Literature DB >> 14629372

Assessing population structure and gene flow in Montana wolverines (Gulo gulo) using assignment-based approaches.

C C Cegelski1, L P Waits, N J Anderson.   

Abstract

In North America, wolverines once occupied a continuous range from Alaska southward to New Mexico. In the lower 48 states, small remnant populations remain only in the northwestern United States. Among these remnant populations, the Montana population has the highest probability of long-term persistence given its size and proximity to healthy populations in Canada. In this study, we evaluate population genetic structure and gene flow among Montana wolverines using 10 polymorphic microsatellite loci. Bayesian and frequency-based assignment tests revealed significant population substructure and provide support for at least three subpopulations in Montana. FST values between subpopulations ranged from 0.08 to 0.10 and provide evidence for male-biased dispersal. The high degree of population substructure and low levels of gene flow contrast results from wolverine population genetic studies in less fragmented landscapes of Alaska and Canada. This study provides additional support for the hypothesis that large carnivore populations of Montana are becoming increasingly fragmented due to human development and disturbance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14629372     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01969.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  20 in total

1.  History-driven population structure and asymmetric gene flow in a recovering large carnivore at the rear-edge of its European range.

Authors:  A A Karamanlidis; T Skrbinšek; M de Gabriel Hernando; L Krambokoukis; V Munoz-Fuentes; Z Bailey; C Nowak; A V Stronen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Genetic analysis reveals demographic fragmentation of grizzly bears yielding vulnerably small populations.

Authors:  Michael F Proctor; Bruce N McLellan; Curtis Strobeck; Robert M R Barclay
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A spatial statistical model for landscape genetics.

Authors:  Gilles Guillot; Arnaud Estoup; Frédéric Mortier; Jean François Cosson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A spatial dirichlet process mixture model for clustering population genetics data.

Authors:  Brian J Reich; Howard D Bondell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Micro-endemic species of snails and amphipods show population genetic structure across very small geographic ranges.

Authors:  Ashley D Walters; Daniel A Trujillo; David J Berg
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.832

6.  Demographic mechanisms underpinning genetic assimilation of remnant groups of a large carnivore.

Authors:  Nate Mikle; Tabitha A Graves; Ryan Kovach; Katherine C Kendall; Amy C Macleod
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Lack of genetic structure and female-specific effect of dispersal barriers in a rabies vector, the striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis).

Authors:  Benoit Talbot; Dany Garant; Sébastien Rioux Paquette; Julien Mainguy; Fanie Pelletier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Gene flow and population structure of a solitary top carnivore in a human-dominated landscape.

Authors:  Jeannine S McManus; Desiré L Dalton; Antoinette Kotzé; Bool Smuts; Amy Dickman; Jason P Marshal; Mark Keith
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Dispersal and population structure at different spatial scales in the subterranean rodent Ctenomys australis.

Authors:  Matías S Mora; Fernando J Mapelli; Oscar E Gaggiotti; Marcelo J Kittlein; Enrique P Lessa
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Genetic variation in Northern Thailand Hill Tribes: origins and relationships with social structure and linguistic differences.

Authors:  Davide Besaggio; Silvia Fuselli; Metawee Srikummool; Jatupol Kampuansai; Loredana Castrì; Chris Tyler-Smith; Mark Seielstad; Daoroong Kangwanpong; Giorgio Bertorelle
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.