| Literature DB >> 26448462 |
Yessica Rico1, James Morris-Pocock1, Joanna Zigouris2, Joseph J Nocera3, Christopher J Kyle1.
Abstract
Elucidating the adaptive genetic potential of wildlife populations to environmental selective pressures is fundamental for species conservation. Genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) are highly polymorphic, and play a key role in the adaptive immune response against pathogens. MHC polymorphism has been linked to balancing selection or heterogeneous selection promoting local adaptation. However, spatial patterns of MHC polymorphism are also influenced by gene flow and drift. Wolverines are highly vagile, inhabiting varied ecoregions that include boreal forest, taiga, tundra, and high alpine ecosystems. Here, we investigated the immunogenetic variation of wolverines in Canada as a surrogate for identifying local adaptation by contrasting the genetic structure at MHC relative to the structure at 11 neutral microsatellites to account for gene flow and drift. Evidence of historical positive selection was detected at MHC using maximum likelihood codon-based methods. Bayesian and multivariate cluster analyses revealed weaker population genetic differentiation at MHC relative to the increasing microsatellite genetic structure towards the eastern wolverine distribution. Mantel correlations of MHC against geographical distances showed no pattern of isolation by distance (IBD: r = -0.03, p = 0.9), whereas for microsatellites we found a relatively strong and significant IBD (r = 0.54, p = 0.01). Moreover, we found a significant correlation between microsatellite allelic richness and the mean number of MHC alleles, but we did not observe low MHC diversity in small populations. Overall these results suggest that MHC polymorphism has been influenced primarily by balancing selection and to a lesser extent by neutral processes such as genetic drift, with no clear evidence for local adaptation. This study contributes to our understanding of how vulnerable populations of wolverines may respond to selective pressures across their range.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26448462 PMCID: PMC4598017 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Results from maximum likelihood codon-based models of selection using Codeml.
| Model | P | ln | Parameter estimates | Positively selected sites |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0 (one ratio) | 1 | -537.57 |
| None |
| M1a (nearly neutral) | 2 | -527.69 |
| Not allowed |
| M2a (positive selection) | 4 | -516.17 |
|
|
| M3 (discrete) | 5 | -516.13 |
|
|
| M7 (beta) | 2 | -529.17 |
| Not allowed |
| M8 (beta and omega) | 4 | -516.17 |
|
|
P = number of parameters in the ω distribution; K = estimated transition/transversion rate; ω = selection parameter; pn = proportion of sites that fall into the ωn site class; p, q = shape parameters of the β function (for models M7 and M8). Positively selected sites denoted in cursives were significant at P > 95%, while bold sites were significant at P > 99%.
Goodness of fit based on likelihood ratio test for three nested models of codon evolution.
LRT statistic was computed using 2(Ln mod1-Ln mod2) where Ln represents the likelihood of the two compared models (mod1 and mod2).
| Model compared | LRT statistic | d.f. | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| M0 vs. M3 | 42.87 | 4 |
|
| M1a vs. M2a | 23.04 | 2 |
|
| M7 vs. M8 | 25.99 | 2 |
|
d.f. degree of freedom.
Estimates of genetic diversity for eleven neutral microsatellite loci and MHC DRB-2 across nine sampling regions for wolverines.
| Microsatellites | MHC | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | Samples |
|
|
| H | π | GT | PGT |
|
| RU | 26 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 4.02 | 8 | 0.052 | 12 | 4 | 0.54 |
| YK | 16 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 3.98 | 8 | 0.048 | 9 | 1 | 0.49 |
| NWT | 35 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 4.08 | 9 | 0.042 | 14 | 2 | 0.54 |
| NU | 56 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 4.04 | 10 | 0.041 | 20 | 1 | 0.53 |
| BC | 41 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 3.95 | 9 | 0.051 | 20 | 3 | 0.51 |
| AB | 19 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 3.99 | 9 | 0.052 | 13 | 2 | 0.55 |
| SK | 13 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 3.84 | 7 | 0.046 | 7 | 0 | 0.49 |
| MB | 28 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 4.14 | 8 | 0.052 | 17 | 0 | 0.60 |
| ON | 35 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 4.07 | 8 | 0.05 | 13 | 0 | 0.53 |
Abbreviations as follows: Observed heterozygosity (H ), expected heterozygosity (H ), rarified allelic richness (A ). Number of MHC alleles (H), nucleotide diversity (π), number of MHC-like genotypes (GT), private number of MHC- like genotypes (PGT), MHC individual allele diversity (A).
Fig 1Patterns of microsatellite and MHC genetic variation within nine sampled regions.
(a) Relative frequency distribution of ten MHC alleles per sampled region. Each color of the pie chart represents an MHC allele, while its size is proportional to the frequency of that allele within a location. Numbers within pie charts denote sample size. (b) STRUCTURE barplot of population membership scores for inferred k = 3 genetic clusters for 11 microsatellites.
Fig 2Co-inertia analysis (CoA) between MHC and microsatellite binary-encoded data for nine regions.
Ordination of the first two between-class axes for (a) MHC and (b) microsatellite loci, where dots represent individuals constrained by sampling locations distinguished in different colors; (c) CoA plot, showing the relative position of each population on the factorial plane for the first two CoA eigenvalues and given by the co-variation between MHC and microsatellite data seta. The dots represent the variation observed at microsatellites, while the arrows represent the variation at MHC. The length and direction of the vector denote the translational coefficient of the population position relative to each other, while the strength of the correlation between microsatellite and MHC data sets for each population is inversely correlated with the vector length. Inset figure shows CoA eigenvalues, where each bar represents the proportion of inertia contained for each eigenvalue.
Population pairwise F values for eleven microsatellite loci (above the diagonal) and for MHC DRB-2 (below the diagonal) in nine sampling regions for wolverines.
Values in bold indicates statistically significance after 1000 permutations.
| RU | YK | NWT | NU | BC | SK | AB | MB | ON | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| YK | 0.022 |
|
|
|
| 0.014 |
|
| |
| NWT |
| 0.000 |
|
| 0.013 | 0.005 |
|
| |
| NU |
| 0.007 | -0.004 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| BC | 0.017 | -0.005 | 0.009 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| SK | 0.026 | 0.001 | -0.007 | -0.001 | -0.003 |
|
|
| |
| AB | 0.006 | -0.008 |
|
| -0.005 | 0.010 |
|
| |
| MB |
| -0.002 |
|
| -0.004 | 0.001 | -0.006 |
| |
| ON |
| -0.010 | 0.009 |
| -0.005 | 0.001 | -0.008 | -0.005 |