| Literature DB >> 26501273 |
Muhammad Farooq1, Nael Abu Taha2, Rachel R Butorac3, Daniel Anthony Evans4, Ahmed A Elzatahry5, Elsayed Ahmed Elsayed6,7, Mohammad A M Wadaan8, Salem S Al-Deyab9, Alan H Cowley10.
Abstract
N-Heterocyclic carbene (NHC) metal complexes possess diverse biological activities but have yet to be extensively explored as potential chemotherapeutic agents. We have previously reported the synthesis of a new class of NHC metal complexes N-heterocyclic with acetate [IPr(BIAN)AuOAc] and chloride [IPr(BIAN)AuCl] ligands. In the experiments reported herein, the zebrafish embryos were exposed to serial dilutions of each of these complexes for 10-12 h. One hundred percent mortality was observed at concentrations≥50 µM. At sub-lethal concentrations (10-30 µM), both compounds influenced zebrafish embryonic development. However, quite diverse categories of abnormalities were found in exposed embryos with each compound. Severe brain deformation and notochord degeneration were evident in the case of [IPr(BIAN)AuOAc]. The zebrafish embryos treated with [IPr(BIAN)AuCl] exhibited stunted growth and consequently had smaller body sizes. A depletion of 30%-40% glutathione was detected in the treated embryos, which could account for one of the possible mechanism of neurotoxicity. The fact that these compounds are capable of both affecting the growth and also compromising antioxidant systems by elevating intracellular ROS production implies that they could play an important role as a new breed of therapeutic molecules.Entities:
Keywords: BIAN; N-heterocyclic carbenes complexes; neurotoxicity; oxidative stress; zebrafish
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26501273 PMCID: PMC4632773 DOI: 10.3390/ijms161024718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Structures of the BIAN N-NHC gold complexes.
Mortality of zebrafish embryos upon exposure to a range of concentrations of the BIAN-NHC gold carbene complexes.
| Concentration (µM) | [IPr(BIAN)AuCl] | [IPr(BIAN)AuOAc] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Embryos Used * | % Mortality | Number of Embryos Used * | % Mortality | |
| Control (1% DMSO | 54.00 ± 0.57 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 50.00 ± 0.57 | 0.0 ± 0.00 |
| 1 | 51.00 ± 0.59 | 0.0 ± 0.00 | 51.00 ± 0.57 | 0.0 ± 0.00 |
| 10 | 50.00 ± 1.15 | 1.0 ± 1.00 | 50.00 ± 1.00 | 3.0 ± 0.5 |
| 15 | 50.00 ± 1.15 | 3.0 ± 1.00 | 50.00 ± 1.52 | 5.0 ± 0.50 |
| 30 | 51.00 ± 1.15 | 5.0 ± 0.57 | 51.00 ± 1.52 | 10.0 ± 1.14 |
| 50 | 52.00 ± 1.15 | 25.0 ± 1.52 | 52.00 ± 1.15 | 60.0 ± 2.00 |
| 100 | 50.00 ± 1.00 | 80.0 ± 0.57 | 50.00 ± 1.16 | 100 ± 0.00 |
* Mean value from three independent experiments ± SD.
Figure 2BIAN NHC gold complexes affected the brain development in treated zebrafish embryos. Representative images of zebrafish embryos exposed to 50 µM of gold acetate, gold chloride and mock treated (1% DMSO v/v) embryos at 32 h post fertilization (hpf). The black arrows indicate the prominent mid–hindbrain boundaries between the posterior midbrain and the anterior hindbrain in the control embryos (A); the red arrow signifies the absence of clear mid-hindbrain boundaries between the posterior midbrain and the anterior hindbrain after exposure to the gold acetate compound (B) and the gold chloride compound (C). The otic vesicle (OV) was not developed in the gold acetate treated embryos. Abbreviations used: MHB = midbrain hindbrain boundary, HB = hindbrain, and OV = otic vesicle.
Figure 3BIAN NHC Gold Complexes induced degeneration of the notochord in treated zebrafish embryos by inducing oxidative stress. Upper panel: Live photomicrographs of representative zebrafish embryos that had been treated with mock (1% DMSO v/v) (A,B); 30 µM of [IPr(BIAN)AuOAc] (C,D) and IPr(BIAN)AuCl 50 µM (D,F) at three dpf. The notochord (represented as NC in the images) in the mock treated embryos lies flat and is located between the organized layers of the sheath cells (indicated by black arrows). In contrast, the embryos that were treated with [IPr(BIAN)AuOAc] exhibited complete degeneration of the entire notochord (see black arrows in D); It is also noteworthy that the distinct boundaries between the sheath layers are absent in the case of the treated embryos (Compare black arrows in B,D); The [IPr(BIAN)AuCl] treated embryos also exhibited degeneration of the notochord, but in a somewhat localized manner, mostly at the anterior trunk (white arrows in F); The sheath cells were also normal in the case of the [IPr(BIAN)AuCl] treated embryos (black arrows F); Lower panel: glutathione (GSH) levels in zebrafish embryos exposed for 24 h. Each histogram represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 vs. control.
Figure 4The [IPr(BIAN)AuCl] exposure induced delay in development decrease growth and organ malformation in zebrafish embryos. Representative live images of the control and treated zebrafish embryos at three dpf (A); and five dpf (B). The body size comparison of the mock treated embryos (1% DMSO v/v) and the 30 µM [IPr(BIAN)AuCl] treated embryos at three dpf revealed that the latter treated embryos were significantly smaller in size. The swim bladder (red arrow B) is evident in the control embryo but fails to form in the case of the treated embryos (red arrow). The mouth structure snout (blue arrow head) also did not form in treated embryos. The treated embryos failed to grow to normal size and remained small when observed at five dpf. In order to avoid bias, the images were captured by placing treated and untreated embryos side by side at the same magnification).
Figure 5The shortened bodies that were observed by treatment with the BIAN NHC gold chloride complex [IPr(BIAN)AuCl] were not due to the leakage of yolk contents. The control embryos at 32 hpf had intact yolks and there was no leakage of the yolk content (A); However, leaky yolk was evident in the zebrafish embryos that had been treated with the BIAN NHC gold chloride complex [IPr(BIAN)AuCl] 30 µM (black arrow head in B) and this could be the reason for the shortened bodies; In order to validate this hypothesis, the yolks of the untreated embryos were punctured at 24 hpf (C, black arrows); and these embryos were allowed to grow until three dpf. Even though there was some developmental delay for the embryos that had been punctured, they grew to the same size as the control (compare the top embryos to D). The images shown in (D) were taken using the same magnification by placing the embryos side by side.