| Literature DB >> 23734729 |
Mian Zhao1, Yongzhen Wang, Hang Shen, Chenliang Li, Cheng Chen, Zhenhua Luo, Hua Wu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Comparison of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes across vertebrate species can reveal molecular mechanisms underlying the evolution of adaptive immunity-related proteins. As the first terrestrial tetrapods, amphibians deserve special attention because of their exposure to probably increased spectrum of microorganisms compared with ancestral aquatic fishes. Knowledge regarding the evolutionary patterns and mechanisms associated with amphibian MHC genes remains limited. The goal of the present study was to isolate MHC class I genes from two Rhacophoridae species (Rhacophorus omeimontis and Polypedates megacephalus) and examine their evolution.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23734729 PMCID: PMC3684511 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Phylogenetic relationships of anuran MHC class Ia and Ib genes. The neighbor-joining tree was constructed with MEGA5 using all available anuran MHC class I genes with a sufficient length. Bootstrap values are indicated above the branches. Sample names are not shown due to the large size of the tree. Rather, the families to which these samples belong are denoted with different colors. The blue horizontal line separates MHC class Ia genes (above the line) and MHC class Ib genes (below the line). Alleles in this tree include the following: the 27 alleles isolated in the present study (family Rhacophoridae); MHC class Ia alleles from the family Hylidae (19 alleles from A. callidryas: JQ679312-JQ679330; 11 alleles from S. phaeota: JQ679380-JQ679390, [44]); from family Centrolenidae (12 alleles from E. prosoblepon: JQ679331-JQ679342, [44]); from family Ranidae (12 alleles from R. catesbeiana: JQ679343-JQ679354; 16 alleles from R. clamitans: JQ679355-JQ679370; 9 alleles from R. yavapaiensis: JQ679371-JQ679379, [44]; 2 alleles from R. pipiens: AF185587-AF185588, [72]); from family Pipidae ( 5 alleles from X. tropicalis: BC167634, BC161748, BC154904, [73]; NM_001112910, NM_001113065, [74]); 2 alleles from X. laevis: (NM_001085732, [72]; NM_001086402, [73]); and MHC class Ib alleles from family Pipidae (6 alleles from X. laevis: L20726, L20730, L20732, [6]; FJ589642- FJ589643, [75]; NM_001135072, [72]; 2 MHC Ib alleles from X. tropicalis: NM_001037273, NM_001247995, [72]).
Summary of population allele distributions
| 11 | 12 | 15 | |
| 7 | 6 | 14 | |
| 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2 | 3 |
Notes: aHN Hunan, bSC Sichuan.
Average nucleotide and amino acid distances among the 27 newly isolated alleles
| 0.156 (0.010) | 0.143 (0.009) | |
| Exon 2 | 0.341 (0.034) | 0.319 (0.031) |
| Exon 3 | 0.115 (0.014) | 0.132 (0.014) |
| Exon 4 | 0.069 (0.011) | 0.029 (0.006) |
| 0.243 (0.023) | 0.229 (0.022) | |
| α1 | 0.486 (0.062) | 0.452 (0.056) |
| α2 | 0.213 (0.037) | 0.240 (0.036) |
| α3 | 0.099 (0.026) | 0.053 (0.015) |
Notes: Standard errors are shown in parentheses.
Recombination test using the RDP program
| 1 | Rhom16 | 239 | Rhom13/Unknown(Rhom17) | GENECONV, BootScan, MaxChi, Chimaera, Siscan, 3Seq |
| 2 | Pome06 | 239 | Rhom15/Rhom18 | GENECONV, BootScan, MaxChi, Chimaera, Siscan, 3Seq |
| 3 | Rhom17 | 141 | Rhom12/Unknown(Rhom05) | GENECONV, MaxChi, Chimaera, Siscan, 3Seq |
| 4 | Pome04 | 334 | Rhom10/Unknown(Rhom12) | MaxChi, Chimaera, Siscan, 3Seq |
| 5 | Rhom08 | 229 | Rhom15/Rhom18 | RDP, GENECONV, BootScan, MaxChi, Chimaera, Siscan, 3Seq |
Figure 2Alignments of partial amino acid sequences translated from the 27 Rhacophoridae MHC class I alleles. Dots indicate identity to Pome-UA*04 and signs “-” denote deletions. Sites in shaded columns represent the putative ABS deduced from structural information for human HLA molecules [47,48]. Signs “*”, “**” refer to amino acids predicted to be under positive selection in the M8 model of PAML, with a posterior probability >95% and >99%, respectively. Signs “^” refer to positively selected sites identified by FEL and MEME.
Summary statistics for codon sites undergoing positive selection identified by different methods
| α | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 11 | 21 | 42 | 52 | 53 | 56 | 59 | 67 | | | | | | | | |
| Codemla | ** | ** | | ** | ** | ** | ** | * | | | | | | | | |
| FELb | ^ | | ^ | | ^ | ^ | ^ | ^ | | | | | | | | |
| MEMEc | ^ | | | | ^ | ^ | ^ | | | | | | | | | |
| α | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 4 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 20 | 23 | 25 | 41 | 42 | 52 | 61 | 63 | 67 | 74 | 77 | 81 |
| Codemla | | ** | ** | | | ** | ** | | ** | | | ** | ** | | | |
| FELb | | | ^ | ^ | ^ | | | ^ | ^ | ^ | ^ | ^ | | | | |
| MEMEc | ^ | | ^ | ^ | | ^ | | | | | | | | ^ | ^ | ^ |
| α | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 10 | 34 | 40 | 72 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Codemla | * | * | ** | ** | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| FELb | | | ^ | ^ | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| MEMEc | ||||||||||||||||
Notes: Numbers correspond to the alignment shown in Figure 2. aAmino acids identified in model M8 by the Bayes empirical Bayes procedure [67] using Codeml. Only those sites predicted to be undergoing positive selection with a posterior probability >95% are presented in the table. The * indicates that the posterior probability is >95%, and ** shows that the probability is >99%. bAmino acid sites identified by FEL are identified with ^. cAmino acid sites identified by MEME are identified with ^.
Figure 3Phylogenetic relationships of exon 2 (a), exon 3 (b), and exon 4 (c) in anuran MHC class I alleles. All of the trees were rooted from MHC Ib genes of Xenopus. Bootstrap values >50% (from the neighbor-joining analysis) are shown above the respective clades. Bayesian posterior probabilities >0.70 are presented below the clades. All of the branches are proportional to the scale shown at the bottom right of the figure, excluding branches with the sign “//”, which were shortened for graphical clarity of the remaining branches of the tree. Alleles belonging to different species are marked using different colored bars. Involved allelic sequences obtained from NCBI include the following: MHC class Ia alleles from S. phaeota (Smph-UA*07: JQ679386; Smph-UA*02: JQ679381; Smph-UA*01: JQ679380); L. yavapaiensis (Liya-UA*09: JQ679379; Liya-UA*07: JQ679377; Liya-UA*01: JQ679371); L. clamitans (Licl-UA*15: JQ679369; Licl-UA*02: JQ679356; Licl-UA*01: JQ679355); L. catesbeianus (Lica-UA*12: JQ679354; Lica-UA*08: JQ679350; Lica-UA*03: JQ679345); E. prosoblepon (Espr-UA*07: JQ679337; Espr-UA*04: JQ679334; Espr-UA*02: JQ679332); A. callidryas (Agca-UA*10: JQ679321; Agca-UA*08: JQ679319; Agca-UA*02: JQ679313); R. pipiens (Rapi-R6: AF185587; Rapi-R9: AF185588); R. temporaria (Rate-13-3b: FJ385632; Rate-02-3b: FJ385633; Rate-15-2a: FJ385641); X. tropicalis (Xetr-01: BC161748; Xetr-02: NM_001113065; Xetr-03: BC154904); and MHC Ib alleles from X. tropicalis (Xetr-Ibtv1: NM_001247995) and from X. laevis (Xela-Ib11: FJ589643; Xela-IbNC3: L20726).
Figure 4Minimum numbers of putative MHC class Ia loci in amphibian species. The simplified phylogenetic tree of amphibian species with a deduced number of MHC class Ia loci is based on the amphibian pedigree shown in [42]. The putative number of loci is shown above the corresponding branches.