Literature DB >> 24985732

The nature and management of metastatic melanoma after progression on BRAF inhibitors: effects of extended BRAF inhibition.

Matthew M K Chan1, Lauren E Haydu, Alexander M Menzies, Mary W F Azer, Oliver Klein, Megan Lyle, Arthur Clements, Alexander Guminski, Richard F Kefford, Georgina V Long.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) inhibitor (BRAFi) drugs dabrafenib and vemurafenib have high response rates in BRAF-mutant, metastatic melanoma; however, 50% of patients progress by 7 months. In this study, the authors examined the nature and management of disease progression (PD) on BRAFi treatment, including characteristics and outcomes of patients who received continued BRAFi treatment beyond disease progression (TBP).
METHODS: Clinicopathologic data at baseline and at the time of PD were collected for all patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma who received BRAFi monotherapy within clinical trials between July 2009 and September 2012. Management and survival after PD were examined, including continued BRAFi TBP (> 28 days beyond Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor [RECIST]-defined PD).
RESULTS: Ninety-five of 114 BRAFi-treated patients had PD. Fifty-three of those 95 patients (56%) progressed in extracranial sites alone, 18% (17 of 95 patients) progressed in intracranial and extracranial sites simultaneously, and 16% (15 of 95 patients) progressed in intracranial sites alone. Twenty-nine of the 95 patients (31%) who had PD progressed in a single site or organ, 48% (46 of 95 patients) progressed in existing metastases only, and 18% (17 of 95 patients) had new metastases alone. At the time of PD, 35 of 95 patients (37%) received no subsequent systemic treatment, 20% (19 of 95 patients) changed systemic treatments, and 39% (37 of 95 patients) continued BRAFi TBP for a median of 97 days. BRAFi TBP and known prognostic factors (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, lactate dehydrogenase, RECIST sum of the greatest dimensions of target lesions) were associated with overall survival (OS) from the time of PD; however, in multivariable analysis, BRAFi TBP improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.93; P = .029).
CONCLUSIONS: Most BRAFi-treated patients progressed in existing extracranial sites, and 31% progressed in isolated sites. Compared with cessation, continued BRAFi TBP is associated with prolonged OS even after adjusting for potential prognostic factors at PD.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF inhibitor; dabrafenib; disease progression; melanoma; resistance; response; treatment beyond progression; vemurafenib

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24985732     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  30 in total

Review 1.  Biology and treatment of BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Kong; Matteo S Carlino; Alexander M Menzies
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2016-02-12

Review 2.  Immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma.

Authors:  Adam J Cooper; Matteo S Carlino; Richard F Kefford
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-08-10

Review 3.  Dabrafenib and its use in the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Samantha Bowyer; Rebecca Lee; Alberto Fusi; Paul Lorigan
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-08-10

4.  Long-term outcome in BRAF(V600E) melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib: Patterns of disease progression and clinical management of limited progression.

Authors:  Igor Puzanov; Ravi K Amaravadi; Grant A McArthur; Keith T Flaherty; Paul B Chapman; Jeffrey A Sosman; Antoni Ribas; Mark Shackleton; Patrick Hwu; Bartosz Chmielowski; Keith B Nolop; Paul S Lin; Kevin B Kim
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  A Fatty Acid Oxidation-dependent Metabolic Shift Regulates the Adaptation of BRAF-mutated Melanoma to MAPK Inhibitors.

Authors:  Mitchell P Levesque; Werner J Kovacs; Andrea Aloia; Daniela Müllhaupt; Christophe D Chabbert; Tanja Eberhart; Stefanie Flückiger-Mangual; Ana Vukolic; Ossia Eichhoff; Anja Irmisch; Leila T Alexander; Ernesto Scibona; Dennie T Frederick; Benchun Miao; Tian Tian; Chaoran Cheng; Lawrence N Kwong; Zhi Wei; Ryan J Sullivan; Genevieve M Boland; Meenhard Herlyn; Keith T Flaherty; Nicola Zamboni; Reinhard Dummer; Gao Zhang; Wilhelm Krek
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Immune Effects of Chemotherapy, Radiation, and Targeted Therapy and Opportunities for Combination With Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Jennifer A Wargo; Alexandre Reuben; Zachary A Cooper; Kevin S Oh; Ryan J Sullivan
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Of Mice and Melanoma: PDX System for Modeling Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Edward J Hartsough; Andrew E Aplin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Improved survival of patients with melanoma brain metastases in the era of targeted BRAF and immune checkpoint therapies.

Authors:  Sarah Sloot; Yian A Chen; Xiuhua Zhao; Jamie L Weber; Jacob J Benedict; James J Mulé; Keiran S Smalley; Jeffrey S Weber; Jonathan S Zager; Peter A Forsyth; Vernon K Sondak; Geoffrey T Gibney
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Correlating Surrogate Endpoints with Overall Survival at the Individual Patient Level in BRAFV600E-Mutated Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with Vemurafenib.

Authors:  Emily C Zabor; Glenn Heller; Lawrence H Schwartz; Paul B Chapman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  Treatment Following Progression in Metastatic Melanoma: the State of the Art from Scientific Literature to Clinical Need.

Authors:  F Serra; S Barruscotti; T Dominioni; A Zuccarini; P Pedrazzoli; S Chiellino
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.