Literature DB >> 9616276

Response to chemotherapy has predictive value for further survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: 10 years experience of the European Lung Cancer Working Party.

M Paesmans1, J P Sculier, P Libert, G Bureau, G Dabouis, J Thiriaux, J Michel, O Van Cutsem, R Sergysels, P Mommen, J Klastersky.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was the assessment of the predictive value for survival of an antitumoral response to three courses of chemotherapy in association with various pretreatment characteristics in patients with non-resectable non-small cell lung cancer treated by cisplatin- (or carboplatin)-based combination regimens. Patients considered for this study were eligible patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer registered in one of the seven trials conducted by the European Lung Cancer Working Party from December 1980 to August 1991. All these trials tested chemotherapy regimens with platinum derivatives (cisplatin and/or carboplatin). In this population of 1052 eligible patients, 752 were assessed in this analysis. Data were prospectively collected on 23 pretherapeutic variables and objective response after three chemotherapy cycles. The predictive value of response to chemotherapy on survival (measured from the time of response assessment i.e. 12 weeks after registration in the trial) was studied by univariate analysis as well as by multivariate methods (adjustment of the impact of several covariates simultaneously on the dependent variable) with adjustment for the pretreatment prognostic variables. After three cycles of chemotherapy, the global estimated median survival time was 24 weeks with a 95% confidence interval of 22-25 weeks. By univariate analysis, we identified an objective response to chemotherapy as a highly significant discriminant marker (P < 0.0001) for further survival with estimated median survival times of 41 weeks (95% CI: 38-46) and 19 weeks (95% CI: 17-20), respectively, for the responding and non-responding patients. In a Cox regression model fitted to the data using a forward stepwise procedure, this variable was the first selected explanatory variable. Its effect was adjusted by the introduction in the model of initial disease extent, Karnofsky performance status, serum calcium level and white blood cell count. These results were consistent with those obtained by application of recursive partitioning and amalgamation algorithms (RECPAM) which led to a classification of the patients into three homogeneous subgroups. Our results, using a classical Cox regression model consistent with those highlighted by application of a RECPAM analysis, found an objective response to chemotherapy to be a predominant predictive factor for further survival, although it did not allow any conclusion about a causal relationship. The RECPAM results led to a classification of the patients into three subgroups which needs to be validated in other series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9616276     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00325-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  30 in total

1.  Evaluation of molecular targeted cancer drug by changes in tumor marker doubling times.

Authors:  Kenichiro Enooku; Ryosuke Tateishi; Fumihiko Kanai; Yuji Kondo; Ryota Masuzaki; Tadashi Goto; Shuichiro Shiina; Haruhiko Yoshida; Masao Omata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 2.  Therapeutic cancer vaccines: are we there yet?

Authors:  Christopher A Klebanoff; Nicolas Acquavella; Zhiya Yu; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.988

3.  A Primer on RECIST 1.1 for Oncologic Imaging in Clinical Drug Trials.

Authors:  Kathleen Ruchalski; Marta Braschi-Amirfarzan; Michael Douek; Victor Sai; Antonio Gutierrez; Rohit Dewan; Jonathan Goldin
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2021-05

4.  Tumor response assessment: comparison between unstructured free text reporting in routine clinical workflow and computer-aided evaluation based on RECIST 1.1 criteria.

Authors:  Juliane Goebel; Julia Hoischen; Carolin Gramsch; Haemi P Schemuth; Andreas-Claudius Hoffmann; Lale Umutlu; Kai Nassenstein
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Changes in serum thymidine kinase 1 levels during chemotherapy correlate with objective response in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yongping Liu; Yang Ling; Qiufeng Qi; Yexin Tang; Jianzhong Xu; Zhou Tong; Guifeng Sheng; Quanliang Yang; Yaodong Pan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Strength of Validation for Surrogate End Points Used in the US Food and Drug Administration's Approval of Oncology Drugs.

Authors:  Chul Kim; Vinay Prasad
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 7.  Alternate Endpoints for Phase II Trials in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imaoka; Mitsuhito Sasaki; Hideaki Takahashi; Yusuke Hashimoto; Izumi Ohno; Shuichi Mitsunaga; Kazuo Watanabe; Kumiko Umemoto; Gen Kimura; Yuko Suzuki; Motoyasu Kan; Masafumi Ikeda
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-08-02

Review 8.  MR Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Adrienne N Dula; C Chad Quarles; Ashley M Stokes; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Igor Zhukov; Jason M Williams; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

9.  Cancer Response Criteria and Bone Metastases: RECIST 1.1, MDA and PERCIST.

Authors:  Colleen M Costelloe; Hubert H Chuang; John E Madewell; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Treatment results including more than third-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Seh Jong Park; In Keun Choi; Hee Yun Seo; Hwa Jung Sung; Kyong Hwa Park; Sang Cheul Oh; Jae Hong Seo; Sang Won Shin; Yeul Hong Kim; Jun Suk Kim
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.