Literature DB >> 21484848

On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data.

Hajime Uno1, Tianxi Cai, Michael J Pencina, Ralph B D'Agostino, L J Wei.   

Abstract

For modern evidence-based medicine, a well thought-out risk scoring system for predicting the occurrence of a clinical event plays an important role in selecting prevention and treatment strategies. Such an index system is often established based on the subject's 'baseline' genetic or clinical markers via a working parametric or semi-parametric model. To evaluate the adequacy of such a system, C-statistics are routinely used in the medical literature to quantify the capacity of the estimated risk score in discriminating among subjects with different event times. The C-statistic provides a global assessment of a fitted survival model for the continuous event time rather than focussing on the prediction of bit-year survival for a fixed time. When the event time is possibly censored, however, the population parameters corresponding to the commonly used C-statistics may depend on the study-specific censoring distribution. In this article, we present a simple C-statistic without this shortcoming. The new procedure consistently estimates a conventional concordance measure which is free of censoring. We provide a large sample approximation to the distribution of this estimator for making inferences about the concordance measure. Results from numerical studies suggest that the new procedure performs well in finite sample.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21484848      PMCID: PMC3079915          DOI: 10.1002/sim.4154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  19 in total

1.  Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves.

Authors:  Patrick J Heagerty; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Evaluating subject-level incremental values of new markers for risk classification rule.

Authors:  T Cai; L Tian; D Lloyd-Jones; L J Wei
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 4.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Measures of explained variation for survival data.

Authors:  E L Korn; R Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

Authors:  F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; K L Lee; R A Rosati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; R M Califf; D B Pryor; R A Rosati
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1984 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Cardiovascular disease risk profiles.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P M Odell; P W Wilson; W B Kannel
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  387 in total

1.  A C-index for recurrent event data: Application to hospitalizations among dialysis patients.

Authors:  Sehee Kim; Douglas E Schaubel; Keith P McCullough
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Development of a risk prediction model for incident hypertension in a working-age Japanese male population.

Authors:  Toshiaki Otsuka; Yuko Kachi; Hirotaka Takada; Katsuhito Kato; Eitaro Kodani; Chikao Ibuki; Yoshiki Kusama; Tomoyuki Kawada
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Comparing two correlated C indices with right-censored survival outcome: a one-shot nonparametric approach.

Authors:  Le Kang; Weijie Chen; Nicholas A Petrick; Brandon D Gallas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Novel metrics for evaluating improvement in discrimination: net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement for normal variables and nested models.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Olga V Demler
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Principled sure independence screening for Cox models with ultra-high-dimensional covariates.

Authors:  Sihai Dave Zhao; Yi Li
Journal:  J Multivar Anal       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 1.473

6.  Quantifying predictive accuracy in survival models.

Authors:  Seth T Lirette; Inmaculada Aban
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  The inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic: an unbiased estimator in the presence of independent censoring.

Authors:  Gaohong Dong; Lu Mao; Bo Huang; Margaret Gamalo-Siebers; Jiuzhou Wang; GuangLei Yu; David C Hoaglin
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  Challenges in Predicting Recurrence After Resection of Node-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Lucas W Thornblade; Michael S Mulligan; Katherine Odem-Davis; Billanna Hwang; Rachel L Waworuntu; Erika M Wolff; Larry Kessler; Douglas E Wood; Farhood Farjah
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Omnibus risk assessment via accelerated failure time kernel machine modeling.

Authors:  Jennifer A Sinnott; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  A unified inference procedure for a class of measures to assess improvement in risk prediction systems with survival data.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Isaac S Kohane; L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.