Literature DB >> 26490313

Correlating Surrogate Endpoints with Overall Survival at the Individual Patient Level in BRAFV600E-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with Vemurafenib.

Emily C Zabor1, Glenn Heller1, Lawrence H Schwartz2, Paul B Chapman3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Surrogate endpoints are needed that correlate with overall survival (OS). We analyzed individual patient tumor data from a phase III trial of vemurafenib versus dacarbazine (BRIM3) to identify criteria for tumor measures that correlated with OS. Correlates were validated using a separate data set from a phase II trial of vemurafenib (BRIM2). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Deidentified tumor measurements and OS data from BRIM3 and from BRIM2 were analyzed. Target tumor measurement data and nontarget tumor data were available from pretreatment, weeks 6,12, and every 9 weeks thereafter. In the BRIM3 data set, associations of OS with both early tumor response (first 12 weeks) and time to progression (TTP) were assessed. Different definitions of response and progression were explored. Findings were validated using the BRIM2 data set.
RESULTS: Thresholds of early response were explored ranging from any degree of tumor shrinkage to 100% tumor shrinkage. Correlation was weak at all thresholds tested. TTP, however, was more strongly correlated with OS. The strongest correlation was seen when progression was defined as ≥50% increase in the sum of tumor diameters or appearance of new tumors. This was confirmed by similar analyses in the BRIM2 cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: TTP defined as ≥50% increase in the sum of tumor diameters or appearance of new tumors was more strongly associated with OS than early tumor shrinkage in melanoma patients treated with RAF inhibitor. In future trials, consideration should be given to replacing response rate with TTP or PFS as preferable clinical endpoints in early-phase studies. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26490313      PMCID: PMC5500836          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  23 in total

1.  Use of early tumor shrinkage to predict long-term outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.

Authors:  Hubert Piessevaux; Marc Buyse; Michael Schlichting; Eric Van Cutsem; Carsten Bokemeyer; Steffen Heeger; Sabine Tejpar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The nature and management of metastatic melanoma after progression on BRAF inhibitors: effects of extended BRAF inhibition.

Authors:  Matthew M K Chan; Lauren E Haydu; Alexander M Menzies; Mary W F Azer; Oliver Klein; Megan Lyle; Arthur Clements; Alexander Guminski; Richard F Kefford; Georgina V Long
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Tianxi Cai; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in metastatic melanoma: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Keith T Flaherty; Michael Hennig; Sandra J Lee; Paolo A Ascierto; Reinhard Dummer; Alexander M M Eggermont; Axel Hauschild; Richard Kefford; John M Kirkwood; Georgina V Long; Paul Lorigan; Andreas Mackensen; Grant McArthur; Steven O'Day; Poulam M Patel; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Sosman; Kevin B Kim; Lynn Schuchter; Rene Gonzalez; Anna C Pavlick; Jeffrey S Weber; Grant A McArthur; Thomas E Hutson; Stergios J Moschos; Keith T Flaherty; Peter Hersey; Richard Kefford; Donald Lawrence; Igor Puzanov; Karl D Lewis; Ravi K Amaravadi; Bartosz Chmielowski; H Jeffrey Lawrence; Yu Shyr; Fei Ye; Jiang Li; Keith B Nolop; Richard J Lee; Andrew K Joe; Antoni Ribas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Variability in response assessment in solid tumors: effect of number of lesions chosen for measurement.

Authors:  Lawrence H Schwartz; Madhu Mazumdar; Wendy Brown; Alex Smith; David M Panicek
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Evaluation of lymph nodes with RECIST 1.1.

Authors:  L H Schwartz; J Bogaerts; R Ford; L Shankar; P Therasse; S Gwyther; E A Eisenhauer
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Response to chemotherapy has predictive value for further survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: 10 years experience of the European Lung Cancer Working Party.

Authors:  M Paesmans; J P Sculier; P Libert; G Bureau; G Dabouis; J Thiriaux; J Michel; O Van Cutsem; R Sergysels; P Mommen; J Klastersky
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Masahiro Yanagawa; Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Hiroshi Miyata; Eiichi Morii; Noriyuki Tomiyama; Tadashi Watabe; Kayako Isohashi; Hiroki Kato; Eku Shimosegawa; Makoto Yamasaki; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki; Jun Hatazawa
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Tumour shrinkage measured with first treatment evaluation under VEGF-targeted therapy as prognostic marker in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Authors:  C Seidel; J Busch; S Weikert; S Steffens; C Bokemeyer; V Grünwald
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Clinical Trials of Targeted Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Stefan Michiels; Everardo D Saad; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  The Role of Neoadjuvant Trials in Drug Development for Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Samuel A Funt; Paul B Chapman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Comparing the Efficacy of Cancer Therapies between Subgroups in Basket Trials.

Authors:  Adam C Palmer; Deborah Plana; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 10.304

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.