Literature DB >> 30187198

Artificial palpation in robotic surgery using haptic feedback.

Ahmad Abiri1,2, Yen-Yi Juo3, Anna Tao4, Syed J Askari4, Jake Pensa4, James W Bisley4,5, Erik P Dutson4,3, Warren S Grundfest4,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The loss of tactile feedback in minimally invasive robotic surgery remains a major challenge to the expanding field. With visual cue compensation alone, tissue characterization via palpation proves to be immensely difficult. This work evaluates a bimodal vibrotactile system as a means of conveying applied forces to simulate haptic feedback in two sets of studies simulating an artificial palpation task using the da Vinci surgical robot.
METHODS: Subjects in the first study were tasked with localizing an embedded vessel in a soft tissue phantom using a single-sensor unit. In the second study, subjects localized tumor-like structures using a three-sensor array. In both sets of studies, subjects completed the task under three trial conditions: no feedback, normal force tactile feedback, and hybrid vibrotactile feedback. Recordings of correct localization, incorrect localization, and time-to-completion were used to evaluate performance outcomes.
RESULTS: With the addition of vibrotactile and pneumatic feedback, significant improvements in the percentage of correct localization attempts were detected (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0459, respectively) during the first experiment with phantom vessels. Similarly, significant improvements in correct localization were found with the addition of vibrotactile (p = 2.57E-5) and pneumatic significance (p = 8.54E-5) were observed in the second experiment involving tumor phantoms.
CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates not only the superior benefits of a multi-modal feedback over traditional single-modality feedback, but also the effectiveness of vibration in providing haptic feedback to artificial palpation systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haptic feedback; Haptics; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic palpation; Robotic surgery; Vibrotactile feedback

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30187198      PMCID: PMC6401328          DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6405-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  16 in total

1.  Force modeling for needle insertion into soft tissue.

Authors:  Allison M Okamura; Christina Simone; Mark D O'Leary
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems.

Authors:  Masaya Kitagawa; Daniell Dokko; Allison M Okamura; David D Yuh
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Artificial tactile sensing in minimally invasive surgery - a new technical approach.

Authors:  Sebastian Schostek; Chi-Nghia Ho; Daniel Kalanovic; Marc O Schurr
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.442

4.  A pneumatic haptic feedback actuator array for robotic surgery or simulation.

Authors:  Chih-Hung King; Adrienne T Higa; Martin O Culjat; Soo Hwa Han; James W Bisley; Gregory P Carman; Erik Dutson; Warren S Grundfest
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2007

5.  Robotic palpation-based mechanical property mapping for diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bummo Ahn; Enrique Ian S Lorenzo; Koon Ho Rha; Hyung Joo Kim; Jung Kim
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Suture damage during robot-assisted vascular surgery: is it an issue?

Authors:  Jeroen Diks; Denise Nio; Matteus A Linsen; Jan A Rauwerda; Willem Wisselink
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.719

7.  A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterization of soft tissue response.

Authors:  Evren Samur; Mert Sedef; Cagatay Basdogan; Levent Avtan; Oktay Duzgun
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Sensory subtraction in robot-assisted surgery: fingertip skin deformation feedback to ensure safety and improve transparency in bimanual haptic interaction.

Authors:  Leonardo Meli; Claudio Pacchierotti; Domenico Prattichizzo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  A meta-analysis of the effects of haptic interfaces on task performance with teleoperation systems.

Authors:  Verena Nitsch; Berthold Färber
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.487

10.  A remote palpation instrument for laparoscopic surgery: design and performance.

Authors:  Maria V Ottermo; Øyvind Stavdahl; Tor A Johansen
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.442

View more
  5 in total

1.  Examining the Effect of Haptic Factors for Vascular Palpation Skill Assessment Using an Affordable Simulator.

Authors:  Zhanhe Liu; Joseph Bible; Jared Wells; Deepak Vadivalagan; Ravikiran Singapogu
Journal:  IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol       Date:  2020-08-17

2.  Answering the Challenge of COVID-19 Pandemic Through Innovation and Ingenuity.

Authors:  Kathryn Clare Kelley; Jonathan Kamler; Manish Garg; Stanislaw P Stawicki
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  A Simplified Model for Simulating Population Responses of Tactile Afferents and Receptors in the Skin.

Authors:  Qiangqiang Ouyang; Juan Wu; Zhiyu Shao; Dapeng Chen; James W Bisley
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Bio-Inspired Haptic Feedback for Artificial Palpation in Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Qiangqiang Ouyang; Juan Wu; Songping Sun; Jake Pensa; Ahmad Abiri; Erik Dutson; James Bisley
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.756

5.  The Effect of Haptic Feedback on Efficiency and Safety During Preretinal Membrane Peeling Simulation.

Authors:  Anibal Francone; Jason Mingyi Huang; Ji Ma; Tsu-Chin Tsao; Jacob Rosen; Jean-Pierre Hubschman
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.283

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.