Literature DB >> 30460482

Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by the contents of working memory: An EEG study.

T Hinault1, K J Blacker2,3, M Gormley2, B A Anderson4, S M Courtney2,5,6.   

Abstract

Attention and working memory (WM) have previously been shown to interact closely when sensory information is being maintained. However, when non-sensory information is maintained in WM, the relationship between WM and sensory attention may be less strong. In the current study, we used electroencephalography to evaluate whether value-driven attentional capture (i.e., allocation of attention to a task-irrelevant feature previously associated with a reward) and its effects on either sensory or non-sensory WM performance might be greater than the effects of salient, non-reward-associated stimuli. In a training phase, 19 participants learned to associate a color with reward. Then, participants were presented with squares and encoded their locations into WM. Participants were instructed to convert the spatial locations either to another type of sensory representation or to an abstract, relational type of representation. During the WM delay period, task-irrelevant distractors, either previously-rewarded or non-rewarded, were presented, with a novel color distractor in the other hemifield. The results revealed lower alpha power and larger N2pc amplitude over posterior electrode sides contralateral to the previously rewarded color, compared to ipsilateral. These effects were mainly found during relational WM, compared to sensory WM, and only for the previously rewarded distractor color, compared to a previous non-rewarded target color or novel color. These effects were associated with modulations of WM performance. These results appear to reflect less capture of attention during maintenance of specific location information, and suggest that value-driven attentional capture can be mitigated as a function of the type of information maintained in WM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha power; Attentional capture; EEG; Value; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30460482      PMCID: PMC6734557          DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-00663-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  66 in total

Review 1.  EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis.

Authors:  W Klimesch
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1999-04

2.  Dissociation of attention in learning and action: effects of lesions of the amygdala central nucleus, medial prefrontal cortex, and posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Maddux; Erin C Kerfoot; Souvik Chatterjee; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Attention selection, distractor suppression and N2pc.

Authors:  Veronica Mazza; Massimo Turatto; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  On the temporal relation of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms during guidance of attention.

Authors:  Agnieszka Wykowska; Anna Schubö
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Rehearsal in spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides; P A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  On the role of selective attention in visual perception.

Authors:  S J Luck; M A Ford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Napat Rangsipat; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Oculomotor capture is influenced by expected reward value but (maybe) not predictiveness.

Authors:  Mike E Le Pelley; Daniel Pearson; Alexis Porter; Hannah Yee; David Luque
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Distinct roles of theta and alpha oscillations in the involuntary capture of goal-directed attention.

Authors:  Anthony M Harris; Paul E Dux; Caelyn N Jones; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Frontoparietal cortex controls spatial attention through modulation of anticipatory alpha rhythms.

Authors:  Paolo Capotosto; Claudio Babiloni; Gian Luca Romani; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  Modulation of Peak Alpha Frequency Oscillations During Working Memory Is Greater in Females Than Males.

Authors:  Tara R Ghazi; Kara J Blacker; Thomas T Hinault; Susan M Courtney
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.