Literature DB >> 26450588

The influence of lapses of attention on working memory capacity.

Nash Unsworth1, Matthew K Robison2.   

Abstract

In three experiments, the influence of lapses of attention on working memory (WM) capacity measures was examined. Participants performed various change detection tasks while also reporting whether they were focused on the current task or whether they were unfocused and mind-wandering. Participants reported that they were mind-wandering roughly 27% of the time, and when participants reported mind-wandering, their performance was worse compared to when they reported being on-task. Low WM capacity individuals reported more mind-wandering and lapses of attention than high WM capacity individuals, and mind-wandering and filtering abilities were shown to make independent contributions to capacity estimates. These results provide direct support for the notion that the ability to focus attention on-task and prevent lapses of attention is an important contributor to performance on measures of WM capacity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Individual differences; Lapses of attention; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26450588     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0560-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  26 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Fluctuations in pre-trial attentional state and their influence on goal neglect.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Brittany D McMillan
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2014-03-25

3.  The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention.

Authors:  D H Weissman; K C Roberts; K M Visscher; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information.

Authors:  Jonathan M Smallwood; Simona F Baracaia; Michelle Lowe; Marc Obonsawin
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2003-09

6.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Absorbed in thought: the effect of mind wandering on the processing of relevant and irrelevant events.

Authors:  Evelyn Barron; Leigh M Riby; Joanna Greer; Jonathan Smallwood
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-04-01

8.  Individual differences in the allocation of attention to items in working memory: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

9.  Similarities and differences between mind-wandering and external distraction: a latent variable analysis of lapses of attention and their relation to cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Brittany D McMillan
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2014-05-08

10.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  19 in total

1.  Structural Relationship Between Cognitive Processing and Syntactic Sentence Comprehension in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  James W Montgomery; Julia L Evans; Jamison D Fargo; Sarah Schwartz; Ronald B Gillam
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Contralateral Delay Activity Tracks Fluctuations in Working Memory Performance.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Matthew K Robison; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  A locus coeruleus-norepinephrine account of individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

5.  Attentional responses on an auditory oddball predict false memory susceptibility.

Authors:  John E Kiat; Dianna Long; Robert F Belli
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Cognitive predictors of sentence comprehension in children with and without developmental language disorder: Implications for assessment and treatment.

Authors:  Ronald B Gillam; James W Montgomery; Julia L Evans; Sandra L Gillam
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-02-03       Impact factor: 2.484

7.  Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory.

Authors:  Megan T deBettencourt; Paul A Keene; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-05-20

8.  Do familiar memory items decay?

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Joshua Sandry; Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Interactions Between Item Set and Vocoding in Serial Recall.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Mary C Luckasen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by the contents of working memory: An EEG study.

Authors:  T Hinault; K J Blacker; M Gormley; B A Anderson; S M Courtney
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.