Authors: Brian T Bethea; Allison M Okamura; Masaya Kitagawa; Torin P Fitton; Stephen M Cattaneo; Vincent L Gott; William A Baumgartner; David D Yuh Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 1.878
Authors: Martin O Culjat; Chih-Hung King; Miguel L Franco; Catherine E Lewis; James W Bisley; Erik P Dutson; Warren S Grundfest Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2008
Authors: Phillip Mucksavage; David C Kerbl; Donald L Pick; Jason Y Lee; Elspeth M McDougall; Michael K Louie Journal: J Endourol Date: 2011-01-15 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Christopher R Wottawa; Jeremiah R Cohen; Richard E Fan; James W Bisley; Martin O Culjat; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Qiangqiang Ouyang; Juan Wu; Songping Sun; Jake Pensa; Ahmad Abiri; Erik Dutson; James Bisley Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 4.756
Authors: Ahmad Abiri; Jake Pensa; Anna Tao; Ji Ma; Yen-Yi Juo; Syed J Askari; James Bisley; Jacob Rosen; Erik P Dutson; Warren S Grundfest Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Ahmad Abiri; Yen-Yi Juo; Anna Tao; Syed J Askari; Jake Pensa; James W Bisley; Erik P Dutson; Warren S Grundfest Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Rozalia F Solodova; Vladimir V Galatenko; Eldar R Nakashidze; Igor L Andreytsev; Alexey V Galatenko; Dmitriy K Senchik; Vladimir M Staroverov; Vladimir E Podolskii; Mikhail E Sokolov; Victor A Sadovnichy Journal: Med Devices (Auckl) Date: 2016-10-31