| Literature DB >> 27877205 |
Yessica Rico1, Danielle M Ethier2, Christina M Davy3, Josh Sayers4, Richard D Weir5, Bradley J Swanson6, Joseph J Nocera7, Christopher J Kyle3.
Abstract
Small and isolated populations often exhibit low genetic diversity due to drift and inbreeding, but may simultaneously harbour adaptive variation. We investigate spatial distributions of immunogenetic variation in American badger subspecies (Taxidea taxus), as a proxy for evaluating their evolutionary potential across the northern extent of the species' range. We compared genetic structure of 20 microsatellites and the major histocompatibility complex (MHC DRB exon 2) to evaluate whether small, isolated populations show low adaptive polymorphism relative to large and well-connected populations. Our results suggest that gene flow plays a prominent role in shaping MHC polymorphism across large spatial scales, while the interplay between gene flow and selection was stronger towards the northern peripheries. The similarity of MHC alleles within subspecies relative to their neutral genetic differentiation suggests that adaptive divergence among subspecies can be maintained despite ongoing gene flow along subspecies boundaries. Neutral genetic diversity was low in small relative to large populations, but MHC diversity within individuals was high in small populations. Despite reduced neutral genetic variation, small and isolated populations harbour functional variation that likely contribute to the species evolutionary potential at the northern range. Our findings suggest that conservation approaches should focus on managing adaptive variation across the species range rather than protecting subspecies per se.Entities:
Keywords: Mustelids; conservation genetics; gene flow; local adaptation; northern range; selection; small isolated populations
Year: 2016 PMID: 27877205 PMCID: PMC5108218 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12410
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Appl ISSN: 1752-4571 Impact factor: 5.183
Figure 1Distributions of genetic variations for MHC and neutral microsatellite loci across eight populations of American badger at the northern portion of its range. (A) Relative frequency distribution of 26 MHC alleles per population. Each colour of the pie chart represents an MHC allele, while its size is proportional to the frequency of that allele within a sampling location. (B) Bar plot of population membership scores for k = 3 genetic clusters inferred with STRUCTURE based on 26 MHC alleles (top) and 20 neutral microsatellites (below). The different colours in the background map denote the subspecies ranges (see legend) from which populations were sampled: Thompson‐Okanagan (TO), East‐Kootenay (EK), Alberta (AB), Saskatchewan (SK), Manitoba (MB), Upper Peninsula (UP) and Lower Peninsula (LP) of Michigan, and Ontario (ON).
Estimates of genetic diversity for 20 neutral microsatellites and MHC in eight populations of American badger subspecies at the northern portion of the species range: Observed heterozygosity (H o), expected heterozygosity (H e), rarefied allelic richness (A r), rarefied private allele richness (P r), inbreeding coefficient (F IS). Number of MHC alleles (H), unique MHC alleles (H u), MHC individual diversity (A d), average MHC pairwise nucleotide differences (P i)
| Subspecies | Location |
| Microsatellite loci | MHC loci | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| TO | 30 | .61 | .72 | 5.9 | 0.19 | .17 | 10 | 0 | .71 | 7.9 |
|
| EK | 30 | .68 | .76 | 7.2 | 0.31 | .11 | 14 | 1 | .58 | 6.95 |
|
| AB | 39 | .71 | .79 | 7.6 | 0.15 | .12 | 16 | 2 | .54 | 7.39 |
|
| SK | 25 | .79 | .81 | 7.6 | 0.14 | .01 | 16 | 1 | .55 | 8.62 |
|
| MB | 48 | .75 | .81 | 7.9 | 0.24 | .07 | 14 | 1 | .57 | 8.63 |
|
| UP | 22 | .6 | .73 | 6.3 | 0.01 | .17 | 10 | 1 | .54 | 8.72 |
|
| LP | 23 | .55 | .7 | 6.3 | 0.26 | .22 | 8 | 0 | .62 | 5.58 |
|
| ON | 19 | .35 | .44 | 3.7 | 0.05 | .21 | 9 | 0 | .62 | 6.52 |
Population abbreviations: Thompson‐Okanagan (TO), East‐Kootenay (EK), Alberta (AB), Saskatchewan (SK), Manitoba (MB), Upper Peninsula (UP) and Lower Peninsula (LP) of Michigan, and Ontario (ON).
Codon sites predicted to be under positive selection by four codon‐based methods of selection in 26 MHC sequences for the American badger
| Sites under positive selection | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Method | 1 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 22 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 42 | 46 | 49 | 53 | 55 | 61 |
| FEL | X | X | ||||||||||||
| REL | X | X | X | |||||||||||
| MEME | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||
| Codeml | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
FEL, fixed effects likelihood; REL, random effects likelihood; MEME, mixed effects model of evolution.
Putative PBR sites are based on Brown et al. (1993) and Stern et al. (1994).
Estimates of effective population size (N e) in eight sampling regions of American badgers. N e was estimated using two methods: Linkage disequilibrium and molecular co‐ancestry with their corresponding 95% confident intervals, which are shown in parentheses. Abbreviations as in Table 2
| Location |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage disequilibrium | Molecular co‐ancestry | ||
| TO | 52 | 65.8 (54.5–85.8) | 34 (2.5 ± 106) |
| EK | 33 | 54 (43–70.7) | 28.2 (6.8 ± 64.5) |
| AB | 46 | 238.5 (145.2–602.8) | 87.4 (1 ± 438) |
| SK | 25 | 389.7 (151–∞) | ∞ |
| MB | 48 | ∞ | 25.6 (10.3 ± 47.3) |
| UP | 22 | 29 (23.2–37.6) | 28.2 (2.1 ± 87) |
| LP | 23 | 16 (13.3–19.4) | 4.5 (2.8 ± 6.7) |
| ON | 20 | 8.6 (5.6–13) | 1.7 (1.2 ± 2.4) |
Figure 2Co‐inertia analysis (CoA) between MHC and microsatellite data for eight populations. Ordination of first two factorial PCA axes for (A) MHC and (B) microsatellite loci, where dots represent individuals within sampling regions distinguished in different colours. (C) CoA plot, sho1wing the relative position of each population on the factorial plane for the first two CoA eigenvalues. The dots represent the variation observed at microsatellites, while the arrows represent the variation at MHC. The length and direction of the vector denote the translational coefficient of the population position relative to each other, while the strength of the correlation between microsatellite and MHC data sets for each sampling region is inversely correlated with the vector length; (D) bottom figures represent canonical weights for MHC and microsatellites.