Literature DB >> 28337673

Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Clinical Trials of Targeted Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors.

Stefan Michiels1,2,3, Everardo D Saad4, Marc Buyse5,6.   

Abstract

Over the past 15 years, targeted therapy has revolutionized the systemic treatment of cancer. In parallel, there has been a growing debate on the choice of end points in clinical trials in oncology. This debate basically hinges on the choice between overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). PFS is advantageous because it is measured earlier than OS, requires a smaller sample size than OS to achieve the desired power, and is not influenced by cross-over. On the other hand, PFS is prone to measurement error and bias, and may not capture the entire treatment effect on the outcomes of most interest to patients with an incurable disease: a prolonged survival and improved quality of life. Therefore, how can we choose between two imperfect end points? The answer to this question would certainly be made easier if PFS could be demonstrated to be a valid surrogate for OS. The validation of a surrogate end point is best made using individual-patient data (IPD) from randomized trials, which allows for standardized assessments of the patient-level and the trial-level correlations between surrogate and final end points. Proper IPD meta-analytical evaluations for targeted agents have still been rare, and to our knowledge only three studies on this topic are currently available in the metastatic setting: one in breast cancer, one in colorectal cancer and one in lung cancer. Although these three studies suffer from limitations inherent to the availability of IPD and the design of the original clinical trials, they have not been able to validate PFS as surrogate for OS, because only modest correlations were found between these two end points, both at the patient and at the trial level. Even if properly conducted surrogate-endpoint evaluations have thus far been unsuccessful, these evaluations are a step in the right direction and can be expected to be applied on a much larger scale in the era of data sharing of clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28337673     DOI: 10.1007/s40265-017-0728-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  45 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 2.  Statistical controversies in clinical research: end points other than overall survival are vital for regulatory approval of anticancer agents.

Authors:  E D Saad; M Buyse
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Rethinking reanalysis.

Authors:  Dimitri A Christakis; Frederick J Zimmerman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Statistical evaluation of surrogate endpoints with examples from cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Geert Molenberghs; Xavier Paoletti; Koji Oba; Ariel Alonso; Wim Van der Elst; Tomasz Burzykowski
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS).

Authors:  Masahiro Fukuoka; Yi-Long Wu; Sumitra Thongprasert; Patrapim Sunpaweravong; Swan-Swan Leong; Virote Sriuranpong; Tsu-Yi Chao; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Da-Tong Chu; Nagahiro Saijo; Emma L Duffield; Yuri Rukazenkov; Georgina Speake; Haiyi Jiang; Alison A Armour; Ka-Fai To; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Tony S K Mok
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  On the relationship between the causal-inference and meta-analytic paradigms for the validation of surrogate endpoints.

Authors:  Ariel Alonso; Wim Van der Elst; Geert Molenberghs; Marc Buyse; Tomasz Burzykowski
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval summary: Erlotinib for the first-line treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) substitution mutations.

Authors:  Sean Khozin; Gideon M Blumenthal; Xiaoping Jiang; Kun He; Karen Boyd; Anthony Murgo; Robert Justice; Patricia Keegan; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-05-27

8.  Multitrial Evaluation of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point for Overall Survival in First-Line Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Nathan R Foster; Lindsay A Renfro; Steven E Schild; Mary W Redman; Xiaofei F Wang; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Keyue Ding; Penelope A Bradbury; Suresh S Ramalingam; David R Gandara; Taro Shibata; Nagahiro Saijo; Everett E Vokes; Alex A Adjei; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin J Solomon; Tony Mok; Dong-Wan Kim; Yi-Long Wu; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Tarek Mekhail; Enriqueta Felip; Federico Cappuzzo; Jolanda Paolini; Tiziana Usari; Shrividya Iyer; Arlene Reisman; Keith D Wilner; Jennifer Tursi; Fiona Blackhall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint of overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Susan Halabi; Brian Rini; Bernard Escudier; Walter M Stadler; Eric J Small
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  9 in total

1.  Authors' Reply to Schoenfeld: "Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Clinical Trials of Targeted Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors".

Authors:  Stefan Michiels; Everardo D Saad; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Comment on: Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Clinical Trials of Targeted Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors.

Authors:  David A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Clinical Trial Endpoints in Metastatic Cancer: Using Individual Participant Data to Inform Future Trials Methodology.

Authors:  Richard M Goldberg; Richard Adams; Marc Buyse; Cathy Eng; Axel Grothey; Thierry André; Alberto F Sobrero; Stuart M Lichtman; Al B Benson; Cornelis J A Punt; Tim Maughan; Tomasz Burzykowski; Dirkje Sommeijer; Everardo D Saad; Qian Shi; Elisabeth Coart; Benoist Chibaudel; Miriam Koopman; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Takayuki Yoshino; Julien Taieb; Niall C Tebbutt; John Zalcberg; Josep Tabernero; Eric Van Cutsem; Alastair Matheson; Aimery de Gramont
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 11.816

4.  Potential Life-Years Lost: The Impact of the Cancer Drug Regulatory and Funding Process in Canada.

Authors:  Joanna Gotfrit; John J W Shin; Ranjeeta Mallick; David J Stewart; Paul Wheatley-Price
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-09-10

5.  Anlotinib Monotherapy for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase III Trial (ALTER0703).

Authors:  Yihebali Chi; Yongqian Shu; Yi Ba; Yuxian Bai; Baoli Qin; Xiuwen Wang; Jianping Xiong; Nong Xu; Helong Zhang; Jianfeng Zhou; Jianming Xu; Ying Cheng; Jifeng Feng; Chunhong Hu; Yigui Chen; Zhendong Chen; Jufeng Wang; Chengxue Dang; Jianhong Wang; Yiye Wan; Yong Tang; Donglin Wang; Jiang Liu; Minhui Wu; Yanhong Deng; Xingwen Li; Yongqiang Li; Jian Dong; Da Jiang; Guisheng Li; Qiong Wu; Jin Li; Yujuan Qi; Yongkun Sun; Jianqiang Cai
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-06-25

Review 6.  Monitoring for Response to Antineoplastic Drugs: The Potential of a Metabolomic Approach.

Authors:  Jodi Rattner; Oliver F Bathe
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2017-11-16

7.  Delta-Radiomics Predicts Response to First-Line Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Valentina Giannini; Laura Pusceddu; Arianna Defeudis; Giulia Nicoletti; Giovanni Cappello; Simone Mazzetti; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Salvatore Siena; Angelo Vanzulli; Francesco Rizzetto; Elisabetta Fenocchio; Luca Lazzari; Alberto Bardelli; Silvia Marsoni; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Front-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and ALK fusion: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yaokai Wen; Tao Jiang; Xiangrong Wu; Haoxin Peng; Shengxiang Ren; Caicun Zhou
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 5.485

9.  Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint of overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Cicero; Rossella De Luca; Francesco Dieli
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.147

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.